[Phys-L] Re: god friendly science

[Jim Green <JMGreen@SISNA.COM>]

> > ... I'm not criticizing the "science" arguments only here, both
> > sides are equally flawed.
>
> That is your OPINION.  I do not share it.
>
> > The idea that the "the natural world is so complex and well-ordered
> > that an  intelligent cause is the best way to explain  it" is also
> > refutable opinion

I do share it.  Physicists tend to be a bit puffed up -- We are PHYSICISTS
after all.  But good physicists have come to understand the we don't _know_
anything.  All we have are a few models -- which may give usable answers
sometimes.

Chemists are very adept at using tables.  Biologists like to invert
descriptions and categorize to their heart's content, but they know very
little.

Evolution is a very helpful model, but it is in even more of a mess then
physics. It is no more "provable" then Genisis, which is also in a very big
mess.  Bur it is worth thinking about.

Unless a physicist ego gets in the way,

Jim
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l