Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
[Phys-L] Re: Should Randomized Control Trials Be the Gold Standard of Educational Research?
From
: "RAUBER, JOEL" <
Joel.Rauber@SDSTATE.EDU
>
Date
: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:16:36 -0500
| UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
|
| [I shall politely forego criticism of Jack's
| reply-button-pushing, archive-clogging, re-infliction on
| suffering Phys-L'ers of two ENTIRE already archived posts,
| Shapiro (2005) and Hake (2005a) - why not use "webcites"
| (Hake 2005b)].
Apparently not.
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
Prev by Date:
[Phys-L] Re: Should Randomized Control Trials Be the Gold Standard of Educational Research?
Next by Date:
[Phys-L] FW: [math-learn] Randomized Trials: Answer What Works?
Previous by thread:
[Phys-L] Re: Should Randomized Control Trials Be the Gold Standard of Educational Research?
Next by thread:
[Phys-L] Re: Should Randomized Control Trials Be the Gold Standard of Educational Research?
Index(es):
Date
Thread