Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Physltest] [Phys-L] Re: California standards test in physics



This discussion now has degenerated to the point where we can clearly see
why a committee should NEVER write a test! ;-)

Rick

*********************************************************
Richard W. Tarara
Professor of Physics
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, Indiana
rtarara@saintmarys.edu
********************************************************
Free Physics Educational Software (Win & Mac)
www.saintmarys.edu/~rtarara/software.html
********************************************************


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Britton" <cvbritton@EARTHLINK.NET>
To: <PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: California standards test in physics


well, Herb - I see from YOUR note that series IS specified.
Some rubber IS conductive. Especially is carbon-black is used to color it.


At 10:23 PM -0500 1/6/05, Herbert H Gottlieb wrote:
Thanks fpr the insight, Chuck.
You've saved the day.

Herb

> >>> 3. A student wires a series circuit that includes a
> > >> block of rubber and a light bulb.
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l