Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: accelerating charge



I haven't had the time to sort out the various arguments presented, but I
find the concept of a single stationary charge in a gravitational field
spontaneously radiating energy rather unnerving. But until then, I can't
quite accept the argument that it really doesn't matter because the
radiation is so small. It either radiates or it doesn't - the reference
supplied by John M is fascinating - even if it doesn't resolve the issue.
Appealing to a phantom charge to complete a "dipole" seems too easy a way
out of the dilemma since the history of the separation of charges is not
part of the argument.

Bob at PC



-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for Physics Educators [mailto:PHYS-L@list1.ucc.nau.edu] On
Behalf
Of John Denker

It is highly amusing to estimate how much radiation there
will be. It serves as a good exercise and example of
qualitative reasoning. You can do quite a nice job using
little more than scaling arguments and dimensional analysis.
You can calculate it on half a sheet of paper. Here goes: