Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: the energy



Hi All,

I'm still getting used to new email software. I unfortunately placed my
reply in the wrong location in my last email and my comments may be
inadvertently attributed to Paolo. Sorry for the sloppiness.

As soon as I sent the last email, I thought of a counterexample to my own
comment. If I kick a rock made of Uranium it hurts my toe. If I come back
to the same rock after a few million years and kick it again it hurts a
"little" less. This is due to internal rearrangement of the particles that
make up the Uranium atoms through radioactive decay into other atoms and
particles - along with a release in energy as the internal potential
energies readjust - resulting in a lower mass.

It has always seemed a little wondrous to me that a quantity that we
introduce as a convenience in Physics 1 to create a scalar way of avoiding
the vector nature of Newton's 2nd Law turns out to have some sense of
reality in the equation E_0 = mc^2 and also in the General Theory of
Relativity.

Bob at PC

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 10/23/2004 at 12:19 PM Bob LaMontagne wrote:

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 10/23/2004 at 3:15 PM Paolo Cavallo wrote:

I can stub my toe on a rock and it hurts. I can't stub my toe on
gravitational potential energy. I feel very comfortable calling one "real"
and one "fictional" or "abstract".

Bob at PC