Re: symbol for KE

[Hugh Haskell <hhaskell@MINDSPRING.COM>]

At 11:08 PM -0400 8/23/04, Carl Mungan wrote:
> Why do so many upper-level texts insist on using T as a symbol for
> KE? This seems to me to already be an overused symbol (for example,
> standing for period of oscillation, time of flight, temperature,
> tesla, etc) whereas I can't offhand think of any common quantity
> represented by K except kelvin (lower-case k is overused, but not
> upper-case). I'm thinking of obstinately using K on the board even
> though our classical mechanics text uses T, but before I do this, I'd
> like to hear any opinions why this might not be a good idea. Thanks,

Personally, I also prefer something other than T for kinetic energy.
I think I could live with K, but E-sub-K seems superior to both. I'm
not passionate about the latter, however.

Hugh
--

Hugh Haskell
<mailto:haskell@ncssm.edu>
<mailto:hhaskell@mindspring.com>

(919) 467-7610

Never ask someone what computer they use. If they use a Mac, they
will tell you. If not, why embarrass them?
                       --Douglas Adams
******************************************************