Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Leigh Palmer <palmer@SFU.CA> wrote:left off and the
"It was not clear from Bill's posting where the science
fiction began in his "Dark Visitor" story. If it wasintended that the
discovery of Pluto was achieved because of supposedunattributed
perturbations in Neptune's orbit, that is not the case...." (His full
message is at end.)perturbations and Lowells
Bills reply to Leigh:
SUMMARY: I dont agree, but even if planetary
predictions had nothing to do with Plutos discovery, Iwould still
shamelessly exploit this widely held belief. Also withoutshame, the large
headline of my Drexel University newspaper article(reproduced at
www.DarkVisitor.com ) intentionally has an extremelyvulgar
interpretation, in the hope that students will cut it out,tell others
about it, etc. That article tells the same early-universephysics given
below and explains how large stars form black holes, etc.but its vulgar
title is why it may attract Dark Visitors targetreaders (people not
currently interested in science.) The Asian challenge(outlined in my
original post) is so strong that substantially morescience students must
recruited.