Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On Monday, Jul 26, 2004, at 02:52 America/New_York,Bernard Cleyet
wrote:Freeman was
p.s. I'm generally disappointed w/ Sci. Am. since W H
isn't so happybought out. Is it I or do others agree? Shawn Carlson
used to be. Iseither!
It is definitely a less attractive journal to me than it
it only a matter of form? I do not think so. The way theydescribe
things seems to be more shallow. They probably decided totarget
different kind of readers.
Ludwik Kowalski