Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of June, 2004
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
turn signal
,
06/03/2004 12:58, Carl E. Mungan
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:04, David Bowman
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:04, David T. Marx
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:05, Glenn Malin
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:06, Shapiro, Mark
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:09, Mike Smith
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: turn signal
,
06/03/2004 13:12, Bernard Cleyet
Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 01:23, carl preske
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 03:31, John Denker
Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 06:10, Peter Schoch
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 08:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 08:21, Peter Schoch
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 08:40, Larry Cartwright
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 09:14, Jerry Hester
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 09:38, Pete Lohstreter
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 10:16, David Bowman
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 10:22, Pete Lohstreter
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 10:24, Matt Coia
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 10:50, John Denker
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 11:03, John Denker
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 11:05, David Bowman
Re: turn signal - how it works
,
06/04/2004 11:16, David T. Marx
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 11:26, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 11:54, Dan MacIsaac
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 12:05, Dan MacIsaac
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 12:26, John Clement
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 12:28, John Clement
Monthly Technical Posting for PHYS-L
,
06/04/2004 13:14, Dan MacIsaac
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 13:37, Joseph Bellina
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 14:04, John Denker
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 14:04, John Clement
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 14:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 14:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 15:03, matt coia
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 15:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/04/2004 15:52, Pete Lohstreter
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 18:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/04/2004 19:00, John Denker
Re: turn signal
,
06/04/2004 19:03, John Denker
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/05/2004 08:41, Rick Swanson
Re: turn signal
,
06/05/2004 09:13, Clarence Bennett
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/05/2004 09:58, Richard Tarara
Re: turn signal
,
06/05/2004 10:30, Karl Trappe
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/05/2004 10:37, John Clement
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/05/2004 11:38, E. L. Jossem
Re: Physics Textbooks
,
06/05/2004 12:11, John Clement
Physics Textbooks
,
06/05/2004 14:40, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/05/2004 16:58, Hugh Logan
"Galileo's Children" Was: Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/05/2004 20:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/05/2004 20:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/05/2004 21:24, Brian Whatcott
What are "principles" in science?
,
06/06/2004 12:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/06/2004 13:56, John Denker
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/06/2004 16:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/06/2004 16:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/06/2004 16:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/06/2004 17:05, John Clement
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/06/2004 20:37, John Denker
Science quotation update
,
06/06/2004 20:42, Carl Gaither
Re: Science quotation update
,
06/06/2004 22:39, Karl Trappe
Re: Physics Education reform in 50s and 60s
,
06/07/2004 07:25, Peter Schoch
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 07:48, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy level diagrams
,
06/07/2004 08:43, Rick Swanson
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 10:11, Robert Cohen
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 10:44, Chuck Britton
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 10:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 13:43, Ludwik Kowalski
test4
,
06/07/2004 13:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 13:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 14:21, Robert Cohen
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 14:27, Robert Cohen
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 14:33, Mark Sylvester
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 14:54, Ludwik Kowalski
testing, please ignore...
,
06/07/2004 15:03, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 20:00, Jack Uretsky
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 20:17, Jack Uretsky
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 20:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 20:29, John Clement
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 20:47, John Clement
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 20:52, Jack Uretsky
sending a reply
,
06/07/2004 20:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: sending a reply
,
06/07/2004 21:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: sending a reply
,
06/07/2004 21:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Phys-l List Server Reshuffle
,
06/07/2004 21:25, Brian Whatcott
Re: Phys-l List Server Reshuffle
,
06/07/2004 21:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Phys-l List Server Reshuffle
,
06/07/2004 21:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/07/2004 23:55, Hugh Haskell
Re: Regents Textbooks
,
06/08/2004 00:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 04:03, Mark Sylvester
transit of Venus
,
06/08/2004 04:46, Mark Sylvester
Re: transit of Venus
,
06/08/2004 06:23, Mark Sylvester
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 08:02, Brian Whatcott
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 08:23, Clarence Bennett
Re: transit of Venus
,
06/08/2004 08:35, Todd Pedlar
Re: transit of Venus
,
06/08/2004 08:43, Daryl L Taylor
Hand waving in physics teaching?
,
06/08/2004 09:22, Savinainen Antti
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 09:32, Robert Cohen
testing
,
06/08/2004 10:02, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Hand waving in physics teaching?
,
06/08/2004 10:09, John Clement
Re: testing
,
06/08/2004 10:10, John Clement
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 12:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: Phys-l List Server Reshuffle
,
06/08/2004 12:56, Dan MacIsaac
Re: Phys-l List Server Reshuffle
,
06/08/2004 13:01, Dan MacIsaac
Re: Phys-l List Server Reshuffle
,
06/08/2004 14:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: transit of Venus
,
06/08/2004 14:36, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 14:50, Mark Sylvester
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 15:11, Mark Sylvester
Re: Hand waving in physics teaching?
,
06/08/2004 18:55, John Denker
Re: Hand waving in physics teaching?
,
06/08/2004 19:35, John Clement
Re: Hand waving in physics teaching?/E&M text.
,
06/08/2004 19:44, Jack Uretsky
What are "principles" in science?
,
06/08/2004 22:08, ALVIN BACHMAN
What protects scientists? (was "principles" in science?)
,
06/09/2004 00:30, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 14:02, John Denker
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 14:57, Larry Woolf
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 16:25, Bob LaMontagne
Riemann was right (according to de Brange)
,
06/09/2004 18:18, John Denker
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 18:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 18:38, Hugh Haskell
The Essential Exponential! book by Albert A. Bartlett
,
06/09/2004 18:41, Robert G. Fuller
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 21:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/09/2004 23:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/10/2004 03:33, John Clement
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/10/2004 04:56, John Denker
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/10/2004 09:04, Bob LaMontagne
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/10/2004 10:24, SSHS KPHOX
listserv follies: character coding etc.
,
06/10/2004 12:19, John Denker
Re: What are "principles" in science?
,
06/10/2004 12:57, Jack Uretsky
What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/10/2004 21:05, Tony Wayne
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/11/2004 08:12, Tom Ford
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/13/2004 03:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/14/2004 09:15, Karl Trappe
Seeking information about anodization supplies
,
06/14/2004 18:45, Daniel Crowe
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/15/2004 08:29, Tony Wayne
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/15/2004 10:07, Brian Whatcott
Re: Seeking information about anodization supplies
,
06/15/2004 10:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: Seeking information about anodization supplies
,
06/15/2004 12:54, Daniel Crowe
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/15/2004 13:16, Tom Ford
Re: Seeking information about anodization supplies
,
06/15/2004 17:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What is this piece of equipment?
,
06/15/2004 18:59, Brian Whatcott
Re: Physics Regents Exams
,
06/16/2004 10:56, Herbert H Gottlieb
Fwd: AAPT Update Number 6
,
06/16/2004 13:45, Dan MacIsaac
Re: Physics Regents Exams
,
06/17/2004 14:16, Jack Uretsky
Cosmology
,
06/17/2004 15:19, Jim Green
Re: Cosmology
,
06/17/2004 19:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/18/2004 09:56, Folkerts, Timothy J
Cosmology
,
06/18/2004 11:43, Jim Green
Re: Cosmology
,
06/18/2004 20:23, Brian Whatcott
Cosmology
,
06/18/2004 21:46, Jim Green
Re: Cosmology
,
06/19/2004 01:07, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Cosmology
,
06/19/2004 19:56, Jack Uretsky
Re: Cosmology
,
06/20/2004 00:50, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/20/2004 01:10, Hugh Logan
XMDS
,
06/20/2004 10:09, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/20/2004 16:20, Jack Uretsky
Re: Cosmology
,
06/20/2004 17:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/20/2004 19:13, Brian Whatcott
Is the AAPT Concerned With K-8 Science Instruction?
,
06/20/2004 19:51, Richard Hake
Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/20/2004 21:11, Jeremy Batterson
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/20/2004 23:54, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 00:32, John Clement
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 01:10, John Clement
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 01:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 04:39, Hugh Logan
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 06:39, John Denker
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 07:24, Mark Sylvester
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 10:38, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 10:45, Hugh Haskell
Re: Is the AAPT Concerned With K-8 Science Instruction?
,
06/21/2004 11:01, Dan MacIsaac
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 11:52, Bob LaMontagne
Re: 1/r^2, geometry, flux
,
06/21/2004 12:14, John Denker
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 12:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 12:35, John Denker
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 12:41, Jack Uretsky
Re: 1/r^2, geometry, flux
,
06/21/2004 13:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 13:27, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 13:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 15:21, David Bowman
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 18:31, John Clement
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 19:23, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 20:10, Jack Uretsky
Re: Cosmology
,
06/21/2004 20:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/21/2004 23:16, Jeremy Batterson
Re: Knowing what you know not about what should be known
,
06/22/2004 01:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/22/2004 01:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/22/2004 01:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/22/2004 02:31, Hugh Logan
Conceptual Homework
,
06/22/2004 09:00, ron greene
Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 09:48, Robert Cohen
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 11:38, John Clement
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 11:54, Roger Haar
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 12:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 12:22, Michael Edmiston
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 12:41, Michael Edmiston
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 12:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 12:46, Hugh Haskell
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 13:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Cosmology
,
06/22/2004 13:17, Jack Uretsky
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 13:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 14:09, Michael Edmiston
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 14:15, Caryn
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 14:21, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 14:24, Clarence Bennett
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 14:24, Caryn
Re: Cosmology
,
06/22/2004 15:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 15:05, John Denker
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 15:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cosmology
,
06/22/2004 20:40, Hugh Logan
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 21:02, John Clement
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/22/2004 21:56, Larry Cartwright
Re: Cosmology
,
06/23/2004 01:18, brian mcinnes
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/23/2004 10:11, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/23/2004 11:26, Larry Smith
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/23/2004 11:44, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/23/2004 12:37, Edmiston, Mike
double-hung pendulum (was periodic motion)
,
06/23/2004 12:54, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/23/2004 13:05, Brian Whatcott
Fwd: [rete] Passevin
,
06/23/2004 19:07, Brian Whatcott
Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/23/2004 19:23, Dan Folmar
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/23/2004 21:12, Brian Whatcott
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/23/2004 21:32, Daryl L. Taylor
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/23/2004 22:06, John Clement
Re: Periodic motion vs. oscillation
,
06/23/2004 22:54, John Denker
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/23/2004 23:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/23/2004 23:47, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/24/2004 03:40, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [rete] Passevin
,
06/24/2004 10:12, Folkerts, Timothy J
vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/24/2004 12:09, Debora Katz
Re: [rete] Passevin
,
06/24/2004 14:08, Tom Ford
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law?
,
06/25/2004 00:20, Richard Hake
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 11:59, Carl E. Mungan
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 12:44, Todd Pedlar
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 13:28, Hugh Haskell
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 15:06, John Denker
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 22:00, Bob LaMontagne
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 22:11, Caryn
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/25/2004 23:05, Bob LaMontagne
motional emf
,
06/26/2004 01:22, Kenny Stephens
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 08:18, Brian Whatcott
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 08:51, Hugh Logan
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 11:22, John Denker
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 12:07, Bob LaMontagne
Re: motional emf/meander
,
06/26/2004 13:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 13:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 25 Jun 2004 to 26 Jun 2004 (#2004-184)
,
06/26/2004 13:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 18:04, Carl Mungan
Re: motional emf
,
06/26/2004 18:07, Carl Mungan
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/26/2004 18:22, Carl Mungan
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/26/2004 20:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: motional emf --- thanks & another question
,
06/27/2004 00:29, Kenny Stephens
Re: motional emf
,
06/27/2004 03:25, John Denker
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/27/2004 04:01, brian mcinnes
Re: Reading Science Texts
,
06/27/2004 12:56, Richard Hake
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/27/2004 22:21, Carl Mungan
Re: motional emf
,
06/27/2004 23:07, Aaron Titus
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law? - PART 1
,
06/27/2004 23:52, Richard Hake
Re: Cool Demo for Newton's First Law? - PART 2
,
06/27/2004 23:53, Richard Hake
Re: motional emf
,
06/28/2004 11:04, Carl E. Mungan
Re: vibration vs. oscillation
,
06/28/2004 11:22, Carl E. Mungan
Re: motional emf
,
06/28/2004 12:34, John Denker
Re: motional emf
,
06/29/2004 06:50, Hugh Logan
Re: motional emf
,
06/29/2004 11:21, Carl E. Mungan
COLD FUSION
,
06/30/2004 07:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc