Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: molecular weight of dry air



The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics apparently words the description of
atomic mass in a manner inconsistent with the SI and with the CODATA.

One of the three "experimentally determined unit accepted for use with the
SI", according to the BIPM/CIPM, is the unified atomic mass unit, symbol u,
and according to the 1998 CODATA it has a value of 1.660 538 73(13) × 10^-27
kg. The parenthetical 13 indicates the uncertainty in the last two digits
given, 73 at one standard deviation.

Atomic mass has units of mass. That's where it gets its quantiy name. It can
be stated in kilograms (awkward), yoctograms (1 yg = 10^-24 g), or unified
atomic mass units. Thus, it is not dimensionless. Chemists, for reasons known
to themselves, may use a casual practice of omitting the "u" symbol and thus
making those values appear unitless, though they are not. By the way, I have
been told by a member of the CIPM's CCU that chemists may have finally
succeeded in their efforts to get the dalton (Da) accepted as a unit accepted
for use with the SI. It would replace the unified atomic mass unit (u).

The use of "weight" in atomic and molecular weights was changed to mass in
recognition of the use of the term "weight" to designate a gravitational
force of attraction (usually to the Earth).

Jim

On Thursday 13 May 2004 10:42, Ludwik Kowalski wrote:
According to a chemistry book "the molecular mass is a dimensionless
quality defined as the ratio of the average mass per molecule divided
by 1/12 of the mass of an atom of carbon-12. The term relative
molecular mass thus replaces the older term 'molecular weight' ."
Ludwik Kowalski

Robert Cohen asked:
Is there a difference between "atomic mass" and "atomic weight"?
I thought the average atomic mass (over the isotopes) was called
the atomic weight and so it is the atomic weight that is listed
on the periodic table, not the atomic mass. Is that incorrect?

--
James R. Frysinger
Lifetime Certified Advanced Metrication Specialist
Senior Member, IEEE

http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj
frysingerj@cofc.edu
j.frysinger@ieee.org

Office:
Physics Lab Manager, Lecturer
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
University/College of Charleston
66 George Street
Charleston, SC 29424
843.953.7644 (phone)
843.953.4824 (FAX)

Home:
10 Captiva Row
Charleston, SC 29407
843.225.0805