Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of May, 2003
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: Variable speed of light
,
05/01/2003 10:12, Robert Cohen
science&publicity
,
05/01/2003 15:25, Ramon Sala
Re: science&publicity
,
05/01/2003 16:10, Hugh Haskell
Re: science&publicity
,
05/01/2003 16:54, John S. Denker
Re: science&publicity
,
05/01/2003 16:58, Rick Tarara
Monthly technical Posting for PHYS-L
,
05/02/2003 13:30, Dan MacIsaac
Anncmt: MODELING WORKSHOPS nationwide in summer 2003
,
05/02/2003 17:24, Jane Jackson
http://www.thebreastcancersite.com
,
05/04/2003 17:59, Chuck Britton
Stipend for Summer Meeting
,
05/05/2003 10:13, Warren Hein
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/05/2003 10:21, Jon Bell
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/05/2003 11:32, Jack Uretsky
Mercury transit later this week
,
05/05/2003 11:44, Daniel MacIsaac
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/05/2003 12:35, Hugh Haskell
Re: Mercury transit later this week
,
05/05/2003 19:34, Michael Edmiston
Re: Mercury transit later this week
,
05/05/2003 22:58, Bernard Cleyet
Hiroshima and Nagasaki for Physics Teachers Workshop
,
05/06/2003 10:46, Warren Hein
Communicating large numbers
,
05/06/2003 11:26, David T. Marx
Re: A free b.d. and a centripedal force question
,
05/06/2003 13:59, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/06/2003 14:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/06/2003 14:09, Bob LaMontagne
Re: A free b.d. and a centripedal force question
,
05/06/2003 14:09, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A free b.d. and a centripedal force question
,
05/06/2003 14:39, John S. Denker
Re: A free b.d. and a centripedal force question
,
05/06/2003 14:49, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/06/2003 15:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Experimental verification of the relativity theory
,
05/06/2003 15:57, Bob LaMontagne
A free b.d. and a centripedal force question
,
05/06/2003 16:16, Muhsin Ogretme
Re: A free b.d. and a centripedal force question
,
05/06/2003 18:00, Muhsin Ogretme
Burning CD
,
05/06/2003 20:33, Ludwik Kowalski
3-way lamp problem
,
05/06/2003 22:10, Joe Heafner
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/06/2003 22:50, Michael Edmiston
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/06/2003 22:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/06/2003 23:22, Joe Heafner
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/06/2003 23:24, Joe Heafner
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/07/2003 00:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/07/2003 00:33, Joe Heafner
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/07/2003 02:03, Bernard Cleyet
Relativity and the premise x'=0 <-> x=vt
,
05/07/2003 03:09, Pentcho Valev
Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/07/2003 03:28, Pentcho Valev
Re: Variable speed of light (was: Relativity conundrum)
,
05/07/2003 09:41, Pentcho Valev
Re: 3-way lamp problem
,
05/07/2003 11:20, Roger Haar
worth a look
,
05/07/2003 17:55, Mike Smith
What makes science powerful?
,
05/07/2003 18:44, cliff parker
Re: worth a look
,
05/07/2003 18:50, Brian Whatcott
Question On Proton Decay.
,
05/07/2003 20:17, Robert B Zannelli
Re: worth a look
,
05/07/2003 22:31, Michael Porter
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/07/2003 22:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: worth a look
,
05/07/2003 23:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 00:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 01:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Question On Proton Decay.
,
05/08/2003 01:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 02:30, Herbert H Gottlieb
Logic in natural sciences (was: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/08/2003 03:45, Pentcho Valev
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 07:24, John S. Denker
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 09:13, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 09:28, Strickert, Rick
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/08/2003 09:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 10:18, Rick Tarara
Re: worth a look
,
05/08/2003 10:28, Julie Hilsenteger
Re: Burning CD
,
05/08/2003 10:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 10:42, Pentcho Valev
Textbooks - Are they effective?
,
05/08/2003 11:02, Dennis Jacobs
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 11:19, Strickert, Rick
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/08/2003 11:26, Jim Green
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 11:36, Rick Tarara
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 11:51, Brian Whatcott
Re: Burning CD
,
05/08/2003 12:05, Brian Whatcott
Fwd: AAPT Update 2003 Number 5
,
05/08/2003 15:35, Dr. Dan MacIsaac
Re: Question On Proton Decay.
,
05/08/2003 16:54, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Question On Proton Decay.
,
05/08/2003 18:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: Burning CD
,
05/08/2003 19:29, S Goelzer
Re: Question On Proton Decay.
,
05/08/2003 19:48, Robert B Zannelli
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 21:15, Larry Cartwright
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/08/2003 21:39, Hugh Haskell
lamp problem solved
,
05/09/2003 00:14, Joe Heafner
Re: Burning CD
,
05/09/2003 03:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/09/2003 03:34, Pentcho Valev
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/09/2003 04:04, Pentcho Valev
Doubly-Special Relativity
,
05/09/2003 09:16, Mark Sylvester
Doubly-Special Relativity - minor correction
,
05/09/2003 09:19, Mark Sylvester
conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 11:14, Carl E. Mungan
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 13:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 14:11, Bob Sciamanda
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 14:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 14:33, Robert Cohen
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 14:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructible substance)
,
05/09/2003 16:03, John S. Denker
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructiblesubstance)
,
05/10/2003 03:19, Pentcho Valev
Re: conservation of momentum (was Re: Heat as an indestructiblesubstance)
,
05/10/2003 12:14, Bob Sciamanda
TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/10/2003 12:48, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/10/2003 14:12, Jim Green
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/10/2003 19:21, Larry Cartwright
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/10/2003 19:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/10/2003 19:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/10/2003 22:01, cliff parker
total lunar eclipse Thursday night
,
05/10/2003 22:18, John S. Denker
Re: What makes science powerful?
,
05/11/2003 01:48, John Clement
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/11/2003 13:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/11/2003 19:45, Jim Green
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/11/2003 20:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/11/2003 21:44, Carl Mungan
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/11/2003 22:11, Chuck Britton
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/12/2003 01:06, Jim Green
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/12/2003 01:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 03:50, Pentcho Valev
Testing statistical thermo (was: Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything))
,
05/12/2003 04:35, Pentcho Valev
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 05:12, John S. Denker
FLOW?
,
05/12/2003 07:07, David Abineri
Re: FLOW?
,
05/12/2003 07:40, John S. Denker
Re: FLOW?
,
05/12/2003 08:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 08:32, Vern Lindberg
Re: Heat as an indestructible substance
,
05/12/2003 09:05, Pentcho Valev
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 11:08, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Variable speed of light (was: Relativity conundrum)
,
05/12/2003 11:23, Ken Caviness
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 11:46, Pentcho Valev
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 12:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 12:46, Tim Folkerts
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 13:09, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 13:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 14:11, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 14:54, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 14:56, Jim Green
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 15:06, Jim Green
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/12/2003 15:12, Jim Green
Re: Testing statistical thermo (was: Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything))
,
05/12/2003 15:24, Jim Green
Re: Testing statistical thermo (was: Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything))
,
05/12/2003 15:26, Bob LaMontagne
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 00:27, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 02:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Variable speed of light (was: Relativity conundrum)
,
05/13/2003 04:24, Pentcho Valev
"Statefunctionness" of entropy
,
05/13/2003 06:36, Pentcho Valev
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 10:10, Pentcho Valev
Re: Testing statistical thermo (was: Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything))
,
05/13/2003 10:28, Pentcho Valev
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 12:08, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 12:52, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 13:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 13:45, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 14:24, Bob LaMontagne
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 15:36, Jim Green
We need Science articles in Academic Exchange Quarterly
,
05/13/2003 16:03, Calvin Kalman
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 16:07, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 16:17, Bob LaMontagne
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 16:23, Jack Uretsky
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 16:44, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 17:47, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 20:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 20:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 20:36, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 20:44, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 21:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/13/2003 23:01, John S. Denker
Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/14/2003 03:48, Pentcho Valev
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/14/2003 14:18, John S. Denker
Re: TdS is not dQ or d(anything)
,
05/14/2003 16:41, Jack Uretsky
sticky shower curtains
,
05/15/2003 08:59, Carl E. Mungan
Re: sticky shower curtains
,
05/15/2003 09:17, Chuck Britton
Re: sticky shower curtains
,
05/15/2003 16:32, cliff parker
Re: sticky shower curtains
,
05/15/2003 18:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: sticky shower curtains
,
05/15/2003 19:02, Herbert H Gottlieb
shower curtains
,
05/16/2003 10:44, John Barrer
Re: sticky shower curtains
,
05/16/2003 22:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: shower curtains
,
05/16/2003 22:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/17/2003 04:07, Pentcho Valev
Re: shower curtains
,
05/17/2003 09:55, Steve Clark
Re: shower curtains
,
05/17/2003 12:27, Brian Whatcott
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/17/2003 20:32, Carl Mungan
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/17/2003 22:02, John S. Denker
Re: shower curtains
,
05/17/2003 22:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/17/2003 23:38, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/18/2003 00:01, John S. Denker
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/18/2003 00:17, John S. Denker
Shower Curtains
,
05/18/2003 11:33, Janet Bowman
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/18/2003 20:30, Carl Mungan
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/18/2003 21:25, John S. Denker
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/18/2003 22:30, Brian Whatcott
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/19/2003 07:21, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/19/2003 08:41, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/19/2003 10:14, John S. Denker
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/19/2003 11:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Non-conservative forces
,
05/19/2003 11:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Teaching at Sandhills
,
05/19/2003 12:31, Rick Swanson
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/19/2003 12:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/20/2003 04:20, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/20/2003 10:13, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/20/2003 10:46, Robert Cohen
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/20/2003 10:48, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/20/2003 11:13, Pentcho Valev
Space Physics Planning Questionnaire
,
05/20/2003 12:06, Mike Smith
some clever puzzles
,
05/20/2003 12:24, John S. Denker
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/20/2003 12:55, Brian Whatcott
Re: COLD FUSION
,
05/20/2003 18:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/21/2003 04:42, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/21/2003 08:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/21/2003 19:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/22/2003 03:56, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/22/2003 09:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/22/2003 10:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/22/2003 11:26, Pentcho Valev
SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos
,
05/24/2003 16:08, Robert B Zannelli
SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos
,
05/24/2003 16:16, Robert B Zannelli
Re: SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos
,
05/24/2003 16:21, Robert B Zannelli
SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos ( Last try)
,
05/24/2003 16:31, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/24/2003 23:57, Brian Whatcott
Re: SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos (fwd)
,
05/25/2003 14:33, Jack Uretsky
SR
,
05/25/2003 17:08, Jim Green
Re: SR
,
05/25/2003 18:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: SR
,
05/25/2003 22:29, Chuck Britton
Re: SR
,
05/26/2003 01:04, John S. Denker
Re: SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos (fwd)
,
05/26/2003 01:20, Robert B Zannelli
Re: SN1987A in Support of Tachyon Neutrinos (fwd)
,
05/26/2003 01:37, Robert B Zannelli
Re: SR
,
05/26/2003 03:21, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/26/2003 08:02, Pentcho Valev
Re: SR
,
05/26/2003 09:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: SR
,
05/26/2003 12:29, Brian Whatcott
Re: SR
,
05/26/2003 14:44, Chuck Britton
Re: using cinematography to anchor kinematics
,
05/26/2003 14:55, Richard Hake
Re: using cinematography to anchor kinematics
,
05/26/2003 22:29, Brian Whatcott
The second law of thermodynamics
,
05/27/2003 04:30, Pentcho Valev
shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 00:44, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 01:14, John S. Denker
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 10:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 11:37, Roger Haar
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 11:42, Larry Woolf
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 12:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: using cinematography to anchor kinematics
,
05/28/2003 13:16, Richard Hake
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 15:52, Stefan Jeglinski
Physics/Math "Tutoring" Suggestions?
,
05/28/2003 19:00, Bob Millen
Re: Physics/Math "Tutoring" Suggestions?
,
05/28/2003 21:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 22:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: Physics/Math "Tutoring" Suggestions?
,
05/28/2003 22:27, Bob Millen
Re: Physics/Math "Tutoring" Suggestions?
,
05/28/2003 22:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/28/2003 23:12, John S. Denker
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/29/2003 06:53, pvalev
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/29/2003 12:10, Roger Haar
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/29/2003 12:58, Brian Whatcott
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/29/2003 15:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/29/2003 20:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/30/2003 00:34, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/30/2003 02:51, Pentcho Valev
Relativity problem
,
05/30/2003 09:13, pvalev
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/30/2003 12:15, Roger Haar
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/30/2003 14:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/30/2003 23:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/31/2003 04:22, Pentcho Valev
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/31/2003 08:07, Brian Whatcott
capillary effect
,
05/31/2003 11:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: capillary effect
,
05/31/2003 14:51, Brian Whatcott
Re: capillary effect
,
05/31/2003 16:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Non-conservative forces in a liquid dielectric
,
05/31/2003 16:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: shock wave as pressure builds in a vacuum?
,
05/31/2003 17:27, John S. Denker
Re: capillary effect
,
05/31/2003 17:51, Brian Whatcott
Re: capillary effect
,
06/01/2003 00:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: capillary effect
,
06/01/2003 01:34, Bernard Cleyet
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc