Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: electrodynamic stability?



I don't know whether to trust this reference (www.awe.co . . .).

Look at the bottom of page 2 of:
http://web.mit.edu/6.014/www/handouts/lecture21_notes.pdf

This makes no reference to any different result for the relativistic case,
noting only that the plasma must be neutral for the pinch effect to win. Given
time I (you, too) will look into calculational details.

My guess is that the pinch effect wins in the "awe.co diode" for reasons (of
construction) other than just relativistic velocities.

Bob Sciamanda (W3NLV)
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
trebor@velocity.net
http://www.velocity.net/~trebor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Sciamanda" <trebor@VELOCITY.NET>
To: <PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: electrodynamic stability?


| In the non-relativistic case, no, it is not wrong - the electrical repulsion
| will overwhelm the magnetic "pinch attraction", unless help comes from other
| effects (eg. a lattice of positive ions). But . . .
| For the relativistic case (at least the conclusion) go to:
| http://www.awe.co.uk/main_site/scientific_and_technical/featured_areas/hydro
| dynamics/ppt-c3.htm
|
|
| Bob Sciamanda (W3NLV)
| Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
| trebor@velocity.net
| http://www.velocity.net/~trebor
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Bernard Cleyet" <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>
| To: <PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu>
| Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 7:03 PM
| Subject: Re: electrodynamic stability?
|
|
| | Is this then wrong?
| |
| | except at C
| |
| | pinch effect requires a neutral plasma (at low speeds?)
| |
| | 1.11e-17 * (3E8)^2 = ~1
| |
| | bc