Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I would like to respond to David Rutherford's argument that energy
is associated with both the heat gained by the surroundings (via
what he calls the transverse component velocity) and the kinetic
energy associated with the current (which he relates to the
longitudinal component velocity).
This is actually a common source of confusion for my students and so
I would like to see it better addressed than it has. DR is right
that, at any given time, only part of the energy (associated with
the kinetic energy of the electrons) will be converted to heat as
measured by the calorimeter experiment. However, the key point that
I think my students (if not DR) miss is that eventually the current
will stop. At that point, all of the energy will be dissipated to
the calorimeter. Consequently, the calorimeter should be measuring
*all* of the energy dissipated by the resistor (which, in turn, must
be equivalent to the initial energy stored by the capacitor since
the final current in the circuit is zero).