Re: Socratic Method

[Bernard Cleyet <anngeorg@PACBELL.NET>]

"But Socratic?  Why do you think they force fed him the hemlock?
URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY"

I thought it was because he made fun of the ruler's gods.

That's a no - no, even now.

bc



Richard Hake wrote:

> Please pardon this cross-pollinating response to:
>
> Phys-L <http://lists.nau.edu/archives/phys-l.html>,
>
> PhysLrnR <http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/physlrnr.html>,
>
> Physhare <http://lists.psu.edu/archives/physhare.html>,
>
> AP-Physics
> <http://lyris.collegeboard.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?site=collegeboard&enter=ap-physics>
>
> In his Phys-L post of 28 Nov 2002 19:35:33-0600 titled "Re: Socratic
> Method" Jack Uretsky wrote:
>
> URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY-URETSKY
> Please note that when I adopted revised versions of Dick Hake's
> delightful labs for use in a community college I carefully called
> them "Dialogue Labs". . .Uretsky 1993). . . and not "Socratic
> Dialogue Labs".
>
> This was because, some years before, I had been exposed to three

cut