Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
John C. wrote in part:
I believe some of this has been around, butunfortunately
most evaluationsreally show
do not really test for the types of things that
student gains.Economic
The SAT is actually highly correlated to Socio
Status (SES). Anpredictor
economist showed that colleges could get a better
of success by
explicitly including SES. . . .
Just to stir the waters a bit,
Is anybody surprised that SES is a good predictor of
success, academic and
otherwise? Does that fact invalidate the use of the
SAT? I would think
not.
The whole point of trying to raise your SES level is
to improve things for
you and your family. One aspect of that improvement
is a better education
for your children in K-12, which ought to translate
into better success in
College.
He then wrote:
The easiest way of improving SATreputation of
scores and college admissions is by getting the
being a "good"
school, and then by attracting high SES students.
But which is the cause and the effect? You are
simply saying you can
improve your SAT scores by cherry picking; well duh?
Even a low SES school could improve their scores a
lot, by making everybody
take the PSAT and then only letting the top 10% take
the SAT.
Joel R.
This posting is the position of the writer, not that
of SUNY-BSC, NAU or the AAPT.