Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I didn't say it was being made simple, only that you can do it
I really disagree with the idea that physics can be made so simple. It
is already evident from a current thread that acceleration is very
difficult to teach to upper levels. Having spent some years trying to
teach the acceleration concept to freshman has made me believe that
most of them are not old enough to 'get' rate of a rate. Does not
matter how many demos or activities ( I do many) - only a very few can
get it. Not their fault, they are not ready. The most they can
identify is change or no change in speed; rate of change is too hard.
According to the NH strands for curriculum, freshman should be studying
physics, chem, and earth sci. Our school does about 2 quarters physics
(heavy on energy), basic chemistry for 1 quarter, earth science for the
last quarter. Physics is then offered to Juniors and Seniors.
I prefer to have Juniors take physics. They are just about ready and
have finished Algebra and Geometry. Physics is hands-on and concrete
for most of my students. Students who then move on to the abstract
studies in chemistry are better prepared.