IMHO most of these miss the major reason for vigorously supporting
Lederman's Physics First program (Hake 2002a,b).
That reason is contained in the abstract to Hake (2002b):
"It is argued that Lederman's 'Physics First' regime, while not an
ideal ramp to science/math literacy for all students, SHOULD
NEVERTHELESS BE VIGOROUSLY SUPPORTED AS AN IMPORTANT OPENING BATTLE
IN THE FULL SCALE WAR ON SCIENCE/MATH ILLITERACY AS ENVISAGED BY THE
AAAS 'PROJECT 2061' . . . . <http://www.project2061.org/> . . . This
is because a widespread first physics course for ALL ninth graders
might:
(a) help to overcome some systemic roadblocks to science/math
literacy of the general population - MOST IMPORTANTLY THE SEVERE
DEARTH OF EFFECTIVE PRE-COLLEGE SCIENCE/MATH TEACHERS,
(b) enhance the numbers of physics major and graduate students,
through programs designed to provide a large corps of teachers
capable of EFFECTIVELY teaching physics to vast numbers of students
in the Physics-First schools: ninth-graders plus those taking
high-school honors and AP-physics courses."
Hake, R.R. 2002a. "Physics First: Precursor to Science/Math Literacy
for All?" Summer 2002 issue of the American Physical Society's "Forum
on Education Newsletter" <http://www.aps.org/units/fed/index.html> /
"Forum Newsletters" where "/" means "click on."; also online as ref.
19 at <http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/>.
Hake, R.R. 2002b. "Physics First: Opening Battle in the War on
Science/Math Illiteracy?" Submitted to the American Journal of
Physics on 27 June 2002; online as ref. 20 at
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/>.
This posting is the position of the writer, not that of SUNY-BSC, NAU or the AAPT.