Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of October, 2002
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
MacArthur Award
,
10/01/2002 08:15, Brian Whatcott
Re: North Pole
,
10/01/2002 08:19, Brian Whatcott
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 08:24, Tina Fanetti
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 08:26, Tina Fanetti
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 09:19, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 09:40, Edmiston, Mike
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 09:41, Tina Fanetti
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 09:57, Rick Tarara
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 10:13, Robert Cohen
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 10:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 12:08, John Barrer
looking for research and resources about web based labs
,
10/01/2002 13:49, ahmad alkhalifah
Request for Peer Reviewers for MERLOT
,
10/01/2002 14:51, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 16:19, Kossom
Re: looking for research and resources about web based labs
,
10/01/2002 16:24, Richard L. Bowman
Re: Tire marks on road
,
10/01/2002 17:09, Fakhruddin, Hasanbhai
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 19:25, Brian Whatcott
Re: elastic collisions
,
10/01/2002 19:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/01/2002 20:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 07:21, Thomas O'Neill
The Work Density Four-vector
,
10/02/2002 08:49, David Rutherford
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 09:07, John S. Denker
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 09:27, Rick Tarara
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 09:28, Tina Fanetti
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 09:44, Robert Cohen
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 10:14, Rick Tarara
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 13:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 14:10, Tina Fanetti
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 14:13, Bernard Cleyet
Earth's shadow
,
10/02/2002 17:25, Joe Heafner
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/02/2002 17:35, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/02/2002 17:56, Joe Heafner
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/02/2002 18:13, Edmiston, Mike
teaching vectors
,
10/02/2002 18:46, Raeghan Graessle
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/02/2002 19:35, Hugh Haskell
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 20:49, John Clement
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/02/2002 20:59, John Clement
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/02/2002 21:05, John Clement
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/02/2002 21:32, Rick Tarara
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/02/2002 21:45, Joe Heafner
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/03/2002 08:22, Tina Fanetti
Re: need for geometry (was pass/fail)
,
10/03/2002 08:28, Tina Fanetti
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/03/2002 09:21, Tom Ford
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/03/2002 09:49, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: grades, pass/fail etc.
,
10/03/2002 10:17, QUIST, OREN
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/03/2002 11:20, Jared Rastoka
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/03/2002 11:49, John S. Denker
Standards for physics lab tables?
,
10/03/2002 12:07, Gonzalez-Espada, Wilson
GRE(CS) cancelled
,
10/03/2002 12:39, John S. Denker
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/03/2002 13:34, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/03/2002 14:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/03/2002 17:59, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Standards for physics lab tables?
,
10/03/2002 20:13, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/03/2002 20:21, Joe Heafner
Re: Standards for physics lab tables?
,
10/03/2002 20:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Standards for physics lab tables?
,
10/03/2002 21:54, Tina Fanetti
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/03/2002 22:04, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Earth's shadow
,
10/03/2002 23:01, Joe Heafner
Physics book in Japanese
,
10/03/2002 23:05, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Standards for physics lab tables?
,
10/04/2002 08:30, Peter Schoch
Foucault pendulum applet
,
10/04/2002 10:33, Joe Heafner
I need your opinion
,
10/04/2002 11:12, Lucy Vaysman
Re: Standards for physics lab tables?
,
10/04/2002 11:58, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Foucault pendulum applet
,
10/04/2002 14:09, Bob Sciamanda
Have a Physics Question
,
10/04/2002 14:32, Jim Green
Re: Have a Physics Question
,
10/04/2002 15:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Have a Physics Question
,
10/04/2002 16:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: Foucault pendulum applet
,
10/04/2002 16:47, paul o johnson
Re: Foucault pendulum applet
,
10/04/2002 22:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 02:33, Jim Green
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 09:31, paul o johnson
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 10:19, Michael Edmiston
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 10:34, John Clement
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 11:02, John Mallinckrodt
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 11:57, Bob LaMontagne
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 12:47, John S. Denker
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 13:41, Hugh Haskell
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 13:59, John S. Denker
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 18:12, Michael Edmiston
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 19:01, Jim Green
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 19:11, Jim Green
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 19:29, John S. Denker
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 19:44, Michael Edmiston
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 20:28, John Clement
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 20:35, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 20:39, Michael Edmiston
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 22:35, Brian Whatcott
Re: North Pole
,
10/05/2002 23:50, John S. Denker
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 01:24, Michael Edmiston
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 02:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 05:20, David Bowman
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 09:31, John S. Denker
Re: need for geometry (was pass/fail)
,
10/06/2002 10:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 10:04, John Clement
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 10:20, John S. Denker
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 12:18, Michael Edmiston
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 13:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 14:21, John Clement
Re: North Pole
,
10/06/2002 16:02, John S. Denker
Lunar North Pole and Seasons
,
10/06/2002 18:18, Kossom
Re: Lunar North Pole and Seasons
,
10/06/2002 18:56, John S. Denker
Disclaimers
,
10/06/2002 19:44, Michael Edmiston
Re: Radical School ('schools' within a school)
,
10/07/2002 01:15, Jane Jackson
proper definition of a "point particle"
,
10/07/2002 08:41, Aaron Titus
MentorNet
,
10/07/2002 08:43, Warren Hein
Re: Disclaimers
,
10/07/2002 09:08, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: proper definition of a "point particle"
,
10/07/2002 09:08, John Mallinckrodt
Re: teaching vectors
,
10/07/2002 09:27, S Goelzer
Re: Disclaimers
,
10/07/2002 10:38, Dan MacIsaac
Re: proper definition of a "point particle"
,
10/07/2002 11:50, Jack Uretsky
Who does take responsibility ;-)
,
10/07/2002 12:14, SSHS KPHOX
Work-energy worries
,
10/07/2002 13:11, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: North Pole
,
10/07/2002 18:16, Gary Turner
Re: North Pole
,
10/07/2002 21:38, John S. Denker
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/07/2002 21:57, John S. Denker
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/07/2002 23:21, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: North Pole
,
10/07/2002 23:31, Bernard Cleyet
Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 02:41, Michael Edmiston
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/08/2002 03:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 06:54, John S. Denker
Re: North Pole
,
10/08/2002 09:18, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 09:42, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 11:57, Dan MacIsaac
graphic drawing tools
,
10/08/2002 11:58, John S. Denker
GA again
,
10/08/2002 12:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 13:05, Joe Heafner
Today's advertisement.
,
10/08/2002 14:42, E Muehleisen
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/08/2002 18:06, Jim Green
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/08/2002 19:06, Larry Smith
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/08/2002 19:22, Stephen Murray
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/08/2002 19:30, Tina Fanetti
arons and dry ice
,
10/08/2002 19:33, Justin Parke
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/08/2002 19:42, cliff parker
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 19:42, Joe Heafner
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/08/2002 19:54, Justin Parke
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/08/2002 20:16, Stephen Murray
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/08/2002 22:14, Tina Fanetti
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/08/2002 22:22, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/08/2002 23:56, Larry Woolf
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 00:49, John S. Denker
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/09/2002 00:51, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/09/2002 01:47, John S. Denker
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 01:49, Bernard Cleyet
My dog ate my homework
,
10/09/2002 02:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet
,
10/09/2002 02:14, Jim Green
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 06:00, Justin Parke
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 06:07, Justin Parke
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 07:39, David Bowman
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 07:46, John Barrer
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 08:29, Sam Sampere
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 09:08, Joseph Bellina
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 09:24, Greenberg, Jon
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 09:33, John S. Denker
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 09:59, Joseph Bellina
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/09/2002 10:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 10:34, Rick Tarara
Re: MentorNet
,
10/09/2002 10:42, Richard Hake
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 10:47, paul johnson
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 11:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 11:40, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/09/2002 11:45, John S. Denker
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 11:55, Larry Woolf
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 12:03, Larry Smith
Arons and Dry Ice
,
10/09/2002 12:28, Richard Hake
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 12:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 12:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: inertia demo
,
10/09/2002 13:11, S Goelzer
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/09/2002 14:08, Larry Smith
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 14:26, Joe Heafner
Why Physics First?
,
10/09/2002 14:28, Richard Hake
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 14:58, David Bowman
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 15:03, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/09/2002 15:16, Jim Green
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 15:31, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 15:33, S Goelzer
Re: Arons and Dry Ice
,
10/09/2002 15:36, Larry Woolf
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/09/2002 15:37, David Bowman
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/09/2002 15:37, Justin Parke
Humorous exam answers!
,
10/09/2002 15:40, Ruth Wolfson
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 15:41, Joseph Bellina
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/09/2002 15:48, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Arons and Dry Ice
,
10/09/2002 16:18, Bernard Cleyet
test
,
10/09/2002 16:24, Joseph Bellina
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/09/2002 16:28, Mariam Dittmann
Re: Arons and Dry Ice
,
10/09/2002 16:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/09/2002 16:45, Larry Smith
Re: Arons and Dry Ice
,
10/09/2002 16:58, Larry Woolf
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 17:06, Joe Heafner
Re: deceleration
,
10/09/2002 17:42, John Barrer
Re: arons and dry ice
,
10/09/2002 18:28, Robert Cohen
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/09/2002 18:38, Jack Uretsky
Documentary Film Search
,
10/09/2002 18:43, Brian Whatcott
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/09/2002 18:46, Richard Hake
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/09/2002 20:57, John Clement
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/09/2002 21:09, Brian Whatcott
Re: Star Hopping
,
10/09/2002 21:17, Brian Whatcott
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/09/2002 22:07, Fran Poodry
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/09/2002 22:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/10/2002 01:41, Jim Green
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/10/2002 03:36, Michael Bowen
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/10/2002 07:49, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/10/2002 07:53, Trina L. Short
Re: Humorous exam answers!
,
10/10/2002 08:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 09:09, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 09:37, David Bonar
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 10:19, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 10:42, Justin Parke
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 11:38, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Why Physics First? Doubling-up
,
10/10/2002 11:54, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 12:02, John Barrer
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/10/2002 12:04, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 12:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 12:39, Hugh Haskell
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 12:45, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 12:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 14:37, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/10/2002 14:48, Jim Green
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 14:57, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 14:59, Hugh Haskell
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 15:00, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 15:13, Joseph Bellina
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 15:19, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 15:29, Larry Woolf
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 15:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 16:42, John Barrer
Bourbaki
,
10/10/2002 16:43, Laurent Hodges
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 16:43, S Goelzer
Physics First Content
,
10/10/2002 16:45, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 17:00, Hugh Haskell
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 17:46, Richard Hake
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/10/2002 20:49, John Clement
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/10/2002 21:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/10/2002 22:02, John Clement
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 00:03, Frohne, Vickie
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 00:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 00:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 09:16, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Physics First Content
,
10/11/2002 09:31, Edmiston, Mike
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 09:32, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 09:34, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 09:44, Joe Heafner
Re: Physics First Content
,
10/11/2002 10:49, Rick Tarara
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 11:01, James Mackey
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/11/2002 11:04, Larry Smith
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 11:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Physics First Content
,
10/11/2002 13:10, Hugh Haskell
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 13:14, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Why Physics First?
,
10/11/2002 13:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 13:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/11/2002 13:35, Chuck Britton
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/11/2002 13:47, Larry Woolf
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/11/2002 13:50, Larry Smith
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 14:05, Bernard Cleyet
Work-energy worries--Esoterica
,
10/11/2002 14:14, John Mallinckrodt
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 14:19, Jim Green
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/11/2002 14:48, Carl E. Mungan
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 14:55, Hugh Haskell
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/11/2002 15:02, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/11/2002 15:05, Strickert, Rick
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 15:08, James Mackey
Re: Physics First Content
,
10/11/2002 15:15, Edmiston, Mike
? about FinderScope.com
,
10/11/2002 15:32, Sheron Snyder
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 15:53, John Barrer
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 16:28, Hugh Haskell
Re: elastic collisions
,
10/11/2002 16:57, Carl E. Mungan
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 17:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Physics First Content (refocus)
,
10/11/2002 17:11, SSHS KPHOX
Physics First
,
10/11/2002 17:53, E Muehleisen
Re: Physics First Content (refocus)
,
10/11/2002 18:04, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Physics First Content
,
10/11/2002 18:12, Vern Dewees
Re: Physics First Content (refocus)
,
10/11/2002 18:29, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Work-energy worries
,
10/11/2002 19:17, Jim Green
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/11/2002 19:56, Jim Green
Re: Physics First Content (refocus)
,
10/11/2002 20:15, John Clement
A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/11/2002 23:48, Brian Whatcott
Re: Physics First Content (refocus)
,
10/12/2002 06:38, John Barrer
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/12/2002 08:44, John Clement
Re: Physics First Content (refocus)
,
10/12/2002 10:21, Fran Poodry
Re: Star Hopping, green laser pointers
,
10/12/2002 10:47, Michael Edmiston
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/12/2002 13:06, Jack Uretsky
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/12/2002 14:47, Rosaline Secrest
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/12/2002 16:05, Hugh Haskell
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/12/2002 17:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/12/2002 18:07, Jim Green
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/12/2002 21:54, John Clement
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/12/2002 22:36, John Clement
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/12/2002 23:54, Hugh Haskell
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/13/2002 00:21, Hugh Haskell
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/13/2002 10:26, John Clement
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/13/2002 12:23, Bob LaMontagne
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash.
,
10/13/2002 13:01, SSHS KPHOX
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/13/2002 13:55, Rosaline Secrest
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/13/2002 14:01, John Clement
Free Fall Animations
,
10/13/2002 17:03, Ahmed Alkhalifah
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/13/2002 17:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/13/2002 17:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/13/2002 18:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/13/2002 18:22, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/13/2002 18:22, John Clement
poor man's free-fall animation in excel
,
10/13/2002 18:33, Michael J. Moloney
Re: free fall animations
,
10/13/2002 19:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Improving opportunities for middle school females; Was Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/13/2002 20:18, Larry Woolf
Re: Physics First Content (refocus) PART 1
,
10/13/2002 21:27, Richard Hake
Re: Physics First Content (refocus) PART 2
,
10/13/2002 21:27, Richard Hake
Re: poor man's free-fall animation in excel
,
10/13/2002 23:41, Larry Cartwright
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/14/2002 01:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 03:10, Bernard Cleyet
The Work Density Four-vector; Revision
,
10/14/2002 03:39, David Rutherford
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 03:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Free Fall Animations
,
10/14/2002 09:23, Mason, Bruce A
Re: poor man's free-fall animation in excel
,
10/14/2002 09:50, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Physics First Content (refocus) PART 1
,
10/14/2002 12:03, Larry Woolf
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 12:38, Richard Hake
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 13:19, Frohne, Vickie
Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 13:30, Gary Turner
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 14:06, John S. Denker
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 14:12, John Mallinckrodt
Gender Terms (was MentorNet)
,
10/14/2002 14:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 14:25, Rick Tarara
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 14:31, Brian Whatcott
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 14:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 14:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 15:00, Rick Tarara
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 15:57, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 16:18, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 16:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 16:35, Rick Tarara
Re: Gender Terms (was MentorNet)
,
10/14/2002 16:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 16:58, John S. Denker
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/14/2002 17:12, Gary Turner
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 17:23, Richard Hake
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 18:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 18:11, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Gender Terms (was MentorNet)
,
10/14/2002 19:55, Richard Hake
Re: Gender Terms (was MentorNet)
,
10/14/2002 20:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response)
,
10/14/2002 20:32, John Clement
Why Physics First? - Summary - PART 1
,
10/16/2002 00:45, Richard Hake
Why Physics First? - Summary - PART 2
,
10/16/2002 00:45, Richard Hake
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/16/2002 10:43, paul johnson
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/16/2002 11:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electric fields and points of stability
,
10/16/2002 11:39, John S. Denker
Work and Energy
,
10/16/2002 11:50, John Milton
GA once again
,
10/16/2002 13:20, Jack Uretsky
What is this?
,
10/17/2002 22:42, Michael Porter
Re: What is this?
,
10/17/2002 23:00, Brian Whatcott
Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 08:26, Tina Fanetti
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 09:20, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 09:25, Tina Fanetti
Re: What is this?
,
10/18/2002 09:31, Joseph Bellina
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 09:40, Rick Tarara
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 10:00, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 10:07, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 11:43, Larry Cartwright
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 11:53, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 11:59, John S. Denker
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 12:10, Edmiston, Mike
FW: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 12:11, Larry Woolf
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 12:46, Tina Fanetti
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 12:57, Tina Fanetti
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 13:11, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 13:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
More thoughts on Lazy
,
10/18/2002 13:45, Tina Fanetti
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 14:12, David Bonar
Re: More thoughts on Lazy
,
10/18/2002 15:06, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 15:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: More thoughts on Lazy
,
10/18/2002 15:16, Tina Fanetti
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 15:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 15:20, Bernard Cleyet
Astronomy labs (Was: More thoughts on Lazy)
,
10/18/2002 16:11, Frohne, Vickie
Re: What is this?
,
10/18/2002 16:19, Michael Porter
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 16:38, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: What is this?
,
10/18/2002 17:21, Edmiston, Mike
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response) - PART 1
,
10/18/2002 18:17, Richard Hake
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response) - PART 2
,
10/18/2002 18:18, Richard Hake
Re: Lazy?
,
10/18/2002 18:20, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Physics First Content (refocus) PART 1
,
10/18/2002 19:06, Larry Woolf
Re: Astronomy labs
,
10/18/2002 20:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: Lazy?
,
10/19/2002 02:35, Nathaniel Davis
Re: books, web, etc. (was: lazy?)
,
10/19/2002 09:33, John S. Denker
Astro Physical Geology
,
10/19/2002 09:52, paul o johnson
Re: Astro Physical Geology
,
10/19/2002 10:31, John S. Denker
Re: Lazy?
,
10/19/2002 11:50, Larry Cartwright
Re: stacks, catalog, search-engine
,
10/19/2002 12:06, John S. Denker
FCI in Spanish,German,Chinese,Malaysian,Finnish,Turkish
,
10/19/2002 12:51, Jane Jackson
Re: Astro Physical Geology
,
10/19/2002 13:47, paul o johnson
Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/19/2002 14:21, Mr. Rich Schram
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 01:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 01:22, Hugh Haskell
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 01:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 01:46, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 02:31, John Mallinckrodt
Unsubscribe
,
10/20/2002 08:35, S Bell -Add new subscriber to mailing list
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 10:13, Chuck Britton
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 10:23, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 10:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 10:53, John Clement
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 11:26, Michael Edmiston
Re: MentorNet (one woman's response) - PART 1
,
10/20/2002 11:31, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 11:50, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 11:51, Rick Tarara
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 12:03, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 12:23, Joe Heafner
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 12:33, Rick Tarara
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 12:39, Michael Edmiston
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/20/2002 13:45, Hugh Haskell
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 17:47, MERVIN KOEHLINGER
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 18:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 19:09, Hugh Haskell
Re: Work and Energy
,
10/20/2002 19:13, John Mallinckrodt
Question On Down Conversion.
,
10/20/2002 19:26, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 20:14, Michael Edmiston
Student Evaluations (Was: Lazy?)
,
10/20/2002 20:32, John Clement
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 20:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 21:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Lazy?
,
10/20/2002 23:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: More thoughts on Lazy
,
10/20/2002 23:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Astronomy labs
,
10/21/2002 04:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Lazy?
,
10/21/2002 04:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: What is this?
,
10/21/2002 08:39, Tina Fanetti
Re: More thoughts on Lazy
,
10/21/2002 09:13, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Student Evaluations (Was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 09:17, RAUBER, JOEL
easy (was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 10:46, Larry Smith
Re: easy (was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 11:09, Tina Fanetti
Re: easy (was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 11:51, Bob LaMontagne
Re: What is this?
,
10/21/2002 12:37, Bernard Cleyet
Student Evaluations (Was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 12:58, Richard Hake
Re: What is this?
,
10/21/2002 13:23, Michael Porter
Above average (Was Re: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 13:42, Tim Folkerts
DVD back ups?
,
10/21/2002 16:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: easy (was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 20:17, John Clement
Re: easy (was: Lazy?)
,
10/21/2002 22:35, Herbert H Gottlieb
momentum
,
10/22/2002 03:51, Vernon Clarke
Re: DVD back ups?
,
10/22/2002 08:10, B. Esser
[Fwd: Re: What is this?]
,
10/22/2002 11:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: DVD back ups?
,
10/22/2002 12:46, Hugh Haskell
Re: More thoughts on Lazy
,
10/22/2002 12:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Teaching Problem Solving - Moore Method
,
10/22/2002 13:02, Richard Hake
Re: DVD back ups?
,
10/22/2002 13:23, Chuck Britton
Re: DVD back ups? OSX-free
,
10/22/2002 13:36, Charlie Goodspeed
Re: DVD back ups?
,
10/22/2002 14:34, J Montgomery
Re: DVD back ups?
,
10/22/2002 14:42, Hugh Haskell
Re: DVD back ups? OSX-free
,
10/22/2002 17:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: iPod backups
,
10/22/2002 18:09, Larry Smith
Re: DVD back ups? OSX-free
,
10/22/2002 18:36, Hugh Haskell
Re: Teaching Problem Solving - Moore Method
,
10/23/2002 17:14, Paul M. Rybski
Re: iPod backups
,
10/23/2002 21:03, John Clement
Leonid Meteor shower
,
10/23/2002 21:45, Peter Schoch
Re: Lazy?
,
10/23/2002 23:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: A Bio And A Movie: Nash/epilog
,
10/24/2002 00:52, Brian Whatcott
Re: iPod backups
,
10/24/2002 01:35, Keith Tipton
AJP Stone Skipping article makes CBC national news
,
10/24/2002 08:16, Dan MacIsaac
High School Version Mech Univ
,
10/24/2002 12:14, Greg Bush
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/24/2002 14:05, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Work and Energy
,
10/24/2002 14:13, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/24/2002 14:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Looking for mathematics attitudes/beliefs instrument - OOPS!
,
10/24/2002 19:22, Richard Hake
Re: Work and Energy
,
10/24/2002 23:22, Joe Heafner
Re: Work and Energy
,
10/25/2002 01:02, Jim Green
Re: Question On Down Conversion.
,
10/25/2002 06:56, John S. Denker
Re: momentum
,
10/25/2002 07:24, John S. Denker
I need Information about electronics teachers
,
10/25/2002 08:38, Roberto Carabajal
Re: momentum
,
10/25/2002 09:23, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: I need Information about electronics teachers
,
10/25/2002 09:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: I need Information about electronics teachers
,
10/25/2002 12:59, Brian Whatcott
the passing of our friend Larry Martin
,
10/25/2002 13:30, Aaron Titus
a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/25/2002 14:27, Carl E. Mungan
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/25/2002 15:14, Bob LaMontagne
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/25/2002 16:49, John Mallinckrodt
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/25/2002 20:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/25/2002 20:58, Glenn Knapp
colored rubber balls?
,
10/25/2002 21:03, Joe Heafner
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/26/2002 04:35, Tore Ottinsen
No Child Left Behind
,
10/26/2002 04:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/26/2002 08:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: colored rubber balls?
,
10/26/2002 09:08, Sheron Snyder
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/26/2002 09:39, Brian Whatcott
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/26/2002 09:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/26/2002 09:50, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Looking for a good lab for angular momentum conservation
,
10/26/2002 10:30, Richard Hake
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/26/2002 14:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Hewitt Special Relativity Example (Long)
,
10/26/2002 14:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: colored rubber balls?
,
10/26/2002 15:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: colored rubber balls?
,
10/26/2002 17:28, Joe Heafner
Re: No Child Left Behind
,
10/26/2002 23:33, John Clement
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/27/2002 00:31, Brian Whatcott
Twin paradox (Was: Hewitt Special Relativity Exa mple (long))
,
10/27/2002 07:58, Savinainen Antti
GA in high schools?
,
10/27/2002 08:02, Savinainen Antti
Reference frame of photon?
,
10/27/2002 08:03, Savinainen Antti
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/27/2002 09:33, John Clement
Re: No Child Left Behind
,
10/27/2002 09:59, John Clement
X-ray peaks
,
10/27/2002 10:23, Savinainen Antti
Re: Reference frame of photon?
,
10/27/2002 10:46, John S. Denker
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/27/2002 14:18, John S. Denker
Re: Reference frame of photon?
,
10/27/2002 14:21, David Bowman
Re: X-ray peaks
,
10/27/2002 14:33, Michael Edmiston
Re: X-ray peaks
,
10/27/2002 14:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/27/2002 14:56, Jack Uretsky
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/27/2002 15:04, Carl E. Mungan
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/27/2002 15:14, Bob LaMontagne
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/27/2002 15:29, Robert Cohen
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/27/2002 15:35, David Bowman
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/27/2002 17:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/27/2002 20:18, John Clement
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/27/2002 21:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/27/2002 23:38, John Clement
Features of FLAG - was Looking for mathematics attitudes/beliefs instrument
,
10/27/2002 23:49, Richard Hake
When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 00:11, John Clement
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 00:34, John Mallinckrodt
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 00:56, John Clement
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 01:27, Michael Bowen
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/28/2002 02:25, Tore Ottinsen
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 04:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 08:12, Brian Whatcott
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/28/2002 08:17, John Mallinckrodt
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 09:01, Tina Fanetti
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 09:19, Herb Schulz
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 09:39, David Bowman
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 10:17, John S. Denker
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 10:37, QUIST, OREN
Re: a surprising escape speed problem
,
10/28/2002 10:42, Carl E. Mungan
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 10:43, John Mallinckrodt
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 10:45, David Bowman
Re: X-ray peaks
,
10/28/2002 10:46, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/28/2002 12:03, David Bowman
cold fusion LONG!
,
10/28/2002 12:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 12:15, Bob LaMontagne
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 12:56, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 14:03, Larry Woolf
A Century of Physics posters
,
10/28/2002 14:11, Joe Heafner
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 14:23, Michael Bowen
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 14:24, John Mallinckrodt
century of physics posters
,
10/28/2002 14:29, Pat Viele
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 15:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A Century of Physics posters
,
10/28/2002 15:13, Sam Sampere
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 15:54, Gary Turner
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 16:46, Bob LaMontagne
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 16:49, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Looking for mathematics attitudes/beliefs instrument
,
10/28/2002 17:00, Karl I. Trappe
Re: A Century of Physics posters
,
10/28/2002 17:01, Joe Heafner
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 18:05, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 18:12, Bob LaMontagne
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 18:27, QUIST, OREN
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/28/2002 18:36, Robert Cohen
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/28/2002 20:15, John S. Denker
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/28/2002 22:01, Larry Cartwright
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/28/2002 23:04, John Clement
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 07:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 09:35, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/29/2002 09:40, Robert Cohen
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 09:46, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Special Relativity
,
10/29/2002 10:12, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Looking for mathematics attitudes/beliefs instrument
,
10/29/2002 10:13, Chuck Britton
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 10:30, John Mallinckrodt
Rough Science
,
10/29/2002 11:10, Strickert, Rick
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 11:40, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Rough Science
,
10/29/2002 12:25, Ivan Rouse
Continued problems with line breaks and extra characters.
,
10/29/2002 12:57, Edmiston, Mike
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 12:59, John Mallinckrodt
Publishing papers in Science
,
10/29/2002 13:07, Calvin Kalman
Re: Rough Science
,
10/29/2002 15:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Question On Down Conversion.
,
10/29/2002 15:36, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Continued problems with line breaks and extra characters.
,
10/29/2002 16:03, Ludwik Kowalski
My e-mail test - Please Ignore
,
10/29/2002 16:38, Edmiston, Mike
My e-mail test - Please Ignore
,
10/29/2002 16:47, Edmiston, Mike
My-email test. Please Ignore
,
10/29/2002 16:54, Edmiston, Mike
Re: My-email test. Please Ignore
,
10/29/2002 17:45, Michael Bowen
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 19:25, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 21:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 22:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Cold fusion
,
10/29/2002 23:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/29/2002 23:14, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 00:42, John Mallinckrodt
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 03:33, Bob Sciamanda
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 06:52, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 07:44, Brian Whatcott
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 08:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 09:23, QUIST, OREN
Re: When Physical Intuition Fails
,
10/30/2002 10:12, Edmiston, Mike
High School Physics Position 1/3/03
,
10/30/2002 16:58, Sandin
Re: GA in high schools?
,
10/31/2002 04:27, Savinainen Antti
computers in eduction
,
10/31/2002 11:12, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: GA in high schools?
,
10/31/2002 11:37, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Applications are now being accepted for a tenure-track assistant professorship in the Department of Physics at UW-Whitewater
,
10/31/2002 15:56, Paul M. Rybski
Re: GA in high schools?
,
10/31/2002 16:33, John S. Denker
Re: Looking for mathematics attitudes/beliefs instrument
,
01/01/2004 18:01, Richard Hake
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc