Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Joseph Bellina wrote:
I'd like to make an arguement for using the "SCIENTIFIC METHOD" with young
children...though I'm not sure what I would define as young. The SM thing
began as we know in a time when decisions were made not on the basis of
reason for the most part. Seems to me that it is still a good place to
start if we are going to teach logical thinking.
I believe that we need to be verrrrrry careful what we foist off on the
young. It is well documented that what a very young child learns is
internalized and retained for a very long time in one way or another,
for better or worse. IMHO, representing any fiction as truth to even
the youngest of children is an act of disrespect.
I continue to be amazed at the level of intellectual sophistication
which even quite young children can process, appreciate and understand.
I believe we need to take that into careful consideration in deciding
how to represent our understanding of the world to them.
Best wishes,
Larry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Larry Cartwright <exit60@cablespeed.com>
Retired Physics Teacher
Charlotte MI 48813 USA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Information is not knowledge,
knowledge is not wisdom,
and wisdom is not foresight.
Each grows out of the other
and we need them all."
(Arthur C. Clarke)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~