Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
It would seem that in discussing this issue we would
be more careful
about broad sweeping statements about either
viewpoint. There are a
number here that I would question..
"VERY well-organized groups who seem to have as
their goal a Christian
theocracy in this country." Do you mean all of
these groups who want to see some presentation of
alternative views of origins are seeking to
establish a religeous thoecracy in this country?
"All too often, the forces of reason fight reactive
battles."
Does this mean that all those on the other side do
not use reason in their arguments also?
"Unless this changes, we will continue to have
"leaders" who rely on
repetition and volume as a substitute for thought."
I'm not sure who "leaders" are here unless they are
political leaders?
Is this true of all?
James Mackey
John Barrer wrote:
This ongoing thread has been a great read. One canto
only hope that as the (reported) large cohort of
science teachers retire, they become politically
active and provide effective offensive (as opposed
defensive) opposition to the VERY well-organizedforces
groups who seem to have as their goal a Christian
theocracy in this country. All too often, the
of reason fight reactive battles. Unless thischanges,
we will continue to have "leaders" who rely on
repetition and volume as a substitute for thought.
John Barrere
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com