Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
For some reason, this question called to mind the current advice offered
to organizers of wilderness/camping excursions.
Rather than providing the traditional midden consisting of a trench and
seats,
one is adjured to advise each participant to locate a new place at a few
minutes
walk from the campsite, for every defecation, and to dig a hole, use it and
cover it after one use.
Apparently, the biosystem handles low concentrations of human waste more
successfully than central dumps.
Brian
At 12:17 PM 8/1/02, you wrote:
Which is better a semi random scattering of radioactives through the
earth as found in nature or a highly studied and reasonably designed
site picked by humans?
James Mackey
*******************************************************************
Rick Tarara wrote:
bc who thinks keeping it where it is "created" is a better plan.
Besides it must for five years (if no Sr. moment).
Leaving it where it is increases Radon exposure with some statistical
probability of increased numbers or Radon induced cancers.
Cheers,
Rick
Brian Whatcott
Altus OK Eureka!