Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Which is better a semi random scattering of radioactives through the
earth as found in nature or a highly studied and reasonably designed
site picked by humans?
James Mackey
*******************************************************************
Rick Tarara wrote:
bc who thinks keeping it where it is "created" is a better plan.
> Besides it must for five years (if no Sr. moment).
>
Leaving it where it is increases Radon exposure with some statistical
probability of increased numbers or Radon induced cancers.
Cheers,
Rick