Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of August, 2002
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Smoke-ring guns at Boise
,
08/01/2002 05:55, William Beaty
Re: Big money in the electrostatics biz
,
08/01/2002 07:07, Miguel A. Santos
Re: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty
,
08/01/2002 10:04, James McLean
Re: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty
,
08/01/2002 10:18, Hugh Haskell
Unpolarized light
,
08/01/2002 10:53, James McLean
Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/01/2002 10:56, John Clement
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/01/2002 11:09, Joseph Bellina
Re: Unpolarized light
,
08/01/2002 12:20, John S. Denker
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/01/2002 12:32, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/01/2002 13:17, James Mackey
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/01/2002 13:23, James Mackey
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/01/2002 13:56, Rick Tarara
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/01/2002 15:38, Bernard Cleyet
Yucca Mtn transport issues
,
08/01/2002 17:40, John Barrer
Re: Yucca Mtn transport issues
,
08/01/2002 18:16, Hugh Haskell
Re: Yucca Mtn transport issues
,
08/01/2002 18:44, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/01/2002 19:30, Barry Gragg
Just for grins
,
08/01/2002 19:46, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/02/2002 00:15, William Beaty
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/02/2002 00:34, Hugh Haskell
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/02/2002 04:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty
,
08/02/2002 09:03, William Beaty
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/02/2002 09:15, Pat Keeney
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/02/2002 12:24, James Mackey
FCI question subjects & correlations
,
08/02/2002 13:36, Tim Folkerts
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/02/2002 15:11, William Beaty
Re: Yucca Mtn transport issues
,
08/02/2002 16:10, John Barrer
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/02/2002 16:41, Mike Smith
Re: Yucca Mtn transport issues
,
08/02/2002 17:47, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty)
,
08/02/2002 18:14, William Beaty
The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/02/2002 19:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: the Zapno (tm) anti-static device and dishonesty
,
08/02/2002 19:47, Bill Thorp
Re: The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/03/2002 01:02, Jim Green
Re: The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/03/2002 08:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Nuclear waste; was Yucca Mtn ...
,
08/03/2002 09:24, Ludwik Kowalski
halfdecade
,
08/03/2002 11:59, Jim Green
Re: Big money in the electrostatics biz
,
08/03/2002 12:47, John Clement
Re: halfdecade
,
08/03/2002 13:37, John Clement
Re: halfdecade
,
08/03/2002 14:21, Paul O. Johnson
Re: The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/03/2002 16:03, Jack Uretsky
Tracing things back (was halfdecade)
,
08/03/2002 17:28, Justin Parke
Re: Nuclear waste; was Yucca Mtn ...
,
08/03/2002 18:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tracing things back (was halfdecade)
,
08/03/2002 19:30, Hugh Haskell
Re: Nuclear waste; was Yucca Mtn ...
,
08/04/2002 00:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: halfdecade
,
08/04/2002 02:48, Larry Cartwright
Re: halfdecade
,
08/04/2002 06:18, Promod Pratap
Re: halfdecade
,
08/04/2002 09:03, chuck britton
Re: The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/04/2002 09:09, chuck britton
Re: Nuclear waste; was Yucca Mtn ...
,
08/04/2002 09:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Greetings to You All In Boise
,
08/04/2002 11:10, William Beaty
Re: halfdecade
,
08/04/2002 11:33, David Bowman
Microwave Detector -Demo-Lab?
,
08/04/2002 11:52, Tony Wayne
Re: Microwave Detector -Demo-Lab?
,
08/04/2002 13:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Microwave Detector -Demo-Lab?
,
08/04/2002 13:04, Owen
Re: Greetings to You All In Boise
,
08/04/2002 14:15, Thomas McCarthy
Re: Big money in the electrostatics biz
,
08/04/2002 15:51, James Mackey
Re: Big money in the electrostatics biz
,
08/04/2002 16:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/04/2002 19:33, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: halfdecade
,
08/04/2002 20:20, Jim Green
Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/04/2002 21:30, Jim Green
Free Enterprise (was: Big money...)
,
08/04/2002 22:17, Brian Whatcott
What Physicists Don't Know (was the Zapno...)
,
08/04/2002 22:47, Brian Whatcott
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 00:30, Brian Whatcott
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 00:34, Brian Whatcott
Re: Yucca Mtn transport issues
,
08/05/2002 09:09, Tina Fanetti
Alternative energy sources
,
08/05/2002 09:17, Tina Fanetti
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/05/2002 11:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 14:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Psychology & Education ( was: the Zapno (tm) anti-static deviceand dishonesty)
,
08/05/2002 14:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 15:47, Jim Green
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 15:54, Larry Smith
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 16:00, Rick Swanson
not completely off topic was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 17:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/05/2002 17:33, Jim Green
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/05/2002 18:49, Hugh Haskell
nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/05/2002 21:02, John S. Denker
Re: not completely off topic was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/06/2002 01:21, Jim Green
Re: Microwave Detector -Demo-Lab?
,
08/06/2002 02:55, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/06/2002 09:18, Spagna Jr., George
Smoke-ring guns at Boise conference
,
08/06/2002 09:46, William Beaty
First Law (was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles)
,
08/06/2002 10:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/06/2002 10:48, Jerry Lisantti
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/06/2002 11:47, Edmiston, Mike
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/06/2002 11:50, John Clement
del F = 4pi J ... correspondence between Clifford Algebra and vector formulation of electromagnetism
,
08/06/2002 12:44, John S. Denker
nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/06/2002 15:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/06/2002 16:43, Edmiston, Mike
Re: The symbol for index of refraction
,
08/06/2002 19:19, crawford j maccallum
Re: First Law (was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles)
,
08/06/2002 23:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: First Law (was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles)
,
08/06/2002 23:28, Jim Green
Re: First Law (was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles)
,
08/07/2002 00:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 00:47, Chris Horton
Re: nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/07/2002 01:04, Rick Tarara
Re: First Law (was Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles)
,
08/07/2002 08:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 08:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 10:56, chuck britton
Re: nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/07/2002 11:18, Dr. Paul O. Johnson
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 11:30, Jim Green
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/07/2002 11:33, John S. Denker
Re: nuclear power
,
08/07/2002 11:42, John S. Denker
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 12:09, Chris Horton
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 12:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/07/2002 15:20, Chris Horton
Re: nuclear power
,
08/07/2002 15:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/07/2002 15:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: nuclear power
,
08/07/2002 15:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: nuclear power
,
08/07/2002 17:44, Larry Woolf
Re: nuclear power
,
08/07/2002 19:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: nuclear power
,
08/07/2002 23:01, paul o johnson
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/07/2002 23:36, Rick Tarara
Re: nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/07/2002 23:44, Rick Tarara
Re: del F = 4pi J ... correspondence between Clifford Algebra and vector formulation of electromagnetism
,
08/08/2002 02:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: del F = 4pi J ... correspondence between Clifford Algebra and vector formulation of electromagnetism
,
08/08/2002 02:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: help stamp out cross products
,
08/08/2002 12:10, John S. Denker
renewable energy (was: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?)
,
08/08/2002 14:05, John S. Denker
palm pilots in physics?
,
08/08/2002 15:21, Carter, Tom
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/08/2002 15:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/08/2002 16:06, Larry Woolf
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/08/2002 16:53, Uri Ganiel
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/08/2002 17:25, Larry Woolf
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/08/2002 18:00, Tony Wayne
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/08/2002 19:40, Sheron Snyder
Re: palm pilots in physics education?
,
08/08/2002 20:09, Carter, Tom
Re: nuclear power, titles of topics:
,
08/08/2002 20:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: nuclear power
,
08/08/2002 20:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: palm pilots in physics education?
,
08/08/2002 21:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: palm pilots in physics education?
,
08/08/2002 23:07, John Clement
MC questions
,
08/09/2002 08:41, John Barrer
Re: Free Enterprise
,
08/09/2002 09:10, Bill Thorp
Re: MC questions
,
08/09/2002 10:31, Carter, Tom
Re: palm pilots in physics education?
,
08/09/2002 10:46, Sheron Snyder
Re: MC questions
,
08/09/2002 11:04, Tina Fanetti
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/09/2002 11:05, Jim Green
Re: MC questions
,
08/09/2002 11:26, John Barrer
Re: MC questions
,
08/09/2002 11:34, Tina Fanetti
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/09/2002 11:48, Sam Sampere
Re: palm pilots in physics education?
,
08/09/2002 13:40, Ivan Rouse
Re: Free Enterprise
,
08/09/2002 17:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/09/2002 17:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: renewable energy (was: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?)
,
08/09/2002 22:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Free Enterprise
,
08/10/2002 00:42, William Beaty
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/10/2002 01:12, Leigh Palmer
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/10/2002 07:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: renewable energy
,
08/10/2002 08:58, John S. Denker
Re: renewable energy
,
08/10/2002 10:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/10/2002 12:42, John S. Denker
Re: Challenging the laws (brief)
,
08/10/2002 13:26, Chris Horton
Re: renewable energy
,
08/10/2002 13:32, Jim Green
Re: renewable energy
,
08/10/2002 17:09, chuck britton
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/10/2002 21:48, Jack Uretsky
List of nuclear topics
,
08/11/2002 07:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 11:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 11:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: List of energy-supply topics
,
08/11/2002 12:42, John S. Denker
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/11/2002 12:42, Leigh Palmer
In defense of the cross-product
,
08/11/2002 14:54, Jack Uretsky
Re: List of energy-supply topics
,
08/11/2002 15:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/11/2002 15:36, John S. Denker
Nuclear renaissance?
,
08/11/2002 15:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 17:01, Hugh Haskell
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 17:20, chuck britton
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 17:21, Michael N. Monce
meteors
,
08/11/2002 17:36, John S. Denker
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 17:46, Hugh Haskell
Re: meteors
,
08/11/2002 18:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: meteors
,
08/11/2002 20:13, John S. Denker
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 21:13, Jim Green
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/11/2002 21:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 22:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: renewable energy
,
08/11/2002 23:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/11/2002 23:22, John S. Denker
Found it! Feasibility of Coal-driven power stations
,
08/11/2002 23:56, Frohne, Vickie
climate change
,
08/12/2002 01:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: In defense of the cross-product
,
08/12/2002 01:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: renewable energy
,
08/12/2002 02:03, Bernard Cleyet
Yucca Mtn. Feedback
,
08/12/2002 03:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: palm pilots in physics?
,
08/12/2002 08:18, Aaron Titus
Re: Yucca Mtn. Feedback
,
08/12/2002 09:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: climate change
,
08/12/2002 10:42, Chris Horton
Re: climate change
,
08/12/2002 11:24, Jim Green
Re: Yucca Mtn. Feedback
,
08/12/2002 12:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: radionuclide experiments on humans
,
08/12/2002 12:13, John S. Denker
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/12/2002 14:36, Jack Uretsky
Re: radionuclide experiments on humans
,
08/12/2002 15:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/12/2002 16:43, John S. Denker
Re: climate change
,
08/12/2002 17:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Yucca Mtn. This should raise some hackles
,
08/13/2002 16:17, Frohne, Vickie
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/13/2002 17:05, Frohne, Vickie
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/13/2002 19:44, Jim Green
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/13/2002 21:16, Aaron Titus
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/13/2002 21:56, Jack Uretsky
electron circles
,
08/13/2002 22:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/14/2002 03:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/14/2002 07:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/14/2002 11:33, Larry Woolf
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/14/2002 11:51, John S. Denker
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/14/2002 12:46, Frohne, Vickie
Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
,
08/14/2002 12:52, Frohne, Vickie
DPGraph
,
08/14/2002 21:19, Michael Bowen
Re: Challenging the laws of physics
,
08/14/2002 23:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: cross-product versus Clifford Algebra
,
08/15/2002 01:50, Jack Uretsky
Re: electron circles, or not
,
08/15/2002 03:29, John S. Denker
Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/15/2002 08:28, Chuck Britton
Al Bartlett's Talk on Videotape
,
08/15/2002 10:04, Warren Hein
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/15/2002 12:35, Larry Woolf
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/15/2002 12:54, Frohne, Vickie
An poll about "the four letter word"
,
08/15/2002 13:01, James McLean
Re: An poll about "the four letter word"
,
08/15/2002 13:29, John S. Denker
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/15/2002 16:56, Chuck Britton
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/15/2002 17:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: An poll about "the four letter word"
,
08/15/2002 18:55, Jim Green
Re: renewable energy
,
08/15/2002 23:54, Brian Whatcott
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/16/2002 00:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/16/2002 00:57, Bernard Cleyet
Nuclear reactors
,
08/16/2002 07:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Nuclear reactors
,
08/16/2002 11:00, Larry Woolf
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/16/2002 11:09, Bob LaMontagne
Re: meteors
,
08/16/2002 12:34, S M Ryan
Re: Testing/fixing Climate Change
,
08/16/2002 13:21, Bernard Cleyet
"Roadmap" to mechanics
,
08/16/2002 13:26, Tim Folkerts
Re: "Roadmap" to mechanics
,
08/16/2002 14:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "Roadmap" to mechanics
,
08/16/2002 14:54, Chris Horton
Fwd: Re: "Roadmap" and off-topic chat
,
08/16/2002 15:10, Chris Horton
Re: "Roadmap" to mechanics
,
08/16/2002 15:30, Mason, Bruce A
Source of quotation?
,
08/16/2002 18:06, Shapiro, Mark
Asteroid
,
08/16/2002 18:08, quantum theory
Energy & Etc.
,
08/16/2002 18:14, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Source of quotation?
,
08/16/2002 18:49, Brian Whatcott
Re: Source of quotation?
,
08/16/2002 19:13, William Beaty
Re: Source of quotation?
,
08/16/2002 19:17, William Beaty
Mystery Equipment
,
08/17/2002 11:55, S M Ryan
Re: Energy & Etc.
,
08/17/2002 12:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Mystery Equipment
,
08/17/2002 12:55, Michael Edmiston
Re: Mystery Equipment
,
08/17/2002 13:45, Ed Schweber
Re: Nuclear reactors
,
08/17/2002 17:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Mystery Equipment
,
08/17/2002 22:48, Thomas B. Greenslade, Jr.
Re: del F = 4pi J ... correspondence between Clifford Algebra and vectorformulation of electromagnetism
,
08/19/2002 02:59, John S. Denker
Re: Source of quotation?
,
08/19/2002 09:41, Jerry Lisantti
Huge graphite chunks
,
08/19/2002 11:17, William Beaty
physics for life science majors
,
08/19/2002 12:29, David Donnelly
How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 14:46, Tina Fanetti
In-class Examples
,
08/19/2002 14:50, Tina Fanetti
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 16:29, Hugh Haskell
Re: In-class Examples
,
08/19/2002 16:36, Hugh Haskell
Re: In-class Examples
,
08/19/2002 17:03, Tim O'Donnell
regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/19/2002 17:04, Joe Heafner
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 17:05, Tim O'Donnell
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/19/2002 17:37, Aaron Titus
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 17:40, John S. Denker
Fwd: AAPT Update 2002 Number 8
,
08/19/2002 17:42, macisaac
Re: regression for mac
,
08/19/2002 17:46, John S. Denker
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 18:41, STRatliff
Re: del F = 4pi J ... correspondence between Clifford Algebra and vectorformulation of electromagnetism
,
08/19/2002 18:42, Larry Smith
NOT CIRCLES! DRIFT! was (Re: electron circles, or not)
,
08/19/2002 19:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: del F = 4pi J ... correspondence between Clifford Algebra and vectorformulation of electromagnetism
,
08/19/2002 19:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: NOT CIRCLES! DRIFT! was (Re: electron circles, or not)
,
08/19/2002 19:40, Bob LaMontagne
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/19/2002 19:52, Hugh Haskell
Re: .djvu and .ps and .pdf
,
08/19/2002 20:12, John S. Denker
Re: In-class Examples
,
08/19/2002 21:50, John Clement
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 23:18, Tina Fanetti
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/19/2002 23:45, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: regression for mac
,
08/20/2002 08:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: In-class Examples
,
08/20/2002 09:10, Tina Fanetti
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/20/2002 09:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/20/2002 09:18, Tina Fanetti
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/20/2002 12:23, John S. Denker
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/20/2002 13:50, Tina Fanetti
Re: regression for mac
,
08/20/2002 14:31, Chuck Britton
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/20/2002 14:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/20/2002 15:02, Ludwik Kowalski
Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 15:05, Brian Blais
Re: regression for mac
,
08/20/2002 15:08, Joe Heafner
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 15:09, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 15:13, Daniel Schroeder2
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 15:49, John S. Denker
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/20/2002 16:30, Larry Smith
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 16:30, paul o johnson
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/20/2002 16:47, John S. Denker
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 16:49, William Beaty
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 16:54, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 17:02, Rick Tarara
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/20/2002 17:05, Tina Fanetti
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 17:08, Wolfgang Rueckner
shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/20/2002 17:57, frank cange
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/20/2002 17:59, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear reactors
,
08/20/2002 18:01, Larry Woolf
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/20/2002 18:17, Joseph Bellina
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 18:49, Brian Whatcott
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 20:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 21:04, Brian Whatcott
Re: Nuclear reactors
,
08/20/2002 21:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/20/2002 22:43, Edmiston, Mike
Re: shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/20/2002 23:29, SSHS KPHOX
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/20/2002 23:39, Chris Horton
Re: In-class Examples
,
08/21/2002 00:25, John Clement
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/21/2002 01:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Trying to keep cool
,
08/21/2002 02:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 04:28, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 07:52, John S. Denker
A radiochemical anecdote
,
08/21/2002 10:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/21/2002 10:22, Brian Whatcott
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 10:28, Brian Whatcott
Xmas tree globe pin wheel
,
08/21/2002 11:28, Chuck Britton
Re: Xmas tree globe pin wheel
,
08/21/2002 12:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 12:41, Chris Horton
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 12:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 13:20, John S. Denker
Re: Xmas tree globe pin wheel
,
08/21/2002 13:30, Chuck Britton
Re: Xmas tree globe pin wheel
,
08/21/2002 13:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/21/2002 14:05, Gordon Johnson
thermo +- geometry, OTBE
,
08/21/2002 15:17, John S. Denker
Re: A radiochemical anecdote
,
08/21/2002 16:16, Mark Sylvester
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 17:32, Joseph Bellina
Re: A radiochemical anecdote
,
08/21/2002 17:41, Rick Swanson
Re: shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/21/2002 18:22, frank cange
Re: The college lecture may be fading
,
08/21/2002 18:34, Richard Hake
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/21/2002 18:34, John S. Denker
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/21/2002 18:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: An poll about "the four letter word"
,
08/21/2002 19:24, Leigh Palmer
Graphical Analysis
,
08/21/2002 21:13, B. Esser
Re: regression in AppleWorks 6.2.4?
,
08/21/2002 22:35, Hugh Haskell
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/22/2002 09:23, Tim Folkerts
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/22/2002 10:42, Robert Cohen
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/22/2002 11:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: joule-thompson expansion
,
08/22/2002 11:49, John S. Denker
Re: multi-step reasoning and Joule-Thompson
,
08/22/2002 13:10, Joseph Bellina
Re: multi-step reasoning and Joule-Thompson
,
08/22/2002 13:39, Hugh Haskell
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/22/2002 13:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: multi-step reasoning and Joule-Thompson
,
08/22/2002 13:50, John S. Denker
Re: multi-step reasoning
,
08/22/2002 14:30, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Xmas tree globe pin wheel
,
08/22/2002 14:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: joule-thompson expansion
,
08/22/2002 15:46, Robert Cohen
Re: NOT CIRCLES! DRIFT! was (Re: electron circles, or not)
,
08/22/2002 20:55, Jack Uretsky
Re: How much is too much?
,
08/22/2002 20:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: multi-step reasoning and Joule-Thompson
,
08/22/2002 21:22, cliff parker
Re: multi-step reasoning and Joule-Thompson
,
08/22/2002 22:20, Hugh Haskell
Re: NOT CIRCLES! DRIFT! was (Re: electron circles, or not)
,
08/22/2002 23:50, Bob LaMontagne
NASA's "avkids" aerodynamics textbook online
,
08/23/2002 00:20, William Beaty
Re: high vacuum -> prize topics
,
08/23/2002 00:20, John S. Denker
college environmental physics course?
,
08/23/2002 10:12, Carter, Tom
possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 11:15, Mike Smith
Re: college environmental physics course?
,
08/23/2002 13:03, Bernard Cleyet
Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 15:13, macisaac
New Physics and Astronomy Faculty Workshop
,
08/23/2002 15:28, Warren Hein
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 15:43, Carter, Tom
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 16:45, William Beaty
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 16:48, William Beaty
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 18:04, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 20:13, Wes Davis
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 20:15, John Clement
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 20:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 21:36, Hugh Haskell
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 21:37, William Beaty
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 22:12, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/23/2002 22:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 23:22, cliff parker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/23/2002 23:56, Joe Heafner
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 00:30, Jim Green
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 00:53, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 01:03, cliff parker
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/24/2002 01:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 01:22, Tucker Hiatt
Re: Particle & Nuclear Physics for HS Teachers
,
08/24/2002 01:31, Tucker Hiatt
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 01:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 01:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 01:45, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 01:53, John Clement
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 02:09, John Clement
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 02:39, John Clement
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 03:33, cliff parker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 08:30, Hugh Haskell
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 08:51, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 08:54, Hugh Haskell
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 08:59, Hugh Haskell
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 09:01, Hugh Haskell
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 09:22, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 09:33, John S. Denker
Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 10:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 10:56, Joe Heafner
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 11:15, John S. Denker
Evidence versus Authorities
,
08/24/2002 11:19, Michael Edmiston
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 11:21, James Mackey
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 11:32, James Mackey
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 11:39, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 12:27, Robert Cohen
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 12:47, John Clement
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 12:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 13:14, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 13:16, Joseph Bellina
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 13:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Evidence versus Authorities
,
08/24/2002 13:21, Hugh Haskell
Re: Evidence versus Authorities
,
08/24/2002 13:25, Joseph Bellina
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 13:35, Hugh Haskell
"Theories become Laws" misconception
,
08/24/2002 14:24, William Beaty
Funny Parsing of E-mail Lines
,
08/24/2002 14:26, Michael Edmiston
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 14:42, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 14:54, William Beaty
Re: "Theories become Laws" misconception
,
08/24/2002 14:55, John Clement
Re: Funny Parsing of E-mail Lines
,
08/24/2002 15:02, John S. Denker
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/24/2002 17:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 17:42, Gary Turner
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 18:29, Hugh Haskell
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 19:31, Jack Uretsky
dominos on a chessboard (was Re: multi-step reasoning)
,
08/24/2002 19:46, Jack Uretsky
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 19:49, Chuck Britton
Re: Evidence versus Authorities
,
08/24/2002 20:01, Jack Uretsky
Re: dominos on a chessboard (was Re: multi-step reasoning)
,
08/24/2002 20:10, Chuck Britton
Re: Radioactive decay, evidence versus authorities
,
08/24/2002 20:26, John S. Denker
Re: Funny Parsing of E-mail Lines
,
08/24/2002 20:45, Michael Edmiston
Re: dominos on a chessboard (was Re: multi-step reasoning)
,
08/24/2002 20:48, John S. Denker
Re: Funny Parsing of E-mail Lines
,
08/24/2002 20:50, John S. Denker
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/24/2002 20:59, Larry Woolf
Re: Mystery Equipment
,
08/24/2002 22:13, S M Ryan
Beichner's book
,
08/25/2002 06:17, Robert J. Beichner
creationism wars
,
08/25/2002 07:42, John Barrer
Re: examples vs. formalism -- chapter 0 versus appendix
,
08/25/2002 09:42, John S. Denker
Re: vector products
,
08/25/2002 09:46, John S. Denker
Book ideas
,
08/25/2002 15:31, Robert J. Beichner
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/25/2002 16:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Beichner's book
,
08/25/2002 21:23, Joe Heafner
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/25/2002 21:52, Bernard Cleyet
No Kinematics
,
08/25/2002 22:44, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Beichner's book
,
08/25/2002 23:27, John Clement
lightning bolts in acrylic block
,
08/26/2002 03:06, William Beaty
Textbook discussion website
,
08/26/2002 05:17, Robert J. Beichner
Re: lightning bolts in acrylic block
,
08/26/2002 07:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 08:08, John S. Denker
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 08:58, Joe Heafner
Re: No Kinematics
,
08/26/2002 09:09, Joe Heafner
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/26/2002 09:13, James Mackey
Re: Beichner's book
,
08/26/2002 09:23, Joseph Bellina
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/26/2002 09:31, Joseph Bellina
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 09:34, James Mackey
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/26/2002 09:40, Carter, Tom
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 10:46, John S. Denker
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/26/2002 11:05, Frohne, Vickie
Re: Radioactive decay
,
08/26/2002 11:09, Robert Cohen
Re: Beichner's book
,
08/26/2002 11:22, Robert Cohen
Re: dominos on a chessboard (was Re: multi-step reasoning)
,
08/26/2002 12:00, Jack Uretsky
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 12:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 12:28, John Barrer
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 12:45, John Cockman
Re: vector products
,
08/26/2002 12:48, Tina Fanetti
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 12:57, Rick Tarara
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 13:05, Hugh Haskell
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 14:17, Tim Folkerts
another textbook shortage
,
08/26/2002 14:24, Justin Parke
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 14:52, John S. Denker
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 15:02, James Mackey
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 15:19, James Mackey
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 15:24, James Mackey
3rd Annual Conference on Case Study Teaching in Science
,
08/26/2002 15:36, Nancy A Schiller
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 15:59, Robert Cohen
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 16:18, Tim Folkerts
Pencils (was Radioactive decay)
,
08/26/2002 16:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 16:47, Daniel S. Price
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 16:59, Shapiro, Mark
Re: creationism wars
,
08/26/2002 17:07, John Barrer
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 17:08, Joe Heafner
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 17:13, John S. Denker
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 17:13, Joe Heafner
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 17:25, Tim Folkerts
Re: vector products
,
08/26/2002 17:34, John S. Denker
Tenure-Track Position in Physics
,
08/26/2002 17:43, Shapiro, Mark
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 17:47, Robert Cohen
Re: Tenure-Track Position in Physics
,
08/26/2002 17:54, Shapiro, Mark
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 18:30, Bob LaMontagne
Re: vector products
,
08/26/2002 18:43, Larry Smith
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/26/2002 19:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: vector products
,
08/26/2002 20:29, John S. Denker
Re: vector products
,
08/26/2002 22:12, Joe Heafner
Re: shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/27/2002 00:53, frank cange
Re: another textbook shortage
,
08/27/2002 09:11, Tina Fanetti
Re: vector products
,
08/27/2002 09:13, Tina Fanetti
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/27/2002 10:14, Robert Cohen
left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 12:37, John S. Denker
Voices from Phys-L
,
08/27/2002 13:01, Ludwik Kowalski
astronomy group activity
,
08/27/2002 13:08, Joe Heafner
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 13:16, Robert Cohen
Re: shortage of textbooks, requesting help!
,
08/27/2002 13:18, Gordon Johnson
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 13:42, John S. Denker
Re: Radioactive decay (pennies and nickles)
,
08/27/2002 13:44, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 15:13, Robert Cohen
Clifford Algebra References
,
08/27/2002 15:38, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Radioactive decay (pennies and nickles)
,
08/27/2002 16:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: dominos on a chessboard-advanced version (was Re: multi-step reasoning)
,
08/27/2002 16:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: Radioactive decay (pennies and nickles)
,
08/27/2002 16:33, Lehman, Cherie
Re: vector products
,
08/27/2002 16:55, Jack Uretsky
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/27/2002 17:05, Jack Uretsky
For Justin text book needed
,
08/27/2002 17:47, SSHS KPHOX
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/27/2002 17:51, Larry Woolf
Re: possibly OT: NYT article on GA creationism/evolution debate
,
08/27/2002 17:54, Shapiro, Mark
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 17:59, John S. Denker
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/27/2002 19:02, Tina Fanetti
Re: Book ideas
,
08/27/2002 19:08, Jack Uretsky
Re: Beichner's book
,
08/27/2002 19:18, Larry Smith
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/27/2002 21:14, John Clement
AN HTML BUG?
,
08/27/2002 21:38, Ludwik Kowalski
AN HTML BUG?
,
08/27/2002 21:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 22:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/27/2002 22:06, John S. Denker
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/27/2002 22:13, John S. Denker
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 01:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/28/2002 07:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/28/2002 08:50, John S. Denker
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/28/2002 09:06, John S. Denker
Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/28/2002 09:32, Joseph Bellina
kinematics language -- Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/28/2002 09:49, Aaron Titus
Re: kinematics language -- Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/28/2002 10:05, Joseph Bellina
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/28/2002 10:07, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 10:30, Robert Cohen
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 10:39, John S. Denker
Two culture crossover
,
08/28/2002 10:49, Sandin
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 10:53, John S. Denker
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 11:17, Robert Cohen
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 11:40, Aaron Titus
Looking for free software
,
08/28/2002 11:48, Roberto Carabajal
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 11:59, Daniel S. Price
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 12:05, Joseph Bellina
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 12:22, Hugh Haskell
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 12:24, Rick Tarara
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 12:29, John S. Denker
Re: Looking for free software
,
08/28/2002 13:01, Aaron Titus
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 13:09, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Looking for free software
,
08/28/2002 15:11, Brian Whatcott
Re: Looking for free software
,
08/28/2002 15:48, Roberto Carabajal
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 16:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: kinematics language -- Re: kinematics, traditional or not
,
08/28/2002 16:48, paul o johnson
Re: Looking for free software
,
08/28/2002 17:16, Brian Whatcott
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 18:56, John S. Denker
kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 20:23, brian mcinnes
AAPT winter meeting - Physlets
,
08/28/2002 20:33, Aaron Titus
Re: AAPT winter meeting - Physlets
,
08/28/2002 21:31, Aaron Titus
Re: kinematics language
,
08/28/2002 22:19, Joe Heafner
Re: creationism wars
,
08/28/2002 22:34, James Mackey
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/28/2002 22:49, James Mackey
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/28/2002 23:17, Jack Uretsky
Re: creationism wars
,
08/28/2002 23:24, Hugh Haskell
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 00:02, Brian Whatcott
Re: AAPT winter meeting - Physlets
,
08/29/2002 00:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 01:11, John S. Denker
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 02:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 02:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 07:10, John S. Denker
Versions of FCI
,
08/29/2002 09:35, Tim Folkerts
Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 09:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 10:12, Robert Cohen
Re: creationism wars
,
08/29/2002 10:15, James Mackey
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 10:32, John S. Denker
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 10:38, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 10:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: creationism wars
,
08/29/2002 11:10, Vern Lindberg
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 11:13, Robert Cohen
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 11:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: AN HTML BUG?
,
08/29/2002 11:44, Joe Heafner
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 11:58, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 12:07, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 12:15, Larry Woolf
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 12:21, John S. Denker
E^2 - p^2 = m^2
,
08/29/2002 12:50, John S. Denker
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 12:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 13:06, Larry Smith
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 13:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 13:43, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 13:57, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 14:02, Rick Tarara
Re: creationism wars
,
08/29/2002 15:44, Larry Woolf
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 16:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 16:40, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/29/2002 16:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 20:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: left/right symmetry, manifest or not
,
08/29/2002 20:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: Found it! Feasibility of Coal-driven power stations
,
08/29/2002 22:55, paul o johnson
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/30/2002 10:38, Ludwik Kowalski
CYNMAR CORPORATION
,
08/30/2002 12:25, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/30/2002 12:58, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/30/2002 14:53, John S. Denker
Re: Nuclear topics in physics?
,
08/30/2002 14:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: barrier penetration, evanescent waves
,
08/30/2002 15:27, John S. Denker
Re: barrier penetration, evanescent waves
,
08/30/2002 17:37, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: nuclear reaction coordinates
,
08/30/2002 18:48, John S. Denker
test
,
08/30/2002 20:02, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
magnitude of parallelograms and parallelepipeds
,
08/31/2002 12:17, John S. Denker
Report on the Swedish SAT
,
08/31/2002 15:24, Richard Hake
Electronic Textbooks Giancoli
,
08/31/2002 15:43, Scott Goelzer
Re: magnitude of parallelograms and parallelepipeds
,
08/31/2002 15:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: magnitude of parallelograms and parallelepipeds
,
08/31/2002 16:08, John S. Denker
Re: magnitude of parallelograms and parallelepipeds
,
08/31/2002 17:02, Bob Sciamanda
Re: magnitude of parallelograms and parallelepipeds
,
08/31/2002 17:34, Jack Uretsky
What is a Clifford Algebra
,
08/31/2002 18:17, Jack Uretsky
What is a Clifford Algebra (Corrected)
,
08/31/2002 18:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: magnitude of parallelograms and parallelepipeds
,
08/31/2002 19:34, John S. Denker
Re: The college lecture may be fading
,
08/31/2002 21:13, Richard Hake
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc