Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Proof for atoms?



I think you might discuss two ideas with the student.
1) conservation of mass in chemical changes
2) Avogadroes principle (not number) that equal volumes of gases at the
same temperature and pressure have the same number of particles, and how
it provides such a good understanding for the gas laws.

There are other phenomena that point to non-continuum of matter, but
they are more technical...STM comes to mind. Oh yes, you might also
talk about the Rutherford scattering experiments.

cheers,

joe

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002,
Savinainen Antti wrote:

Hello,

I had an interesting discussion about atoms with a doubter who asked=
if there
is any proof for existence of atoms. The argument was that of course =
physicists
find atoms because the idea of atoms is their very starting point! Th=
e doubter
asked experiments which could provide convincing evidence for the exi=
stence of
atoms without having initially decided that idea of atoms is used to =
analyze
the data.

What would you answer?

In a way I think that the doubter would have been quite right in the =
19th
century. At the time atoms were used as an hypothesis which allowed n=
ice
explanations and predictions in thermal physics.

The question is interesting from the point of view of philosophy of s=
cience.
Einstein said that it is the theory that determines what can be obser=
ved (I
don't have an exact citation here; I read it from an issue of Physics=
Today a
year or two ago). I also recall that Hawking said that there is no ex=
perimental
data on cosmology which would be independent on theory (again this is=
not exact
citation). OTOH it is not easy at all to construct theories which wou=
ld provide
correct predictions even in previously unkonown phenomena. It is very
convincing if a theory is capable of doing that.

I think that these "how do you know" questions could be useful in tea=
ching as
well. It forces students (and me) to think critically. Late Arnod Aro=
ns has
written about this issue in his marvelous "Teaching Introductory Phys=
ics" book.

Regards,

Antti

Antti Savinainen
Physics Teacher
Kuopion Lyseo High School/IB
Finland

Homepage: <http://personal.inet.fi/tiede/physics/>


Joseph J. Bellina, Jr. 219-284-4662
Associate Professor of Physics
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, IN 46556