Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Argument of wavefunction

On 27 Feb 2002, at 7:03, Brian Whatcott wrote:

At 11:52 PM 2/26/02, Sarma wrote:
... This I think is preferable because it allows the student
to understand the phase change of the reflected wave from the
boundary of medium of greater impedance. If we take sin(kx-wt)
this does not come directly.

What are the experiences of the list members regarding this.

regards,

Sarma.


We deny it because it is wrong?



Brian Whatcott
Altus OK Eureka!


I beg your indulgence. Will it be too much to ask
you to be a bit more elaborate?

regards,
Sarma.