Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Confused by a derivation.



Berkeley Physics Course did it, but they only give the result:
The true cap. ....
effect of edge correction ... represented by ...

Q = [A (potential 1 - potential 2)/4Pi*s ] * f where f is ratio of
separation (s) to radius of disks (R)


s/R and f respectively: 0.2 - 1.286; 0.1 - 1.167; 0.05 - 1.094;
0.02 - 1.042; 0.01 - 1.023

bc

BTW found more recent determination of limits on n=2 Williams,
Faller, and Hill '71

David Bowman wrote:

Regarding John Mallinckrodt's comment:
...
1 that we genuinely do have planar symmetry, i.e., there is no
fringing field (this is the key), and
...
For real capacitors assumption 1 is violated and the result does
not hold although the violation is typically quite minor.

Since last year I was able to find the exact expression for the
capacitance to infinity of a thin circular disc, I thought I
might try my hand at trying to exactly solve for the capacitance
of a pair of parallel oppositely charged circular plates so as to
see explicitly and analytically the effects of the fringing field
as a function of the plate separation. So far I haven't come up
with a solution. But if I do, I post it. Maybe the exact solution
is just too hard; we'll see. So far it's too soon to tell.

David Bowman
David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu