Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: conservation of momentum



Justin,
I just tried a) and b) and got the book's answer.

For b) I broke it into two variants of what I did
for a).

That is momentum is conserved as m1 moves away
from M +m2 at v(rel)

This gives (iceboat + m2) a velocity, V', relative
to the ground, V' = 2/15 v(rel)

Next conserve momentum as m2 moves away from M at
v(rel) and do this in the center of momentum frame
of M & m2.

This yields a velocity of V'' = 1/13 v(rel) for M
relative to the CM of M & m2.

Final velocity of the iceboat relative to the
ground is the velocity, V, of the CM of M & m2
plus the velocity of M relative to this CM. V =
(2/15+1/13) v(rel)


Thanks
Roger Haar

***************************************************************
Justin Parke wrote:

If you will bear with me, I have another question about a homework problem where the book and I disagree. This one is from Halliday, Resnick, and Walker Fundamentals of Physics, 5th edition. p. 211 number 47.

"You are on an iceboat on frictionless, flat ice; you and the boat have a combined mass M. Along with you are two stones of masses m1 and m2 such that M=6m1=12m2. To get the boat moving, you throw the stones rearward, either in succession or together, but in each case with a cetain speed v(rel) relative to the boat. What is the resulting speed of the boat if you throw the stones
a) simultaneously
b) m1 then m2
c) m2 then m1?

book:
a) .2 v(rel) (I agree)
b) .210 v(rel)
c) .209 v(rel)

I don't get b) and c).

Comments?

Justin Parke