Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Banked road



In the static case, all I really had to say was that here the acceleration
is given as zero. Therefore ANY component of the net force must be zero.
N=mgCosA simply applies this to the direction perpendicular to the plane.
Bob Sciamanda
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
trebor@velocity.net
http://www.velocity.net/~trebor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ludwik Kowalski" <kowalskiL@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU>
To: <PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: Banked road


Thanks to all who responded. I was puzzled but
now all is clear. Unfortunately, most authors do
not discuss this "quazi-paradoxical" situation.
Ludwik Kowalski


Bob Sciamanda wrote:

Both cases involve an object accelerating under the influence of two
forces : mg(down) and N(normal to the plane).
These problems are solvable only because it is assumed that the
direction
of the acceleration (and therefore the net force) is known from the
statement of the problem (the ocurring motion is stated-or implied).
The
acceleration is along the plane in one case, and toward the center of
the
circular trajectory in the other case.

The equations you quote for N simply state that the net force (the
resultant of mg and N) must have zero component perpendicular to the
known
direction of the acceleration.

In the static case, a third (frictional) force is involved. Here
although
the acceleration is zero the rigidity of the plane still demands that
the
net force into the plane be zero. The Normal force adjusts to make
this
so (so long as the structure is capable!).

Bob Sciamanda
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (em)
trebor@velocity.net
http://www.velocity.net/~trebor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ludwik Kowalski" <kowalskiL@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU>
To: <PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 11:48 AM
Subject: Banked road

The normal force with which an inclined plane is acting on an
object is N= m*g*cosA, where A is the angle of inclination.
Students use this approach to calculate accelerations (with or
without friction) or to solve equilibrium problems.

But in dealing with banked roads they are suddenly asked to
accept that N=mg/cosA. How can this be explained?
Ludwik Kowalski