Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
[snip]
It is _not_ true that F is defined in terms of ma. F=ma is
_not_ an axiom nor
a tautology. To say it in more positive terms: We have an
operational
definition of force. We have an operational definition of
mass. We have
an operational definition of acceleration. In Newtonian
mechanics, the
equality between F and ma is a law, an approximate law, based
on empirical
observations. We can design experiments to test whether F
does equal ma to
some greater or lesser degree of accuracy.
I agree with the above. However, I was once informed by somebody
(two people, actually, who certainly acted as though *I* was the
misguided one) that F=ma is actually a theory, not a law. Is anyone
familiar with this alternate view who can provide the argument for it?