Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of October, 2001
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: What are "elementary particles?"
,
10/01/2001 04:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Weight and Mass
,
10/01/2001 04:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: OXYMORON
,
10/01/2001 10:56, Roger Haar
Re: how science works
,
10/01/2001 11:01, RAUBER, JOEL
Rotation of Protostars and Stellar Disks
,
10/01/2001 14:29, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: Rotation of Protostars and Stellar Disks
,
10/01/2001 15:00, Stephen Murray
Warning: eximcon, S. P. Tuteja
,
10/01/2001 17:16, William Beaty
Physics Definition of Work
,
10/01/2001 17:45, QUIST, OREN
Re: how science works
,
10/01/2001 17:50, William Beaty
Re: Strangeness Minus Three
,
10/01/2001 18:15, Larry Smith
Re: Rotation of Protostars and Stellar Disks
,
10/01/2001 18:58, brian whatcott
Re: Weight and Mass
,
10/01/2001 19:25, brian whatcott
Re: Strangeness Minus Three
,
10/01/2001 19:58, brian whatcott
Re: Strangeness Minus Three
,
10/01/2001 22:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Physics Definition of Work
,
10/01/2001 22:29, Jim Green
teaching loads and quality
,
10/01/2001 23:05, Joe Heafner
Re: Thinking Level of students was: World's noise
,
10/01/2001 23:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 00:30, brian whatcott
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 01:12, John Clement
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 1 Oct 2001 - Special issue (#2001-375)
,
10/02/2001 08:27, kforinas
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 11:25, Jack Uretsky
Re: Strangeness Minus Three
,
10/02/2001 11:35, Robert Fenstermacher
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 12:01, Tina Fanetti
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 12:39, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 13:10, Rick Tarara
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 13:27, Carter, Tom
Re: Physics definition of work
,
10/02/2001 13:35, Pratt, Reyna
Re: Physics definition of work
,
10/02/2001 15:08, Michael Edmiston
Reliability and Validity of FCI
,
10/02/2001 15:15, Michael Lach
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 15:27, Rick Tarara
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/02/2001 16:44, Jack Uretsky
Re: Physics definition of work
,
10/03/2001 08:25, Tony Wayne
Re: Physics definition of work
,
10/03/2001 09:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/03/2001 11:00, Joe Heafner
Re: Reliability and Validity of FCI
,
10/03/2001 11:32, Savinainen Antti
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/03/2001 11:39, kforinas
Re: Physics Definition of Work -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
,
10/03/2001 11:46, John S. Denker
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/03/2001 11:50, Larry Smith
Re: Physics Definition of Work -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
,
10/03/2001 11:52, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/03/2001 12:19, Michael N. Monce
Nobel Site
,
10/03/2001 12:29, Jim Green
Re: Physics definition of work
,
10/03/2001 13:00, brian whatcott
Re: teaching loads and quality
,
10/03/2001 13:05, Joe Heafner
Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/03/2001 13:46, Harold Hart
work and energy
,
10/03/2001 14:01, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/03/2001 14:02, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/03/2001 14:06, Joe Heafner
RE: Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/03/2001 14:28, Robert W . Arts
Re: Nobel Site
,
10/03/2001 14:31, Larry Cartwright
Re: Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/03/2001 14:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/03/2001 14:59, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: Reliability and Validity of FCI
,
10/03/2001 15:25, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Physics Definition of Work -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
,
10/03/2001 15:33, Jim Green
Re: work and energy
,
10/03/2001 15:42, Jim Green
Re: modern physics texts
,
10/03/2001 16:22, Larry Smith
Re: Physics Definition of Work -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
,
10/03/2001 16:58, kowalskil
Re: work and energy
,
10/03/2001 17:07, Jim Green
Re: work and energy
,
10/03/2001 17:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: work and energy
,
10/03/2001 19:03, kowalskil
Re: Reliability and Validity of FCI
,
10/03/2001 19:18, Jack Uretsky
Off Topic: Gene for Language.
,
10/03/2001 19:36, brian whatcott
Re: Physics definition of work
,
10/04/2001 02:26, Greg Darakjian
Re: Modern Physics Textbook
,
10/04/2001 09:34, Michael Edmiston
Re: Physics definition of work (simple machines)
,
10/04/2001 13:05, Scott Goelzer
tenure-track physics position - DePauw University
,
10/04/2001 13:13, Vic Decarlo
Re: work and energy
,
10/04/2001 17:08, Scot A.C. Gould
Re: Reliability and Validity of FCI
,
10/04/2001 18:03, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Off Topic: Gene for Language.
,
10/04/2001 20:23, Jack Uretsky
Re: work and energy
,
10/05/2001 01:00, John S. Denker
flow, conservation, and continuity of world-lines
,
10/05/2001 08:22, John S. Denker
Magnetic Field Intensity?
,
10/05/2001 11:36, Corey Graham
Re: Magnetic Field Intensity?
,
10/05/2001 11:51, John S. Denker
Denker's Thermodynamics essay
,
10/05/2001 17:00, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/05/2001 18:50, John S. Denker
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/05/2001 19:11, John S. Denker
Narges instead of charges?
,
10/05/2001 19:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/05/2001 19:28, Larry Smith
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/05/2001 19:35, John S. Denker
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/05/2001 19:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/05/2001 22:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Sunday Morning Puzzle.
,
10/06/2001 01:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/06/2001 03:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle (was: Sunday Morning Puzzle.)
,
10/06/2001 03:12, Michael Bowen
Work and Energy and Thermo
,
10/06/2001 06:32, Jim Green
Re: Sunday Morning Puzzle.
,
10/06/2001 07:07, brian whatcott
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 07:32, brian whatcott
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/06/2001 09:15, Chuck Britton
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 09:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/06/2001 10:07, Ludwik Kowalski
[no subject]
,
10/06/2001 10:18, Steven D. Richardson
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 11:21, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 11:47, John S. Denker
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 12:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 12:44, John S. Denker
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 13:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 13:32, John S. Denker
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 14:14, John S. Denker
Re: Sunday Morning Puzzle.
,
10/06/2001 14:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 14:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 14:23, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/06/2001 14:25, Bob Sciamanda
collected works
,
10/06/2001 14:55, John S. Denker
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle (was: Sunday Morning Puzzle.)
,
10/06/2001 14:55, Bernard Cleyet
HOLES AS CARRIERS (was Narges instead of charges?)
,
10/06/2001 16:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/06/2001 17:12, William Beaty
Re: Narges instead of charges?
,
10/06/2001 18:14, John Clement
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS (was Narges instead of charges?)
,
10/06/2001 18:25, William Beaty
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS (was Narges instead of charges?)
,
10/06/2001 19:00, Tim Folkerts
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS (was Narges instead of charges?)
,
10/06/2001 19:33, William Beaty
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS (was Narges instead of charges?)
,
10/06/2001 20:58, Ludwik Kowalski
"electric current" is not electron flow
,
10/06/2001 21:58, William Beaty
Re: Book of Phyz
,
10/06/2001 22:07, Keith C. Tipton
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS (was Narges instead of charges?)
,
10/06/2001 22:08, William Beaty
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/06/2001 22:38, brian whatcott
Re: "electric current" is not electron flow
,
10/07/2001 00:13, John Clement
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/07/2001 01:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/07/2001 06:05, John S. Denker
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/07/2001 10:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/07/2001 11:42, John Clement
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/07/2001 13:10, John S. Denker
Re: "electric current" is not electron flow
,
10/07/2001 14:24, William Beaty
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/07/2001 15:27, brian whatcott
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/07/2001 15:50, William Beaty
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/07/2001 16:09, John Mallinckrodt
Re: The "Book of Phyz"
,
10/07/2001 18:33, Larry Cartwright
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Part 2
,
10/07/2001 21:54, brian whatcott
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/08/2001 12:16, Michael Edmiston
Request for your replies: AP Exam
,
10/08/2001 12:33, Eric Smith
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/08/2001 13:19, John S. Denker
Why..
,
10/08/2001 13:37, Tina Fanetti
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/08/2001 13:37, brian whatcott
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/08/2001 13:45, Larry Woolf
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 13:52, David Bowman
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 13:57, Rick Tarara
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 14:19, Joe Heafner
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 14:46, John S. Denker
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 15:03, Cooper John N
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 15:54, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Why?
,
10/08/2001 15:59, Spagna Jr., George
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/08/2001 16:03, Michael Edmiston
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 16:07, Larry Cartwright
Re: Why?
,
10/08/2001 16:34, Michael Edmiston
Re: Why?
,
10/08/2001 16:38, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Why?
,
10/08/2001 16:38, Rick Tarara
Narge
,
10/08/2001 16:42, Stuart Leinoff
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 16:53, Joe Heafner
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 17:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 17:52, Kossom
Re: Request for your replies: AP Exam
,
10/08/2001 18:27, Vern Dewees
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS
,
10/08/2001 19:10, John S. Denker
Re: Request for your replies: AP Exam
,
10/08/2001 19:42, Richard Hake
Re: Why..
,
10/08/2001 21:40, Derek and Phillipa Chirnside
Displacement
,
10/08/2001 22:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Why "Why" for a Subject Heading?
,
10/08/2001 23:55, Richard Hake
Re: Why "Why" for a Subject Heading?
,
10/09/2001 00:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Displacement
,
10/09/2001 00:32, Greg Darakjian
Re: Why.. students can't read directions
,
10/09/2001 01:37, John Clement
Re: Why.. students can't read directions
,
10/09/2001 05:53, Cooper John N
Re: Why human beings skim instructions
,
10/09/2001 07:36, John S. Denker
Re: Displacement
,
10/09/2001 08:27, Pete Lohstreter
Re: Why..
,
10/09/2001 08:44, Tom Walkiewicz
Re: Displacement
,
10/09/2001 08:51, Gene Mosca
Re: Displacement
,
10/09/2001 08:56, John S. Denker
Re: Why human beings skim instructions
,
10/09/2001 09:32, Robert Cohen
Re: Displacement
,
10/09/2001 10:09, Joseph Bellina
displacement and graphs
,
10/09/2001 11:19, SSHS KPHOX
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/09/2001 11:23, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Why.. students can't read directions
,
10/09/2001 12:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/09/2001 12:22, Larry Smith
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/09/2001 13:07, John S. Denker
Where Is Alan Cairns's SciEd Site?
,
10/09/2001 13:11, Richard Hake
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/09/2001 14:25, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/09/2001 14:36, RAUBER, JOEL
Why Can't Students Read and Follow Directions? (Was "Why..") FORWARD from Donald Slavin.
,
10/09/2001 14:59, Richard Hake
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/09/2001 17:24, SSHS KPHOX
Location of Alan Cairns's SciEd Site
,
10/09/2001 17:55, Richard Hake
Re: Why Can't Students Read and Follow Directions? (Was "Why..") FORWARD from Donald Slavin.
,
10/09/2001 18:57, brian whatcott
Re: Why Can't Students Read and Follow Directions? (Was "Why..") FORWARD from Donald Slavin.
,
10/09/2001 20:15, John Mallinckrodt
ANONOTHER ASPECT (was "why")
,
10/09/2001 22:02, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ANONOTHER ASPECT (was "why")
,
10/09/2001 22:05, Tina Fanetti
ANOTHER ASPECT (was "why")
,
10/09/2001 22:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 04:58, Spagna Jr., George
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 07:38, John S. Denker
Re: software: no wrong options?
,
10/10/2001 08:22, John S. Denker
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 08:45, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ANOTHER ASPECT (was "why")
,
10/10/2001 09:00, Joseph Bellina
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:05, John S. Denker
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:07, Rick Tarara
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:10, Joseph Bellina
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:36, John S. Denker
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:36, Rick Tarara
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ANOTHER ASPECT (was "why")
,
10/10/2001 09:54, Michael Edmiston
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 09:59, Rick Tarara
HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 10:15, Chuck Britton
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 10:25, John S. Denker
Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 10:42, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Location of Alan Cairns's SciEd Site
,
10/10/2001 10:45, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 11:05, John S. Denker
Size of Universe
,
10/10/2001 11:06, Wes Davis
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 12:07, Clarence Bennett
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 12:35, Robert Cohen
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 12:57, Chuck Britton
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 13:15, Bob Sciamanda
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 13:26, Chuck Britton
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 13:30, Rick Tarara
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 13:38, Bob Sciamanda
Re: displacement and graphs
,
10/10/2001 13:40, John S. Denker
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 14:02, John S. Denker
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 14:23, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 14:33, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/10/2001 14:55, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/10/2001 14:59, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 15:02, John S. Denker
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 15:11, Robert Cohen
work and energy - take 2
,
10/10/2001 15:14, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/10/2001 15:16, John S. Denker
Re: Size of Universe
,
10/10/2001 15:37, John S. Denker
work and energy - take 2
,
10/10/2001 15:43, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/10/2001 15:54, John S. Denker
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/10/2001 16:14, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Thermodynamics essay
,
10/10/2001 16:50, RAUBER, JOEL
Friction and rolling on a ramp
,
10/10/2001 17:53, SSHS KPHOX
Thermodynamics essay debate (for the record)
,
10/10/2001 18:11, RAUBER, JOEL
Fire escape tubes etc.
,
10/10/2001 18:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 21:00, brian whatcott
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/10/2001 22:05, Chuck Britton
Re: work and energy - take 2
,
10/10/2001 22:34, Jim Green
ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/10/2001 23:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 00:04, Ludwik Kowalski
ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 06:09, Ludwik Kowalski
work, energy, etc
,
10/11/2001 08:23, John Barrer
Re: work, energy, etc
,
10/11/2001 09:12, John S. Denker
Re: Friction and rolling on a ramp
,
10/11/2001 09:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: work, energy, etc
,
10/11/2001 09:40, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 10:27, Joseph Bellina
Re: Displacement and position (was: displacement and graphs)
,
10/11/2001 10:37, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Size of Universe
,
10/11/2001 10:40, David Bowman
Re: Friction and rolling on a ramp
,
10/11/2001 11:29, SSHS KPHOX
Equal Signs
,
10/11/2001 12:40, Jim Green
Re: Equal Signs
,
10/11/2001 13:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 13:36, Hugh Haskell
energy introduced without work
,
10/11/2001 13:40, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 13:55, kowalskil
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 14:14, Carl E. Mungan
Msg. line wrapping, WAS:Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q (was Displacement)
,
10/11/2001 14:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: energy introduced without work
,
10/11/2001 14:57, Jim Green
Re: energy introduced without work
,
10/11/2001 14:59, Joseph Bellina
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/11/2001 16:30, William Beaty
Re: HOLES AS CARRIERS Negative mass?
,
10/11/2001 18:02, Robert Cohen
Re: energy introduced without work
,
10/11/2001 18:31, John S. Denker
Re: energy introduced without work
,
10/11/2001 19:04, Larry Woolf
Re: energy introduced without work
,
10/11/2001 19:48, Joseph Bellina
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/11/2001 23:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: work, energy, etc
,
10/11/2001 23:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: work, energy, etc
,
10/12/2001 01:39, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 01:52, Jim Green
Re: work, energy, etc
,
10/12/2001 03:01, Larry Cartwright
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 08:21, John S. Denker
HISTORY (was: ENERGY BEFORE Q)
,
10/12/2001 08:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: HISTORY (was: ENERGY BEFORE Q)
,
10/12/2001 08:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Fire escape tubes etc. New York Times needs helps in physics.
,
10/12/2001 09:52, Scott Goelzer
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 11:31, Bob Sciamanda
Energy before Work
,
10/12/2001 11:48, RAUBER, JOEL
Fire escape tubes etc. article is online.
,
10/12/2001 12:05, Tony Wayne
Re: HISTORY (was: ENERGY BEFORE Q)
,
10/12/2001 12:40, Jim Green
Why work before energy in texts
,
10/12/2001 12:42, Joseph Bellina
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 12:46, Jim Green
Re: Fire escape tubes etc. article is online.
,
10/12/2001 12:49, Shapiro, Mark
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 16:03, Ludwik Kowalski
"scientific information only" search service
,
10/12/2001 16:12, Larry Cartwright
pvc pipes and projectiles
,
10/12/2001 16:14, Dwight K. Souder
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 16:33, Bob Sciamanda
The concept of potential energy.
,
10/12/2001 17:18, Dario Moreno
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/12/2001 18:15, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/12/2001 18:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: The concept of potential energy.
,
10/12/2001 19:59, Jim Green
Re: The concept of potential energy.
,
10/12/2001 20:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: "scientific information only" search service
,
10/12/2001 20:52, brian whatcott
Re: The concept of potential energy.
,
10/12/2001 20:59, John S. Denker
ENERGY WITH Q, STEP 1.
,
10/12/2001 21:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: pvc pipes and projectiles
,
10/12/2001 21:23, brian whatcott
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Finale
,
10/13/2001 01:04, brian whatcott
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/13/2001 02:13, Jim Green
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/13/2001 06:55, John Clement
Re: The concept of potential energy.
,
10/13/2001 08:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q, STEP 2.
,
10/13/2001 09:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: The concept of potential energy.
,
10/13/2001 11:07, John S. Denker
Re: reality of energy +- mechanism of energy
,
10/13/2001 11:42, John S. Denker
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/13/2001 12:39, Ludwik Kowalski
The concept of potential energy.
,
10/13/2001 13:09, Dario Moreno
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/13/2001 14:32, Jim Green
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/13/2001 14:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Finale
,
10/13/2001 17:32, Bernard Cleyet
host for the wyse contest at st. charles comm. college
,
10/13/2001 19:02, frank cange
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/13/2001 20:51, Chuck Britton
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Finale
,
10/14/2001 01:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 09:09, John S. Denker
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 11:54, Robert Cohen
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 13:32, John S. Denker
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 15:06, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 15:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 17:02, Larry Cartwright
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 17:43, Jim Green
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 19:12, John S. Denker
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/14/2001 23:31, Larry Cartwright
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 00:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: equality versus identity
,
10/15/2001 00:12, John S. Denker
Re: Saturday Morning Puzzle, Finale
,
10/15/2001 00:18, brian whatcott
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 00:25, John Clement
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 11:15, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 11:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: The concept of potential energy.
,
10/15/2001 11:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Energy analogies
,
10/15/2001 11:45, Chuck Britton
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 13:01, Carl E. Mungan
E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 14:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 14:21, kowalskil
Re: E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 14:28, Hugh Haskell
Re: E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 14:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 14:41, kowalskil
Re: E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 14:45, Strickert, Rick
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 14:53, kowalskil
Spring potential energy without Work (sort of)
,
10/15/2001 14:59, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 15:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 15:18, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 15:32, John S. Denker
Re: Spring potential energy without Work (sort of)
,
10/15/2001 15:38, Robert Cohen
Re: E. Fermi stamp
,
10/15/2001 15:42, Strickert, Rick
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 17:37, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 17:55, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 19:52, crawford j maccallum
(energy=ability to do work)
,
10/15/2001 21:19, Chuck Britton
Re: Spring potential energy without Work (sort of)
,
10/15/2001 21:39, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: (energy=ability to do work)
,
10/15/2001 21:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 22:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 22:08, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Spring potential energy without Work (sort of)
,
10/15/2001 23:12, John Clement
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 23:19, Joe Heafner
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/15/2001 23:24, Joe Heafner
Some Numerical Integrations of Cavendish's Bobs
,
10/16/2001 00:30, brian whatcott
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 08:36, John S. Denker
Re: (energy=ability to do work)
,
10/16/2001 11:14, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 11:35, Rick Tarara
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 11:51, Joe Heafner
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 12:08, Roger Haar
Question about F = MA
,
10/16/2001 12:39, Carl Gaither
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 12:58, John S. Denker
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 13:00, Carl E. Mungan
F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 13:13, Robert Cohen
Carl Mungan in TPT (Spool Acceleration Note)
,
10/16/2001 13:28, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 13:29, Joe Heafner
AAPT Update 2001 Number 9 (fwd)
,
10/16/2001 13:30, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 13:34, John S. Denker
Re: Spring potential energy without Work (sort of)
,
10/16/2001 13:34, Robert Cohen
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 13:39, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 13:43, Robert Cohen
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 13:46, John S. Denker
Re: Spring potential energy without Work (sort of)
,
10/16/2001 13:49, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 14:03, David Bowman
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 14:07, kowalskil
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 14:15, John S. Denker
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 14:28, Jack Uretsky
torus?
,
10/16/2001 14:28, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 14:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 14:39, Michael Edmiston
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 14:53, Robert Cohen
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 14:58, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 15:04, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 15:42, Michael Edmiston
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 15:50, Kossom
Re: Question about F = MA
,
10/16/2001 15:50, Bernard Cleyet
value of g in black holes
,
10/16/2001 15:55, Dwight K. Souder
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 15:55, Jack Uretsky
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 16:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 16:40, Michael Edmiston
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 16:59, Michael Edmiston
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 17:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 17:11, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 17:25, Michael Edmiston
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 18:10, Robert Cohen
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 18:12, Joe Heafner
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/16/2001 18:13, Larry Cartwright
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 18:20, Robert Cohen
Re: F=ma: law or theory?
,
10/16/2001 19:02, Chuck Britton
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 20:01, kowalskil
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 21:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: authorities
,
10/16/2001 22:03, John S. Denker
Derivative of KE
,
10/16/2001 22:04, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 22:27, Joe Heafner
Re: Derivative of KE
,
10/16/2001 23:08, Hugh Haskell
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/16/2001 23:36, Ludwik Kowalski
"Re: operational F, m, and a"
,
10/17/2001 00:45, Richard Hake
Re: Derivative of KE
,
10/17/2001 01:24, John S. Denker
Re: torus?
,
10/17/2001 01:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: torus?
,
10/17/2001 04:52, Chuck Britton
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/17/2001 07:36, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/17/2001 08:09, brian whatcott
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/17/2001 08:42, Joe Heafner
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/17/2001 09:22, John S. Denker
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 09:27, John S. Denker
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 10:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/17/2001 10:44, RAUBER, JOEL
On the use of "authority"
,
10/17/2001 10:50, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/17/2001 11:08, John S. Denker
LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?
,
10/17/2001 11:13, Carter, Tom
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 11:25, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/17/2001 11:33, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: authorities
,
10/17/2001 12:00, Alan J. Scott
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 12:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 12:38, Roger Haar
Re: LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?
,
10/17/2001 13:05, Chuck Britton
Re: LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?
,
10/17/2001 13:18, Scott Goelzer
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 13:29, Joe Heafner
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/17/2001 14:26, Carl E. Mungan
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/17/2001 14:45, Carl E. Mungan
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/17/2001 14:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: torus?
,
10/17/2001 14:56, RAUBER, JOEL
World Trade Center engineering
,
10/17/2001 15:05, Larry Cartwright
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 15:06, John S. Denker
String Theory and Gravity
,
10/17/2001 15:13, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/17/2001 15:17, Tom Wayburn
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 15:20, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/17/2001 15:22, Tom Wayburn
Re: LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?
,
10/17/2001 16:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/17/2001 16:21, Michael Edmiston
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 16:40, kowalskil
Question on Repulsive Casimir Force.
,
10/17/2001 18:50, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Question on Repulsive Casimir Force.
,
10/17/2001 20:08, Dennis Krause
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/17/2001 20:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/17/2001 21:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Question on Repulsive Casimir Force.
,
10/18/2001 00:26, Bernard Cleyet
[Fwd: Re: LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?]
,
10/18/2001 00:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Work and Energy and Thermo
,
10/18/2001 00:48, Tom Wayburn
Fw: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/18/2001 00:51, Tom Wayburn
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/18/2001 01:02, John S. Denker
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/18/2001 01:49, John Mallinckrodt
Engineer interviewed about WTC collapse
,
10/18/2001 02:51, Glenn Carlson
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/18/2001 09:09, John S. Denker
Re: Work and Energy and Thermo
,
10/18/2001 09:16, John S. Denker
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/18/2001 09:30, John S. Denker
Re: torus?
,
10/18/2001 09:58, Chuck Britton
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/18/2001 10:02, Michael Edmiston
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/18/2001 10:18, Jack Uretsky
Re: Crocodiles problem.
,
10/18/2001 12:09, Jeff Marx
Re: torus?
,
10/18/2001 12:12, David Bowman
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 12:55, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Crocodiles problem.
,
10/18/2001 12:56, brian whatcott
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/18/2001 13:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Fwd: Re: LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?]
,
10/18/2001 13:58, Kossom
Crocodiles problem.
,
10/18/2001 14:11, kowalskil
Re: Crocodiles problem.
,
10/18/2001 14:43, kowalskil
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 15:17, Vic Decarlo
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 15:51, Carl E. Mungan
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 16:02, John Mallinckrodt
Re: =93, =85, =94 etc.
,
10/18/2001 16:06, Jim Green
=93, =85, =94 etc.
,
10/18/2001 16:12, kowalskil
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/18/2001 16:18, John S. Denker
Re: arbitrary choice of zero potential
,
10/18/2001 16:31, kowalskil
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 16:35, Vic Decarlo
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/18/2001 16:49, John S. Denker
Re: torus?
,
10/18/2001 17:25, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Question on Repulsive Casimir Force.
,
10/18/2001 17:32, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Question on Repulsive Casimir Force.
,
10/18/2001 17:42, Robert B Zannelli
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/18/2001 17:47, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 18:06, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: arbitrary choice of zero of potential
,
10/18/2001 18:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/18/2001 18:16, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a
,
10/18/2001 18:19, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/18/2001 18:20, John Mallinckrodt
Automatic flushers
,
10/18/2001 20:06, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/18/2001 20:43, brian whatcott
UFO Samples
,
10/18/2001 21:30, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/18/2001 22:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Fwd: Re: LoggerPro problems with Macs G-3s?]
,
10/18/2001 23:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: torus?
,
10/18/2001 23:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/18/2001 23:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Question on Repulsive Casimir Force.
,
10/18/2001 23:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: =93, =85, =94 etc.
,
10/19/2001 00:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: value of g in black holes
,
10/19/2001 01:37, Jack Uretsky
Re: value of g in black holes (long)
,
10/19/2001 06:01, David Bowman
Re: value of g in black holes (erratum) & =3D
,
10/19/2001 08:58, David Bowman
Re: value of g in black holes (erratum) & =3D
,
10/19/2001 09:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 09:32, Michael Edmiston
Amazing deals on software
,
10/19/2001 09:38, Cindy Schwarz
Ps on software
,
10/19/2001 09:43, Cindy Schwarz
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 10:23, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: 3D
,
10/19/2001 10:30, David Bowman
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 10:38, Clarence Bennett
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 10:42, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 10:54, John S. Denker
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 10:57, Paul O. Johnson
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 11:01, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 11:23, John S. Denker
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 12:07, Michael Edmiston
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 12:32, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 12:48, John S. Denker
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 13:06, brian whatcott
Re: value of g in black holes (erratum) & =3D
,
10/19/2001 13:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 13:24, Greg Puskar
N III Asphalt picture
,
10/19/2001 13:27, Michael Porter
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 13:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: 3D
,
10/19/2001 13:46, Robert Cohen
Re: =93, =85, =94 etc.
,
10/19/2001 13:48, William Beaty
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 14:13, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 14:15, William Beaty
try ufoskeptic.org
,
10/19/2001 14:18, William Beaty
Tide article
,
10/19/2001 14:22, Larry Woolf
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 14:24, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 14:30, William Beaty
Re: UFO Samples
,
10/19/2001 14:42, Alan J. Scott
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 14:43, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 15:00, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 15:38, Robert Cohen
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 15:44, Jon Greenberg
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 16:27, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 16:28, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 16:38, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 16:39, Robert Cohen
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 16:49, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Tide article
,
10/19/2001 16:51, Jim Green
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 17:01, Paul O. Johnson
Re: =93, =85, =94 etc.
,
10/19/2001 17:02, Jim Green
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 17:12, Michael Edmiston
RESET of F=ma and operational definitions of force.
,
10/19/2001 17:36, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 17:40, Michael Edmiston
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 17:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Tide article
,
10/19/2001 17:45, brian whatcott
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 18:07, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 18:09, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 18:45, Jim Green
Re: RESET of F=ma and operational definitions of force.
,
10/19/2001 18:46, brian whatcott
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/19/2001 19:00, Larry Woolf
Re: UFO Samples
,
10/19/2001 21:10, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY BEFORE Q
,
10/19/2001 21:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 21:56, brian whatcott
Re: Automatic flushers
,
10/19/2001 23:12, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 00:17, Jim Green
Test Message #7 - Please Ignore/Delete
,
10/20/2001 04:27, Larry Cartwright
Test Message #8 - Please Ignore/Delete
,
10/20/2001 04:29, Larry Cartwright
Test Message #9 - Please Ignore/Delete
,
10/20/2001 04:31, Larry Cartwright
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/20/2001 05:24, John S. Denker
Re: PE=mgh
,
10/20/2001 05:41, John S. Denker
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 08:57, brian whatcott
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 10:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/20/2001 11:38, Robert Cohen
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 12:40, Jim Green
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 18:23, Chuck Britton
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 18:41, Jim Green
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 19:12, Chuck Britton
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 19:57, Jim Green
Re: Tide article
,
10/20/2001 23:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Work and Energy and Thermo
,
10/21/2001 00:09, Tom Wayburn
ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/21/2001 00:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tide article
,
10/21/2001 01:30, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/21/2001 08:46, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tide article
,
10/21/2001 11:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Tide article
,
10/21/2001 14:36, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/21/2001 17:37, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/21/2001 19:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tide article
,
10/21/2001 19:15, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/21/2001 19:26, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/21/2001 21:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tide article
,
10/21/2001 22:04, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 00:08, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 01:23, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 02:27, John S. Denker
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/22/2001 08:56, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 09:50, Robert Cohen
Re: operational F, m, and a (velocity measurements with fish-scal es)
,
10/22/2001 10:37, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Work and Energy and Thermo
,
10/22/2001 10:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q (not changing definitions later)
,
10/22/2001 10:50, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: oops ENERGY WITH Q (not changing definitions later)
,
10/22/2001 11:05, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 12:10, Chuck Britton
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 12:22, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 13:12, brian whatcott
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 19 Oct 2001 to 20 Oct 2001 (#2001-411)
,
10/22/2001 13:45, Carl E. Mungan
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 13:56, Carl E. Mungan
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 14:06, Carl E. Mungan
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 14:10, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 14:42, Robert Cohen
kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/22/2001 14:57, Joe Heafner
Re: List of Physics departments with WWW homepages
,
10/22/2001 15:20, Larry Smith
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 15:33, Chuck Britton
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 15:45, Robert Cohen
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/22/2001 16:27, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 16:34, kowalskil
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 19:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tide article
,
10/22/2001 19:47, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 20:26, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/22/2001 21:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Viruses and Worms
,
10/22/2001 22:12, Larry Cartwright
Re: Viruses and Worms
,
10/22/2001 23:14, Hugh Haskell
Re: Viruses and Worms
,
10/23/2001 00:28, John Clement
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/23/2001 09:32, Carl E. Mungan
Pulsed gravity orbits (was Re: kinetic energy paradox?)
,
10/23/2001 09:57, John Mallinckrodt
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/23/2001 10:20, Joe Heafner
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/23/2001 11:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/23/2001 11:44, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/23/2001 12:11, John S. Denker
Re: Pulsed gravity orbits (was Re: kinetic energy paradox?)
,
10/23/2001 13:06, brian whatcott
"Owner" of potential energy.
,
10/23/2001 13:10, Dario Moreno
Re: Pulsed gravity orbits (was Re: kinetic energy paradox?)
,
10/23/2001 14:13, David Bowman
microscopic doodads
,
10/23/2001 15:29, Carl E. Mungan
fields
,
10/23/2001 17:30, Peter Craft
fields
,
10/23/2001 17:31, Peter Craft
Re: "Owner" of potential energy.
,
10/23/2001 19:29, Jim Green
Pendulum acceleration
,
10/23/2001 21:55, Tim O'Donnell
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/23/2001 22:19, kowalskil
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/23/2001 23:04, Herb Schulz
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 02:36, Mark Sylvester
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 03:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Electric Field Lines
,
10/24/2001 06:19, Ed Schweber
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 07:29, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 07:46, Savinainen Antti
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 08:25, John S. Denker
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 08:35, Tom Ford
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 08:41, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/24/2001 08:41, John S. Denker
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 08:43, Kilmer, Skip
Fw: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/24/2001 08:44, Tom Wayburn
Re: Fw: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/24/2001 08:53, John S. Denker
Re: Fw: Why work before energy in texts
,
10/24/2001 09:27, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 09:50, Herb Schulz
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 10:32, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 10:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 10:41, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/24/2001 10:49, RAUBER, JOEL
Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 12:26, Tina Fanetti
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 12:37, Spagna Jr., George
What owns gravitational potential energy mgh
,
10/24/2001 12:37, Sandin
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 12:52, Cooper John N
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 13:16, Joe Heafner
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 13:16, Jerry Hester
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 13:20, John S. Denker
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 13:47, Keith C. Tipton
Re: "Owner" of potential energy.
,
10/24/2001 14:07, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 14:08, Robert J. Beichner
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 14:08, Robert Cohen
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 14:11, Hugh Haskell
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/24/2001 14:25, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 14:50, Strickert, Rick
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/24/2001 15:03, Joe Heafner
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 15:13, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 15:28, Rick Tarara
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 17:12, kowalskil
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/24/2001 17:15, kowalskil
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 17:57, brian whatcott
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 18:11, Beth L Pennington
Re: kinetic energy paradox?
,
10/24/2001 20:37, Justin Parke
Pushing a car uphill
,
10/24/2001 21:02, Edwin K Seppa
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/24/2001 21:12, Chuck Britton
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 22:44, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/24/2001 22:59, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 23:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Obnoxious Student
,
10/24/2001 23:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/24/2001 23:30, Bernard Cleyet
Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 01:40, Larry Cartwright
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 02:10, Mark Sylvester
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 05:26, Ed Schweber
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 06:48, brian whatcott
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 06:54, brian whatcott
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 07:16, brian whatcott
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 08:06, Tom Ford
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 08:18, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 09:06, Chuck Britton
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 09:54, Rick Tarara
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 11:14, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 11:19, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 11:28, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 11:29, Jim Green
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 11:45, Rick Tarara
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 12:21, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 12:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 12:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 12:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 13:10, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 13:12, brian whatcott
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:13, David Bowman
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 13:18, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 13:18, John S. Denker
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:36, Sandin
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:40, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Electric Field Lines
,
10/25/2001 13:41, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 13:48, kowalskil
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:48, Sandin
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:51, David Bowman
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 13:54, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 14:05, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 14:42, Tom Ford
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 15:12, Hugh Haskell
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 15:24, John S. Denker
FW: a4
,
10/25/2001 15:24, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 15:33, Robert Cohen
Re: FW: a4
,
10/25/2001 16:00, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: FW: a4
,
10/25/2001 16:09, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 16:18, David Bowman
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 16:41, kowalskil
Re: Pushing a car uphill
,
10/25/2001 16:46, cliff parker
Odyssey Orbit
,
10/25/2001 17:15, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Pushing a car on a level surface
,
10/25/2001 18:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
rolling
,
10/25/2001 18:21, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Paint the Moon
,
10/25/2001 18:29, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/25/2001 18:47, kowalskil
Re: Pushing a car on a level surface
,
10/25/2001 18:48, brian whatcott
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/25/2001 19:10, Larry Woolf
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/25/2001 20:23, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/25/2001 20:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: rolling
,
10/25/2001 20:43, Hugh Haskell
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/25/2001 23:17, Bernard Cleyet
Odyssey Orbit -vocabulary
,
10/25/2001 23:24, SSHS KPHOX
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 00:13, Jim Green
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 00:53, Larry Cartwright
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 01:07, Jim Green
Re: Odyssey Orbit -vocabulary
,
10/26/2001 01:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 02:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 04:08, Larry Cartwright
Re: Odessey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 05:11, David Bowman
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 05:11, David Bowman
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 07:10, Richard L Bowman
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 10:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 10:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 12:09, John S. Denker
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 12:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 12:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 12:49, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 13:18, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 13:35, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 15:18, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 15:32, Carl E. Mungan
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 16:20, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 17:31, John S. Denker
Re: Odyssey Orbit
,
10/26/2001 19:08, Peter Schoch
Pendulum acceleration
,
10/26/2001 20:59, Dario Moreno
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/26/2001 22:07, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Pendulum acceleration
,
10/26/2001 23:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 03:11, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 09:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 11:20, Robert Cohen
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 13:08, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 13:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 14:22, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 15:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 16:05, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 18:21, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 18:28, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 19:39, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 20:24, Jim Green
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 21:45, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/27/2001 22:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/28/2001 10:05, Robert Cohen
Chladni's Figures
,
10/28/2001 11:30, brian whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/28/2001 11:54, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Lycopodium powder, was Chladni's Figures
,
10/28/2001 13:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/28/2001 13:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Chladni's Figures
,
10/28/2001 15:04, Greg Darakjian
Re: Lycopodium powder, was Chladni's Figures
,
10/28/2001 15:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Crocodiles problem.
,
10/28/2001 19:09, Michael Bowen
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/28/2001 21:36, Ludwik Kowalski
AAPT Update 2001 Number 10 (fwd)
,
10/29/2001 13:55, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 16:21, Carl E. Mungan
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 16:27, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 16:36, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 17:34, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 17:37, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 18:18, John S. Denker
force and PE without calculus
,
10/29/2001 18:33, Joe Heafner
Re: force and PE without calculus
,
10/29/2001 20:04, Hugh Haskell
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/29/2001 22:56, Tim Folkerts
ELASTIC POTENTIAL?
,
10/29/2001 23:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: ELASTIC POTENTIAL?
,
10/30/2001 07:34, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 08:30, Carl E. Mungan
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 09:28, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 09:35, Bob Sciamanda
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 10:01, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 10:25, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 10:29, John S. Denker
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 11:28, Bob Sciamanda
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 11:46, RAUBER, JOEL
Impulse
,
10/30/2001 12:02, Tina Fanetti
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 12:58, Tina Fanetti
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 12:59, John S. Denker
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 13:04, Timothy Wilson
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 13:08, John S. Denker
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 13:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 13:24, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 13:29, Joseph Bellina
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 13:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 13:59, John S. Denker
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 14:38, Tina Fanetti
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 14:51, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/30/2001 15:28, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 15:44, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 15:47, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 16:08, Tina Fanetti
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 17:00, cliff parker
Re: Elastic Potential?
,
10/30/2001 17:32, Glenn Carlson
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 20:09, Justin Parke
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 20:19, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 21:17, cliff parker
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 21:25, cliff parker
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 21:50, Chuck Britton
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 21:55, Chuck Britton
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 21:58, cliff parker
Re: Impulse
,
10/30/2001 23:13, Larry Cartwright
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 00:32, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 01:27, Larry Cartwright
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 06:27, Brian Whatcott
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 06:31, Brian Whatcott
Masscon Mapping.
,
10/31/2001 06:44, Brian Whatcott
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 06:58, Brian Whatcott
Masscon Mapping.
,
10/31/2001 08:27, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Masscon Mapping.
,
10/31/2001 08:37, Chuck Britton
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/31/2001 08:39, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 09:49, Justin Parke
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 10:10, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 10:13, John S. Denker
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 10:15, Joseph Bellina
Re: Chladni's Figures
,
10/31/2001 10:52, William Beaty
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 11:15, Larry Smith
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 11:27, Chuck Britton
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 12:38, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 12:51, Tina Fanetti
PSSC
,
10/31/2001 13:04, Tina Fanetti
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 13:07, Brian Whatcott
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:08, David T. Marx
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:17, Larry Smith
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:22, Joe Heafner
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:38, Rick Tarara
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 13:39, Chuck Britton
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:44, Allen Shotwell
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:47, Hugh Haskell
Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 13:55, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 13:57, Joe Heafner
Re: PSSC
,
10/31/2001 13:59, Hugh Haskell
Teaching loads
,
10/31/2001 14:07, Mariam Dittman
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 14:17, John S. Denker
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 14:21, Tom Ford
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 14:36, Peter Schoch
Re: Impulse
,
10/31/2001 14:38, Carl E. Mungan
Re: PSSC
,
10/31/2001 14:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/31/2001 14:58, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 15:01, John Barrer
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 15:04, Spagna Jr., George
Re: PSSC
,
10/31/2001 15:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 15:07, John Barrer
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 15:08, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Teaching loads
,
10/31/2001 15:14, Joe Heafner
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 15:16, Waggoner, Bill
Re: PSSC
,
10/31/2001 15:18, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: ENERGY WITH Q
,
10/31/2001 15:26, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Teaching loads
,
10/31/2001 15:39, Waggoner, Bill
Re: Teaching loads
,
10/31/2001 15:46, Allen Shotwell
Re: Value of Homework
,
10/31/2001 15:57, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Computers
,
10/31/2001 16:12, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 16:18, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 16:44, Hugh Haskell
Computers
,
10/31/2001 16:50, John milton
Re: Teaching loads
,
10/31/2001 16:54, Peter Schoch
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 18:02, Ed and Laura Eckel
Re: Teaching loads
,
10/31/2001 18:21, Joe Heafner
Re: Masscon Mapping.
,
10/31/2001 20:07, Brian Whatcott
Re: Returning of tests
,
10/31/2001 20:23, Rick Tarara
Centripetal F from friction
,
10/31/2001 22:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Centripetal F from friction
,
10/31/2001 22:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Centripetal F from friction
,
10/31/2001 23:54, Hugh Haskell
Re: accelerated stalls
,
11/01/2001 01:49, John S. Denker
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc