Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 09:19 AM 9/17/01 -0600, Jim Green wrote:
I continue to be disturbed at the archaic language of energy as a
substance -- One would think that physicists would try to say things
correctly. It is the business of a physicist to be precise -- We try to
teach our students precision -- Why do we cling to the past?
I never said energy _per se_ was a material substance.
I implied, and hereby state explicitly, that energy is a conserved quantity
and flows according to a local conservation law:
change(stuff inside boundary) = -flow(stuff across boundary)
This is one of the most elegant and most useful principles of physics.