yes, you are right. i can't imagine a way to prove that energy is not
created or destroyed. it is also BEYOND logical reasoning, because it is not
yet a proven fact. by "logical reasoning" i assume you mean referencing to
already proven facts as a basis of your thoughts and information.
do any of these ideas belong in a physics list? well, i hope so. a lot of
these ideas are right-brained ideas that i am trying to find logical
explanations for. i don't think too many people analyze the intelligence of
energy. what a foriegn concept that is. especially to someone that really
knows physics, because it is hard to prove.
now if what i said before irratates you, that was not my intention. it seems
like when you start delving into ideas like ESP and pyschic phenomenon - or
the intelligence of energy, physics majors start getting cranky. why?
because these subjects are hard to prove, and therefor - not worthy of
consideration.
i will be the FIRST person to say "don't believe a word i say". it IS
important to use other people's experiences as a guide, i think.
now, if you don't like a particular thread - delete it. i am not trying to
flame anyone, but i also expect the same consideration.
Justin
Experimental evidence and logical reasoning are conspicuously absent from
this thread.
But this thread is so deeply
submerged in the miasma of idle speculation that I don't know where to
begin.
One does not begin the learning process by "spitting out" vaporous
theories. One begins by learning a few well-known facts. The number of
possible theories that can exist in the absence of facts is infinite, and
it is a colossal waste of time to discuss them. One simply must know a few
facts before beginning to theorize, in order to keep the number of
hypotheses under control. It also helps to know the procedures for
distinguishing a valid logical inference from an invalid one.
Feynman's book _The Character of Physical Law_ might be a good place to
start.