monopolistic practices

[Chuck Britton <britton@NCSSM.EDU>]

About 50 years or so ago, GM was found guilty of the of of buying up
the electric trolly systems of many cities and replacing them with
diesel bus systems.

They paid heavy fines for such actions.
GM had to pay $5000 and each top executive was fined $1.00!




At 11:51 AM -0400 7/30/01, John S. Denker,  you wrote about Re: Old Computers:


> Fact: Microsoft has been found guilty of intentionally doing this.
>
> If you care about the facts, please read the Court's Finding of Fact
>    http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm
> especially sections such as
>   http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm#vi
>
> Note that the appeals court upheld these findings of fact.  (There is some
> question about what the _penalty_ should be, but that's a separate question.)
>
> Fact:  In a non-monopolized situation, there are such things as
> standards.  There are such things as iterop conferences and bake-offs,
> where providers meet to work out any inadvertent
> incompatibilities.  Example: several of my friends are going to:
>   http://www.vpnc.org/bakeoff.html
>
> This generally results in a very high degree of interoperability.

--

 .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-
    \   /   \   /   \ N /   \ C /   \ S /   \ S /   \ M /   \   /   \   /
     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'
Chuck Britton                                   Education is what is left when
britton@ncssm.edu                               you have forgotten everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math         you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366  x224                            Albert Einstein,        1936