Re: E-M fields health risks

[Doug Craigen <dcc@ESCAPE.CA>]

William Beaty wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Doug Craigen wrote:
> > Skin depth wouldn't be an applicable quantity here.
>
> Skin depth tells you the thickness of conductor needed for shielding
> constant-frequency fields, be they radiation or nearfield (such as the
> alternating b-field near a power line.)

I hate the taste of crow, but at least I'm getting used to it.  Bill is
right of course,  I've figured out where my reasoning went wrong, but
there's no use bothering the list with it.

\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\_/^\

Doug Craigen
          http://www.dctech.com/physics/about_dc.html