Re: E-M fields health risks

[Chuck Britton <britton@NCSSM.EDU>]

At 3:26 PM -0700 7/19/01, William Beaty,  you wrote about Re: E-M
fields health risks:
> One thing has changed recently in the official response to EM danger
> scares:  knowledgeable people have stopped insisting that low freq AC
> magnetic fields cannot produce bioeffects.
>
> The exact mechanism involved is still unknown as far as I know, but the
> controversy has shifted from "magnetic fields do not measurably affect
> biochem", to "magnetic fields do not pose a signficant health risk."

The results show that 60Hz E-M fields INCREASE cell growth slightly.
So maybe cancer cells are more strongly sped up than e-coli etc?????
--

 .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-
    \   /   \   /   \ N /   \ C /   \ S /   \ S /   \ M /   \   /   \   /
     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'
Chuck Britton                                   Education is what is left when
britton@ncssm.edu                               you have forgotten everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math         you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366  x224                            Albert Einstein,        1936