g-2 (fwd)

[Jack Uretsky <jlu@HEP.ANL.GOV>]

Hi all-
        Here is the nail in the coffin for the claim of new physics.
                                Regards,
                                        Jack

--
While [Jane] Austen's majestic use of language is surely diminished in its
translation to English, it is hoped that the following translation conveys
at least a sense of her exquisite command of her native tongue.
                        Greg Nagan from "Sense and Sensibility" in
                     <The 5-MINUTE ILIAD and Other Classics>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:58:46 -0600
From: "C K Zachos (630)2526207" <zachos@hep.anl.gov>
To: jlu <jlu@hep.anl.gov>
Subject: g-2

http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0102312

Title: abstract hep-ph/0102312

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, abstract
hep-ph/0102312

From: fjy <fjy@delta.ft.uam.es>
Date (v1): Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:44:17 GMT   (6kb)
Date (revised v2): Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:19:23 GMT   (6kb)

Disagreement between standard model and experiment for muon g-2 ?

Author: F. J. Yndurain
Comments: PlainTeX; 3 p. 1 figure. Misplrint in Eq.(4) corrected
Report-no: FTUAM 01-04

> In a recent experimental paper reporting a precise measurement of the muon
> anomalous magnetic moment, Brown et al. claim disagreement of their result with
> evaluations based on the standard model. This claim is based on comparison with
> a single theoretical evaluation. It is pointed out that other equally
> legitimate theoretical evaluations exist in the literature, with which the new
> experimental figure is quite compatible. The claim of indications for new
> physics beyond the standard model does not appear justified.

Paper: Source (6kb), PostScript, or Other formats

 (N.B.: delivery types and potential problems)

refers to , cited by

---

Links to: arXiv, hep-ph, /find, /abs (-/+), /0102, ?

---

www-admin@arXiv.org