Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: intermolecular forces



Thanks to John S. Denker for mentioning his note of Monday. I had missed
that. And I do agree that the quantum description does give us some useful
handles. However, as a physics teacher and molecular researcher, I like to
remind myself and my students of the very basic underlying concepts (even
if we don't get involved with them at the level of detailed calculations).

So, here I simply go back to Schrodinger's equation and remember that for
atoms (and molecules, at some level of approximation) we solve the energy
equation for the behavior of an electron in the presense of the Coulombic
(electrostatic) potential.

And whether we talk about (what chemists call) Leonard-Jones potentials
or van der Waals forces or whatever model, we are still modeling the
electrostatic interactions between particles.

John also wrote today:
Similarly, to return to the uncharged gas in a piston that I mentioned at
09:16 AM 2/11/01 -0500, you could argue that "normally" the gas particles
interact with the piston via electrostatic forces at impact. But what
happens if I coat the surface of the piston with some hypothetical material
that repels the gas via some magnetic interaction, or some nuclear
interaction, or whatever? The measured pressure is unchanged. The
pressure does not depend on the nature of the interaction. It only depends
on the kinetic energy via the quantum statistics.

But in fact this is what I referred to as the "hard sphere"
approximation. At its basic level, all such interactions are in fact not
totally elastic. Some energy is lost in the interaction with the walls and
the kinetic energy (temperature) of the gas decreases with time. Which is
what happens dramatically in magnetic confinement in fusion reactors, I
believe.

I may be applying too fine a distinction to this discussion, but I thought
that was what Tucker Hiatt was asking about when he questioned whether
there were only four basic forces in our universe or not.

Richard Bowman
Bridgewater College