Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of January, 2001
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
12/31/2000 23:35, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Ph.D's and telephone booths
,
01/01/2001 07:02, brian whatcott
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 12:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 13:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Ph.D's and telephone booths
,
01/01/2001 14:55, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 16:23, Jack Uretsky
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 17:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 17:17, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 19:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 19:48, Jack Uretsky
Experiments At Super K
,
01/01/2001 20:28, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/01/2001 22:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Test Message
,
01/02/2001 04:21, Steven Ratliff
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/02/2001 07:35, Ludwik Kowalski
induced dipole moments (correction)
,
01/02/2001 08:58, Jack Uretsky
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/02/2001 09:09, Jack Uretsky
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/02/2001 12:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Los Alamos Science online
,
01/02/2001 14:00, Peter Schoch
Monthly Technical Posting for PHYS-L
,
01/02/2001 14:38, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Induced dipole moments
,
01/02/2001 15:44, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Stability (was Earnshaw's theorem)
,
01/02/2001 16:54, Bob Sciamanda
Stability (was Earnshaw's theorem)
,
01/02/2001 17:22, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Titles
,
01/02/2001 20:58, Doug Craigen
Re: equal gravity
,
01/03/2001 12:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: equal gravity
,
01/03/2001 13:10, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: equal gravity
,
01/03/2001 13:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: equal gravity
,
01/03/2001 14:20, Leigh Palmer
Toward the equilibrium
,
01/03/2001 17:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/03/2001 17:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/03/2001 20:37, brian whatcott
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 09:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 10:26, Tim Folkerts
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 10:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 11:15, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Happy New Year
,
01/04/2001 11:48, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 14:49, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 15:11, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Happy New Year
,
01/04/2001 17:06, crawford j maccallum
San Diego Tech Meeting 1/06 (fwd)
,
01/04/2001 18:08, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 18:44, brian whatcott
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/04/2001 19:01, brian whatcott
Re: San Diego Tech Meeting 1/06 (fwd)
,
01/04/2001 19:40, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Happy New Year
,
01/04/2001 22:30, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Happy New Year
,
01/04/2001 22:38, Doug Craigen
Re: San Diego Tech Meeting 1/06 (fwd)
,
01/05/2001 01:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Experiments At Super K
,
01/05/2001 03:01, Leigh Palmer
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 08:00, brian whatcott
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 10:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 11:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 12:02, Tim Folkerts
Re: Experiments At Super K
,
01/05/2001 12:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 13:24, brian whatcott
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 14:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Happy New Year
,
01/05/2001 14:37, David Bowman
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 14:42, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 15:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Experiments At Super K
,
01/05/2001 17:10, Robert B Zannelli
Re: Experiments At Super K
,
01/05/2001 18:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/05/2001 19:08, brian whatcott
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/06/2001 08:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/06/2001 09:40, John Denker
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/06/2001 10:12, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/06/2001 12:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Toward the equilibrium (and getting close)
,
01/06/2001 13:01, brian whatcott
Success in scientific theory
,
01/06/2001 13:51, Carl C. Gaither
Re: Toward the equilibrium (and getting close)
,
01/06/2001 14:50, brian whatcott
Re: Success in scientific theory
,
01/06/2001 18:27, Leigh Palmer
Out of Pocket for a Few Weeks
,
01/07/2001 08:03, brian whatcott
address change
,
01/07/2001 23:12, Pete Lohstreter
equal gravity
,
01/08/2001 10:46, Dwight K. Souder
[Fwd: Colloquium 12 Jan 01]
,
01/08/2001 18:47, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
feather color
,
01/09/2001 21:38, cliff parker
Re: feather color
,
01/09/2001 22:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: feather color
,
01/09/2001 23:11, cliff parker
Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 01:09, Eric Asselin
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 01:54, William Beaty
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 02:26, Eric Asselin
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 03:24, William Beaty
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 04:13, William Beaty
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 08:14, John Denker
Re: feather color
,
01/10/2001 08:38, John Denker
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 08:53, Justin Parke
Opportunity
,
01/10/2001 10:39, kyle forinash
Re: feather color
,
01/10/2001 10:48, Larry Woolf
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 11:02, Larry Woolf
"chatoyance"
,
01/10/2001 11:06, Chuck Britton
Re: "chatoyance"
,
01/10/2001 12:10, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Transformer power consumption
,
01/10/2001 14:17, Raymond Rogoway
Re: "chatoyance"
,
01/10/2001 14:28, Chuck Britton
Found: 2 Planetary Systems. Result: Astronomers Stunned. [New York Times]
,
01/10/2001 14:32, David Lunney
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/10/2001 14:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: Toward the equilibrium
,
01/10/2001 17:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "chatoyance"
,
01/11/2001 14:23, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Ferroelectric curiosity (Fwd)
,
01/11/2001 14:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "chatoyance"
,
01/11/2001 14:51, Joseph Bellina
Re: Transformer power consumption
,
01/11/2001 14:55, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: web resources, reliable or otherwise
,
01/11/2001 15:15, John Denker
Re: Transformer power consumption
,
01/11/2001 16:03, Raymond Rogoway
Re: web resources, reliable or otherwise
,
01/11/2001 18:03, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: web resources, reliable or otherwise
,
01/11/2001 18:11, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: "chatoyance"
,
01/11/2001 18:39, Chuck Britton
Re: Group velocites greater than the speed of light
,
01/11/2001 20:29, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
A Request
,
01/12/2001 09:29, Rick Tarara
Re: A Request
,
01/12/2001 17:05, frank cange
Superluminal paradox? (de bunked)
,
01/12/2001 20:13, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Rick Tarara's multimedia project; making multimedia more accessible
,
01/13/2001 15:12, David Lunney
Re: Lift of spinning objects.
,
01/13/2001 21:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Lift of spinning objects.
,
01/14/2001 02:34, John Denker
Capacitor Applications
,
01/14/2001 18:41, Tony Wayne
Lift of spinning objects.
,
01/14/2001 18:52, Scott Goelzer
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/14/2001 23:16, Leigh Palmer
Re: Lift of spinning objects.
,
01/14/2001 23:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/15/2001 01:34, Larry Woolf
Re: Lift of spinning objects.
,
01/15/2001 01:44, Hugh Haskell
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/15/2001 03:30, John Denker
pronunciation inquiry
,
01/15/2001 09:14, Jorge Hoyos
Re: pronunciation inquiry
,
01/15/2001 09:29, John Cooper
errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/15/2001 12:27, John Denker
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/15/2001 13:37, John M. Clement
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/15/2001 15:04, Larry Woolf
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/15/2001 17:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/15/2001 17:34, Mark Sylvester
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/15/2001 19:02, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/15/2001 19:53, John Denker
Re: Capacitor Applications (not posted)
,
01/15/2001 20:22, Leigh Palmer
Curriculum S
,
01/15/2001 20:29, Richard Hake
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/15/2001 20:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor Applications (not posted)
,
01/16/2001 01:21, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Judging books by their covers
,
01/16/2001 04:29, William Beaty
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/16/2001 08:01, Warren Hein
Re: Capacitor Applications
,
01/16/2001 09:51, Michael Edmiston
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/16/2001 10:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: Judging books by their covers
,
01/16/2001 11:10, Larry Woolf
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/16/2001 15:51, Larry Woolf
AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 13:20, Tim O'Donnell
Principia
,
01/17/2001 13:27, William J. Larson
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:20, John S. Denker
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:24, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:34, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:36, Leigh Palmer
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:38, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 14:39, Rick Tarara
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 14:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 14:42, Michael Edmiston
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 14:44, John S. Denker
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:45, Derek Chirnside
prinkipia
,
01/17/2001 14:48, Dr. Mario Diaz
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 14:50, William Beaty
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 14:52, David Emigh
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 14:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 15:08, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 15:09, John S. Denker
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 15:11, Tim O'Donnell
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 15:13, Tim O'Donnell
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 15:13, Jack Uretsky
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 15:39, William J. Larson
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 16:03, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 16:19, Larry Woolf
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 16:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 16:36, Bob Sciamanda
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 16:47, Bob Sciamanda
Re: prinkipia
,
01/17/2001 16:53, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 17:13, Tom Ford
Re: Englifh fpelling
,
01/17/2001 17:22, John S. Denker
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 17:46, John S. Denker
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 18:15, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 18:32, David Bowman
Re: Principia
,
01/17/2001 18:56, Vern Lindberg
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 19:36, Larry Woolf
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 19:53, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 20:08, Ludwik Kowalski
AC electricity in CA
,
01/17/2001 20:24, SSHS KPHOX
streaked windows and lights
,
01/17/2001 20:29, SSHS KPHOX
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 20:49, John S. Denker
Re: streaked windows and lights
,
01/17/2001 20:52, John S. Denker
Re: streaked windows and lights
,
01/17/2001 21:26, William Beaty
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 21:38, William Beaty
Re: AC electricity
,
01/17/2001 23:38, William J. Larson
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 00:27, Michael Bowen
Re: streaked windows and lights
,
01/18/2001 03:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 07:02, John Barrer
Re: Principia
,
01/18/2001 10:04, Paolo Cavallo
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 10:57, Larry Woolf
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 11:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 11:28, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: streaked windows and lights
,
01/18/2001 11:53, SSHS KPHOX
Electrons
,
01/18/2001 12:51, Laurent Hodges
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 12:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 12:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrons
,
01/18/2001 13:05, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrons
,
01/18/2001 13:38, Thomas O'Neill
Re: Electrons
,
01/18/2001 14:04, Michael Edmiston
Normal
,
01/18/2001 14:23, Tim O'Donnell
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 14:41, John Denker
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 14:58, Leigh Palmer
Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 15:08, Larry Smith
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 15:10, Bob Sciamanda
Re: streaked windows and lights
,
01/18/2001 15:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrons
,
01/18/2001 15:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrons
,
01/18/2001 15:22, Richard Bowman
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 15:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 15:57, Chuck Britton
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 15:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 16:16, Chuck Britton
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 16:21, Chuck Britton
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 16:21, David Bowman
Pumped storage etc.
,
01/18/2001 16:30, Laurent Hodges
Re: Normal
,
01/18/2001 16:33, Leigh Palmer
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 16:34, John Denker
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 16:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 16:41, Chuck Britton
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 16:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: Normal
,
01/18/2001 16:43, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 17:22, David Bowman
Re: Electrons
,
01/18/2001 17:23, cliff parker
Re: Pumped storage etc.
,
01/18/2001 17:27, Joel Rauber
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 17:42, cliff parker
domestic heat pumps
,
01/18/2001 17:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 18:12, Leigh Palmer
Re: Normal
,
01/18/2001 18:23, SSHS KPHOX
Re: domestic heat pumps
,
01/18/2001 18:37, John Denker
Re: AC electricity
,
01/18/2001 18:39, David Bowman
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/18/2001 18:55, David Bowman
Lift of spinning objects.
,
01/18/2001 18:56, Dwight K. Souder
Re: Planck mass
,
01/18/2001 19:05, Larry Smith
Poynting field outside a resistor
,
01/18/2001 20:49, William Beaty
Re: Pumped storage etc.
,
01/19/2001 01:33, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Electrons
,
01/19/2001 01:50, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity
,
01/19/2001 08:41, S.Goelzer
Re: AC electricity
,
01/19/2001 10:08, Tim O'Donnell
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/19/2001 10:13, Michael Edmiston
Re: Pumped storage
,
01/19/2001 10:23, Rick Tarara
Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 10:34, Chuck Britton
Nuclear Environmentalist, was Electricity and CA
,
01/19/2001 10:35, Joseph Bellina
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 10:40, Joseph Bellina
Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 10:53, Peter Schoch
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 10:55, Rick Tarara
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 10:56, Peter Schoch
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 11:01, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 11:16, Larry Woolf
The Earth's Environment
,
01/19/2001 11:19, Moore, David
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 11:23, Michael Edmiston
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 11:25, Joel Rauber
Re: Pumped storage etc.
,
01/19/2001 11:44, Marc Kossover
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 11:51, David Bowman
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 12:05, Rick Tarara
Re: The Earth's Environment
,
01/19/2001 12:13, Rick Tarara
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 13:47, Daniel Schroeder
On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/19/2001 13:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Nuclear Environmentalist, was Electricity and CA
,
01/19/2001 14:05, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 14:08, Rick Tarara
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 14:21, Leigh Palmer
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 14:24, Leigh Palmer
Another case of "a little knowledge...."
,
01/19/2001 14:29, Rick Tarara
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 14:31, John S. Denker
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 14:39, Joel Rauber
Re: Another case of "a little knowledge...."
,
01/19/2001 14:43, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 14:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 14:50, Hugh Haskell
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 15:02, Hugh Haskell
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 15:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 15:34, Chuck Britton
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 16:33, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 16:36, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 16:39, Jim Green
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 16:51, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 16:52, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 17:01, Larry Woolf
Re: Pumped storage
,
01/19/2001 17:24, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/19/2001 17:44, Peter Schoch
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 17:48, David Bowman
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 18:37, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 18:41, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Pumped storage
,
01/19/2001 19:09, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 19:48, Rick Tarara
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 20:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/19/2001 21:06, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 01:32, Jim Green
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 02:56, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Pumped storage etc.
,
01/20/2001 03:06, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/20/2001 03:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: AC electricity
,
01/20/2001 03:11, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Strange "Energy" Units
,
01/20/2001 03:33, Leigh Palmer
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 03:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 04:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 04:26, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity
,
01/20/2001 08:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 09:13, Rick Tarara
Faraday, a unit of charge.
,
01/20/2001 10:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/20/2001 12:23, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 12:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 13:46, David Bowman
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/20/2001 13:55, David Bowman
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 14:55, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 15:46, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 16:55, David Bowman
Re: peculiar constants in physical laws
,
01/20/2001 17:03, John Denker
Re: Faraday, a unit of charge
,
01/20/2001 17:35, David Bowman
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 18:01, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity
,
01/20/2001 18:13, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/20/2001 18:22, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Faraday, a unit of charge
,
01/20/2001 19:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: peculiar constants in physical laws
,
01/20/2001 19:58, Ludwik Kowalski
EMF
,
01/20/2001 20:05, SSHS KPHOX
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 20:51, Doug Craigen
Re: EMF
,
01/20/2001 21:12, John Denker
Italian Phys-Sci Ed system: Seeking Help with Questions for MA class
,
01/20/2001 21:29, Dave Menshew
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/20/2001 22:09, John Denker
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/20/2001 23:13, Leigh Palmer
Thanks, and a free E&M textbook
,
01/20/2001 23:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/20/2001 23:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: EMF
,
01/20/2001 23:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/21/2001 11:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/21/2001 14:10, Jack Uretsky
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/21/2001 14:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/21/2001 15:09, Jack Uretsky
Re: EMF
,
01/21/2001 15:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/21/2001 15:33, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: X RAYS
,
01/21/2001 15:54, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/21/2001 16:12, John Denker
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/21/2001 16:16, David Bowman
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/21/2001 17:04, Ludwik Kowalski
archives of physL messages
,
01/21/2001 17:16, Chuck Britton
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/21/2001 22:55, Doug Craigen
The speed of light and our qura'an
,
01/22/2001 06:15, Bassam Shakhreet
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/22/2001 06:35, John Denker
Re: The speed of light and our qura'an
,
01/22/2001 10:09, Chuck Britton
Re: The speed of light and our qura'an
,
01/22/2001 10:55, SSHS KPHOX
Re: AC electricity in CA
,
01/22/2001 10:57, Joel Rauber
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/22/2001 11:19, Joel Rauber
The speed of light and our qura'an (fwd)
,
01/22/2001 12:08, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/22/2001 12:14, Daniel Schroeder
Re: AC electricity
,
01/22/2001 12:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: The speed of light and our qura'an (fwd)
,
01/22/2001 12:56, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Used Textbooks
,
01/22/2001 13:34, Warren Hein
terminology for symmetry of cylinders
,
01/22/2001 14:07, Carl E. Mungan
Re: terminology for symmetry of cylinders
,
01/22/2001 14:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Global Energy etc.
,
01/22/2001 14:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: terminology for symmetry of cylinders
,
01/22/2001 15:41, John Denker
Re: terminology for symmetry of cylinders
,
01/22/2001 16:05, Joel Rauber
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/22/2001 17:22, James McLean
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/22/2001 18:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/22/2001 21:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Light Stopped in It's Tracks!
,
01/22/2001 22:27, Robert B Zannelli
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/22/2001 23:58, Doug Craigen
Re: terminology for symmetry of cylinders
,
01/23/2001 07:14, John Denker
Re: AC electricity
,
01/23/2001 07:29, John Denker
2001 Chautauqua Courses
,
01/23/2001 08:54, Warren Hein
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/23/2001 09:34, Robert A Cohen
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/23/2001 09:50, Joel Rauber
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/23/2001 10:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: errors rife in U.S. science textbooks
,
01/23/2001 11:53, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 12:12, Larry Smith
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 12:21, Joseph Bellina
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/23/2001 12:25, John Denker
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 12:35, John Denker
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 13:20, Leigh Palmer
Conducting Wave-Particle debates with students
,
01/23/2001 14:33, Joe
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 14:38, Chuck Britton
Re: Conducting Wave-Particle debates with students
,
01/23/2001 15:05, John S. Denker
Re: Conducting Wave-Particle debates with students
,
01/23/2001 15:15, Joseph Bellina
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 19 Jan 2001 - Special issue (#2001-23)
,
01/23/2001 15:39, S.Goelzer
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 15:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 15:54, Joseph Bellina
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 19 Jan 2001 - Special issue (#2001-23)
,
01/23/2001 15:54, Rick Tarara
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 16:31, Bob Sciamanda
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 18:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/23/2001 18:19, David Bowman
induction or hysteresis?
,
01/23/2001 18:50, Robert A Cohen
Re: On 1/4*Pi in Coulomb's law
,
01/23/2001 20:09, Doug Craigen
A debate about the possible role of history in Physics teaching
,
01/23/2001 20:22, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
"traffic waves"
,
01/23/2001 23:26, William Beaty
Gravitational Capacity ?
,
01/24/2001 11:22, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: induction or hysteresis?
,
01/24/2001 11:46, Tim Folkerts
database of accel due to gravity
,
01/24/2001 12:18, Mark Brooks Hedstrom
Re: induction or hysteresis?
,
01/24/2001 13:14, William Beaty
Re: Gravitational Capacity ?
,
01/24/2001 13:36, Eric T. Lane
Re: database of accel due to gravity
,
01/24/2001 13:47, Larry Smith
Re: Gravitational Capacity ?
,
01/24/2001 14:41, SSHS KPHOX
Re: On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/24/2001 15:04, Jack Uretsky
Magnetic poles, was On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/24/2001 16:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Magnetic poles, was On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/24/2001 18:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: Conducting Wave-Particle debates with students
,
01/24/2001 19:08, Jack Uretsky
Re: Magnetic poles, was On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/24/2001 19:42, Larry Smith
Re: Magnetic poles, was On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/24/2001 20:20, Jack Uretsky
Re: database of accel due to gravity
,
01/25/2001 00:23, Jim Green
Re: Magnetic poles, was On 1/4*Pi*epsilon in Coulomb's law
,
01/25/2001 01:53, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: database of accel due to gravity
,
01/25/2001 08:44, Chuck Britton
Re: database of accel due to gravity
,
01/25/2001 09:25, Paul O. Johnson
Re: gravity data online
,
01/25/2001 09:57, John Denker
can we say "g"?
,
01/25/2001 11:51, SSHS KPHOX
Ionized air
,
01/25/2001 12:34, Ludwik Kowalski
"acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 13:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 13:56, Joel Rauber
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 14:05, Larry Smith
Re: Ionized air
,
01/25/2001 14:09, John S. Denker
Re: Ionized air
,
01/25/2001 14:38, Michael Edmiston
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/25/2001 15:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/25/2001 15:03, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Ionized air
,
01/25/2001 15:19, Larry Woolf
Re: Ionized air
,
01/25/2001 15:52, William Beaty
Re: Ionized air
,
01/25/2001 16:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/25/2001 17:07, David Bowman
Re: induction or hysteresis?
,
01/25/2001 17:24, Tim Folkerts
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/25/2001 18:25, John S. Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 18:53, Jim Green
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/25/2001 18:55, John S. Denker
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/25/2001 19:25, Jim Green
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 20:03, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: g, acceleration, field
,
01/25/2001 21:21, John Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 21:28, John M. Clement
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 21:48, Jim Green
Re: g, acceleration, field
,
01/25/2001 21:56, Jim Green
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/25/2001 22:07, John Denker
Re: "equals" versus "is"
,
01/25/2001 22:57, John Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/25/2001 23:36, Hugh Haskell
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/26/2001 00:05, Paul O. Johnson
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 00:14, Paul O. Johnson
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 00:16, Hugh Haskell
Physics Review Website
,
01/26/2001 00:30, Carolyn Penstein Rose
Re: "all accelerations are 9.8m/s^2"
,
01/26/2001 01:00, John Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 02:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: accerelation due to gravity
,
01/26/2001 03:29, Savinainen Antti
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/26/2001 07:21, John M. Clement
Re: "all accelerations are 9.8m/s^2"
,
01/26/2001 07:43, John M. Clement
Re: weightless in orbit
,
01/26/2001 07:51, John Denker
Re: weightless in orbit
,
01/26/2001 08:20, Savinainen Antti
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 08:38, David Bowman
Re: accerelation due to gravity
,
01/26/2001 08:48, Jim Ealy
Re: "all accelerations are 9.8m/s^2"
,
01/26/2001 08:48, John Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 08:59, John Mallinckrodt
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 09:21, Michael Edmiston
Re: "g, weight, orbital motion"
,
01/26/2001 09:30, Rick Tarara
Re: accerelation due to gravity
,
01/26/2001 09:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/26/2001 10:37, Moore, David
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 10:47, Joel Rauber
Re: Questions in the Classroom
,
01/26/2001 11:26, Tim O'Donnell
E field near charged disk
,
01/26/2001 11:29, Eugene Mosca
Re: weightless in orbit
,
01/26/2001 11:39, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/26/2001 11:40, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 11:56, David Bowman
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 12:02, Jim Green
Re: Questions in the Classroom
,
01/26/2001 12:09, SSHS KPHOX
Re: E field near charged disk
,
01/26/2001 12:14, John S. Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 12:24, Hugh Haskell
Re: acceleration contributed by gravity
,
01/26/2001 12:26, John S. Denker
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/26/2001 12:30, Zach Wolff
Re: E field near charged disk
,
01/26/2001 12:34, Hasan Fakhruddin
Questions in the Classroom
,
01/26/2001 12:46, Carl C. Gaither
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 12:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Questions in the Classroom
,
01/26/2001 13:29, Hugh Haskell
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (high school)
,
01/26/2001 14:48, Michael Edmiston
Re: "equals" versus "is"
,
01/26/2001 15:13, Jack Uretsky
interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 15:29, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 15:42, Kilmer, Skip
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 15:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 16:06, Rondo JEFFERY
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 16:16, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 16:19, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 16:22, John S. Denker
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 16:40, Rondo JEFFERY
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 16:41, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: "equals" versus "is"
,
01/26/2001 16:58, John S. Denker
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 17:14, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Questions in the Classroom
,
01/26/2001 17:15, cliff parker
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 17:26, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 17:40, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 18:08, Hugh Haskell
Re: E field near charged disk
,
01/26/2001 18:09, Eugene Mosca
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/26/2001 18:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/26/2001 18:15, SSHS KPHOX
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (rhetorical?)
,
01/26/2001 18:23, Michael Edmiston
Re: problems with classical physics
,
01/26/2001 18:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: equivalence principle for almost homogeneous fields
,
01/26/2001 20:01, John S. Denker
A new sequence? (was Acceleration due to gravity)
,
01/26/2001 20:20, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/26/2001 20:53, Glenn Knapp
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (rhetorical?)
,
01/26/2001 21:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (rhetorical?)
,
01/27/2001 08:52, David Bowman
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/27/2001 11:52, SSHS KPHOX
Physics teaching reform was "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/27/2001 13:34, John M. Clement
Re: can we say "g"?
,
01/27/2001 14:36, Larry Woolf
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/27/2001 17:20, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: interesting pic for a classroom exercise?
,
01/27/2001 17:33, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (high school)
,
01/27/2001 18:56, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
summer courses at ASU for physics teachers
,
01/27/2001 19:02, Jane Jackson
Re: Physics teaching reform was "acceleration due to gravity"
,
01/27/2001 21:32, John Denker
Re: satellite clock gravitometer
,
01/27/2001 21:56, John Denker
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (high school)
,
01/28/2001 02:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: satellite clock gravitometer
,
01/28/2001 02:33, Leigh Palmer
Re: satellite clock gravitometer
,
01/28/2001 09:53, Chuck Britton
Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 10:32, David Abineri
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 11:25, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 12:09, John Denker
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 12:26, SSHS KPHOX
Re: satellite clock gravitometer
,
01/28/2001 12:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 13:42, Leigh Palmer
Gravimeter experiment
,
01/28/2001 13:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 16:39, John M. Clement
Re: summer courses at ASU for physics teachers
,
01/28/2001 17:03, cliff parker
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 18:29, Curtis Meisenheimer
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 19:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 22:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Speed of Waves
,
01/28/2001 22:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (high school)
,
01/29/2001 10:41, Joel Rauber
PHYSICS Application
,
01/29/2001 10:47, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (high school)
,
01/29/2001 11:23, Eric T. Lane
Re: "acceleration due to gravity" (high school)
,
01/29/2001 12:01, Joel Rauber
Re: summer courses at ASU for physics teachers
,
01/29/2001 12:20, Jane Jackson
An interesting application of anti-static sheets
,
01/29/2001 13:55, George Goth
Re: An interesting application of anti-static sheets
,
01/29/2001 14:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: An interesting application of anti-static sheets
,
01/29/2001 14:39, Jerry Hester
Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 15:10, Ron Curtin
Re: Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 15:30, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 15:37, David Emigh
Re: Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 15:51, Paul O. Johnson
Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/29/2001 16:19, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/29/2001 16:24, David Emigh
Re: An interesting application of anti-static sheets
,
01/29/2001 16:24, Chuck Britton
puzzle: satellite clock crossover
,
01/29/2001 16:25, John Denker
Re: Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 16:41, Tore Ottinsen
Re: Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 17:00, Rondo JEFFERY
Re: Mass of Jupiter
,
01/29/2001 17:02, Leigh Palmer
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/29/2001 17:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: puzzle: satellite clock crossover
,
01/29/2001 17:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: puzzle: satellite clock crossover
,
01/29/2001 18:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/29/2001 19:39, David Bowman
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/29/2001 19:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: An interesting application of anti-static sheets
,
01/29/2001 22:51, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/29/2001 23:55, David Bowman
dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 00:02, Larry Smith
Super Capacitors
,
01/30/2001 00:29, Larry Smith
Re: Physics Test Writers
,
01/30/2001 05:16, Bob & Kathie Yeend
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 06:10, John Denker
Re: electrolytic capacitors
,
01/30/2001 06:56, John Denker
Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/30/2001 08:33, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/30/2001 09:09, David Bowman
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 09:34, Michael Edmiston
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/30/2001 10:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 12:19, Steven T. Ratliff
Physics Test Writers
,
01/30/2001 12:35, Philip Zell
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 12:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/30/2001 12:53, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Physics Test Writers
,
01/30/2001 13:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: N/kg versus m/s^2
,
01/30/2001 13:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: joules versus newton.meters
,
01/30/2001 14:17, John S. Denker
Momentum
,
01/30/2001 14:29, Harry Hightower
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 14:42, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 14:46, James S. Marsh
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 14:49, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 14:54, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 14:56, James S. Marsh
ghost crystal problem
,
01/30/2001 15:16, Kim S. Palermo
Re: joules versus newton.meters
,
01/30/2001 15:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: ghost crystal problem
,
01/30/2001 15:44, William Beaty
Re: joules versus newton.meters
,
01/30/2001 16:30, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 16:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: ghost crystal problem
,
01/30/2001 16:37, Leigh Palmer
GAUSS LAW
,
01/30/2001 16:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 16:48, Larry Cartwright
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/30/2001 16:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Momentum
,
01/30/2001 16:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/30/2001 17:23, John S. Denker
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/30/2001 17:35, Jim Green
Re: ghost crystal problem
,
01/30/2001 19:35, Glenn Knapp
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 19:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/30/2001 20:52, Wolfgang Rueckner
heat is not a noun
,
01/30/2001 21:42, Larry Smith
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/30/2001 22:18, SSHS KPHOX
Are EM fields "real," or are they abstract concepts?
,
01/30/2001 23:58, William Beaty
Re: ghost crystal problem
,
01/31/2001 01:07, Greg Darakjian
Re: Are EM fields "real," or are they abstract concepts?
,
01/31/2001 01:49, Zach Wolff
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/31/2001 02:03, Jim Green
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/31/2001 04:24, Michael Bowen
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/31/2001 07:09, John Denker
Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 07:51, J. Manor
Re: Are EM fields "real," or are they abstract concepts?
,
01/31/2001 08:18, Mark Sylvester
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 08:57, Tom McCarthy
Re: Momentum
,
01/31/2001 09:34, William J. Larson
mapping out equipotentials
,
01/31/2001 09:48, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Gauss' Law
,
01/31/2001 10:02, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/31/2001 10:06, Joel Rauber
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 30 Jan 2001 to 31 Jan 2001 (#2001-44)
,
01/31/2001 10:11, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: dielectric constant
,
01/31/2001 10:12, Joel Rauber
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 10:27, Thomas O'Neill
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 10:30, Rick Strickert
Re: mapping out equipotentials
,
01/31/2001 10:30, John Denker
Re: mapping out equipotentials
,
01/31/2001 10:33, Roger Haar
Re: mapping out equipotentials
,
01/31/2001 10:55, David Bowman
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 11:06, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Gauss' Law
,
01/31/2001 11:13, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 11:15, SSHS KPHOX
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 11:41, Chuck Britton
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/31/2001 12:14, Tim O'Donnell
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/31/2001 12:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/31/2001 13:02, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: electrolytic capacitors
,
01/31/2001 13:38, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/31/2001 14:07, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/31/2001 14:14, Leigh Palmer
Apparatus Competition this summer in Rochester!
,
01/31/2001 14:38, Mike Moloney
Re: dielectric constant and measuring capacitance
,
01/31/2001 14:39, Michael Bowen
Summer Workshop in Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy
,
01/31/2001 14:40, Andrew Post Zwicker
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 15:09, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 15:24, Larry Woolf
Re: Capillary tubes
,
01/31/2001 15:32, Larry Woolf
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 15:33, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: mapping out equipotentials
,
01/31/2001 15:40, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/31/2001 15:43, Chuck Britton
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 15:45, Chuck Britton
How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 16:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Are EM fields "real," or are they abstract concepts?
,
01/31/2001 16:09, William Beaty
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 16:14, Richard Bowman
Re: GAUSS LAW
,
01/31/2001 16:15, Bob Sciamanda
Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 16:21, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: word6 reformatting LFs
,
01/31/2001 16:23, John Denker
Re: Are EM fields "real," or are they abstract concepts?
,
01/31/2001 16:24, Bob Sciamanda
Re: dielectric constant and measuring capacitance
,
01/31/2001 16:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 16:50, Joseph Bellina
heat is "real", but...
,
01/31/2001 16:51, William Beaty
Re: Astronomical Unit (AU)
,
01/31/2001 16:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 16:56, John Denker
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 16:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 16:58, Chuck Britton
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 17:00, William Beaty
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 17:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 17:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 17:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 17:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 17:45, THOMAS SANDIN
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 18:05, Larry Smith
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 18:13, David Bowman
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 18:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
01/31/2001 18:33, Larry Woolf
Re: word6 reformatting LFs
,
01/31/2001 18:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 18:39, Mark Larchez
Re: heat is not a noun and GAUSS LAW
,
01/31/2001 18:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 18:59, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Are EM fields "real," or are they abstract concepts?
,
01/31/2001 19:12, Fabián Barba
Re: How to do it in word6?
,
01/31/2001 19:20, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 19:48, Michael Edmiston
Re: heat, a nonconserved quantity
,
01/31/2001 20:03, John Denker
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 20:12, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 20:15, John Denker
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 20:15, Bob Sciamanda
Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 20:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 20:26, William Beaty
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 20:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: Momentum Demo
,
01/31/2001 21:09, Scott and Suzanne Rippetoe
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
01/31/2001 21:22, William Beaty
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 21:32, William Beaty
Re: heat is not a noun
,
01/31/2001 21:39, William Beaty
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 22:09, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 22:54, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
01/31/2001 23:09, William Beaty
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
02/01/2001 00:09, William Beaty
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
02/01/2001 00:55, Jim Green
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
02/01/2001 00:58, Larry Woolf
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
02/01/2001 00:59, William Beaty
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
02/01/2001 01:29, William Beaty
Re: heat is "real", but...
,
02/01/2001 01:32, William Beaty
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
02/01/2001 01:35, John Denker
Re: Electrostatic shielding
,
02/01/2001 01:56, Bob Sciamanda
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc