Re: EM Radiation Without a Source

[brian whatcott <inet@INTELLISYS.NET>]

Seems that George agrees with me then: that after TBB there
was a mechanism for EM wave production that was not immediately
traceable to charge acceleration...

 I placed the suggestion in tentative terms because an excited
 species still provides the 'Source' which the subject
header would rather do without.

Brian Whatcott

At 08:01 11/30/00 -0500, you wrote:

> Sodium and Chlorine would not have been available -  Big Bang made hydrogen,
> helium, and not much else.  Production of sodium and chlorine takes place in
> stars or during supernovae.
>
> ******************************************************
> "Physics is not difficult; it's just weird."
>
>         - Vincent Icke, "The Force of Symmetry"
> ******************************************************
> George Spagna
> Department of Physics
> Randolph-Macon College
> P.O. Box 5005
> Ashland, VA 23005-5505
> phone: (804) 752-7344     FAX (804) 752-4724
> e-mail: gspagna@rmc.edu
> http://www.rmc.edu/~gspagna/
>
> Brian Whatcott writes:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: brian whatcott [mailto:inet@INTELLISYS.NET]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 7:56 AM
>
>
> > Off the top, a salty suggestion from after TBB (the big bang)
> > 11Na24 and 17Cl34 isomeric transitions with gamma radiation
> > from metastable excited nuclei.......(?)
brian whatcott <inet@intellisys.net>  Altus OK
                Eureka!