Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of October, 2000
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
raw egg vs boiled egg
,
09/27/2000 02:11, Jayasanker_J
Re: rotating space station - graphical analysis
,
10/01/2000 13:41, Ken Caviness
Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/01/2000 20:48, cliff parker
Lycopodium Powder
,
10/01/2000 21:16, cliff parker
Re: The Olympics
,
10/01/2000 22:42, Doug Craigen
Re: The Olympics
,
10/02/2000 01:19, Mark Sylvester
Re: Lycopodium Powder
,
10/02/2000 06:59, Chuck Britton
Re: Lycopodium Powder
,
10/02/2000 07:50, cliff parker
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/02/2000 08:43, Joel Rauber
Re: Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/02/2000 10:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/02/2000 10:04, Taha Mzoughi
Re: raw egg vs boiled egg
,
10/02/2000 10:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Fuel efficiency
,
10/02/2000 10:38, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Error in Space Cowboys
,
10/02/2000 11:16, Laurent Hodges
Re: Error in Space Cowboys
,
10/02/2000 11:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Fuel efficiency
,
10/02/2000 11:31, Rick Tarara
Re: Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/02/2000 11:53, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Fuel efficiency
,
10/02/2000 11:59, Shapiro, Mark
Harvard Case Histories
,
10/02/2000 13:55, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: A language issue (comment)
,
10/02/2000 14:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/02/2000 15:01, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: The Olympics, egg drop
,
10/02/2000 15:56, S.Goelzer
Re: A language issue (comment)
,
10/02/2000 15:57, Mark Sylvester
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/02/2000 16:39, Joel Rauber
Re: The Olympics, egg drop
,
10/02/2000 18:39, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Lycopodium Powder
,
10/03/2000 01:11, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
U-HS Partnerships workshop at AAPT meeting
,
10/03/2000 02:24, Jane Jackson
Re: That and which (Was : Re: A language issue (comment))
,
10/03/2000 03:39, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 04:22, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/03/2000 08:12, S.Goelzer
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 2 Oct 2000 to 3 Oct 2000 (#2000-347)
,
10/03/2000 08:20, S.Goelzer
Re: Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/03/2000 09:23, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 10:48, Doug Craigen
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 11:08, Doug Craigen
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/03/2000 11:58, Joel Rauber
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 14:22, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/03/2000 16:32, Doug Craigen
Re: Concerned about grades (shortish)
,
10/03/2000 17:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: Lycopodium Powder
,
10/03/2000 18:18, Jamil Ahmad
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 18:59, Lisa Gardner
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 19:22, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/03/2000 20:05, Spagna Jr., George
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 2 Oct 2000 to 3 Oct 2000 (#2000-347)
,
10/03/2000 23:44, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Cat's eyes
,
10/04/2000 00:13, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Read under water (was Cat's eyes)
,
10/04/2000 00:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Read under water (was Cat's eyes)
,
10/04/2000 01:36, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Concerned about grades (shortish)
,
10/04/2000 08:52, Joel Rauber
grades (unsubstantiated opinion)
,
10/04/2000 11:40, Joel Rauber
CBLs
,
10/04/2000 12:09, John Barrer
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/04/2000 13:08, Doug Craigen
Re: The Olympics, egg drop
,
10/04/2000 13:09, S.Goelzer
Re: Physics of Toys in Space
,
10/04/2000 13:13, S.Goelzer
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/04/2000 17:26, Mike Ugawa
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/04/2000 19:02, Lisa Gardner
Re: The Olympics, egg drop
,
10/04/2000 22:05, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/04/2000 22:23, John M. Clement
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/04/2000 22:42, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/05/2000 07:02, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/05/2000 07:19, Ed and Laura Eckel
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/05/2000 08:16, brian whatcott
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 16:02, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Fuel efficiency
,
10/05/2000 16:21, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 17:06, Michael Edmiston
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/05/2000 17:17, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Concerned about grades (not really physics anymore)
,
10/05/2000 18:04, Marc Kossover
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 18:25, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/05/2000 18:28, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 19:20, Robert Carlson
Re: Fuel efficiency
,
10/05/2000 19:27, NEIL D ADAMS
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 20:12, Rick Tarara
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/05/2000 20:22, Mike Ugawa
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 20:43, Michael Edmiston
AAPT Update 2000 Number 7 (fwd)
,
10/05/2000 20:57, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Concerned about grades
,
10/05/2000 21:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/05/2000 21:33, Robert Carlson
Grades: General thoughts
,
10/06/2000 00:24, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Grades: General thoughts
,
10/06/2000 06:39, Lisa Gardner
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/06/2000 08:19, Tim Burgess
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/06/2000 08:35, Wes Davis
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/06/2000 09:24, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/06/2000 10:11, Michael Edmiston
The drag force
,
10/06/2000 10:32, Justin Parke
Life is unfair.
,
10/06/2000 10:34, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Grades: General thoughts (an error of fact)
,
10/06/2000 11:20, Joel Rauber
Academic ability?
,
10/06/2000 11:22, Joel Rauber
Re: Life is unfair.
,
10/06/2000 11:32, Doug Craigen
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/06/2000 11:36, Doug Craigen
Re: Concerned About Grades (longish-er)
,
10/06/2000 11:50, Joel Rauber
Re: Concerned About Grades (criteria based grading)
,
10/06/2000 11:59, Joel Rauber
Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/06/2000 12:12, Laurent Hodges
Re: Concerned about grades (longish)
,
10/06/2000 12:17, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/06/2000 12:24, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/06/2000 13:23, brian whatcott
Re: Concerned About Grades
,
10/06/2000 13:58, Robert A Cohen
Re: Concerned About Grades (longish-er)
,
10/06/2000 14:00, Robert A Cohen
Re: Concerned About Grades (longish-er)
,
10/06/2000 14:55, Joel Rauber
Re: Concerned About Grades (longish-er)
,
10/06/2000 15:24, Robert A Cohen
Re: Grades: General thoughts
,
10/06/2000 16:51, Doug Craigen
Re: Academic ability?
,
10/06/2000 16:59, Tim Burgess
Monthly Technical Posting for PHYS-L
,
10/06/2000 17:05, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Glenn Commission Report: Before It's Too Late (intro)
,
10/06/2000 17:40, Jane Jackson
Re: Fuel efficiency
,
10/06/2000 19:55, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Creationism
,
10/06/2000 20:20, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/06/2000 23:31, Larry Cartwright
The drag force -- a correction
,
10/07/2000 09:32, Justin Parke
Re: The drag force
,
10/07/2000 10:59, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force -- a correction
,
10/07/2000 12:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/07/2000 12:43, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 13:06, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 13:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 15:44, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 16:03, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 16:26, John Mallinckrodt
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 16:28, David Bowman
Re: Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/07/2000 19:01, Rick Tarara
Re: The drag force -- a correction cubed
,
10/07/2000 19:21, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 19:32, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 20:40, Ludwik Kowalski
HTML tags
,
10/07/2000 21:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 21:24, Brian McInnes
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 21:33, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force
,
10/07/2000 22:41, brian whatcott
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/07/2000 22:47, Justin Parke
Re: Fuel efficiency versus speed
,
10/07/2000 23:02, brian whatcott
Re: HTML tags
,
10/07/2000 23:17, Derek Chirnside
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/08/2000 00:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/08/2000 00:42, Brian McInnes
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/08/2000 01:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: HTML tags
,
10/08/2000 01:54, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Glenn Commission Report: Before It's Too Late (Goal 1)
,
10/08/2000 02:22, Jane Jackson
CAUSALITY IN PHYSICS (was drag force)
,
10/08/2000 09:24, Ludwik Kowalski
PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/08/2000 09:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/08/2000 10:27, Rick Tarara
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/08/2000 10:38, Derek Chirnside
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/08/2000 12:27, Justin Parke
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/08/2000 14:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/08/2000 14:38, Robert Muir
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/08/2000 20:08, Rick Tarara
Newton's laws: foundations of mechanics
,
10/09/2000 01:06, Jane Jackson
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 02:09, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: CAUSALITY IN PHYSICS (was drag force)
,
10/09/2000 02:16, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: The drag force -- a correction squared
,
10/09/2000 02:20, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Space elevators
,
10/09/2000 09:15, Rick Strickert
Re: Space elevators
,
10/09/2000 10:45, brian whatcott
Re: Space elevators
,
10/09/2000 11:02, Rick Tarara
paper on teaching calculus
,
10/09/2000 12:03, Jack Uretsky
Re: Academic ability?
,
10/09/2000 12:08, Joel Rauber
Request for help from Brazillian colleague
,
10/09/2000 12:40, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Space elevators
,
10/09/2000 13:02, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: paper on teaching calculus
,
10/09/2000 13:37, brian whatcott
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 14:06, William Beaty
Re: paper on teaching calculus
,
10/09/2000 14:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 15:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 15:30, Tim O'Donnell
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 15:45, Spagna Jr., George
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 15:51, Tim O'Donnell
Re: Space elevators
,
10/09/2000 15:54, Eric T. Lane
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 16:20, Rick Tarara
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 16:30, Spagna Jr., George
Re: CAUSALITY IN PHYSICS (was drag force)
,
10/09/2000 17:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 20:22, Robert Carlson
Re: CAUSALITY IN PHYSICS (was drag force)
,
10/09/2000 21:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/09/2000 23:52, Doug Craigen
systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 01:18, William J. Larson
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/10/2000 03:09, Derek Chirnside
Re: PHYS_L COURTESY
,
10/10/2000 06:15, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Space elevators
,
10/10/2000 10:06, Tom Ford
Re: CAUSALITY IN PHYSICS (was drag force)
,
10/10/2000 10:55, Bob Sciamanda
HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/10/2000 11:25, Doug Craigen
Rate in progress (was PHYS_L COURTESY)
,
10/10/2000 11:40, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 11:46, Jack Uretsky
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 12:19, John Denker
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 12:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/10/2000 13:06, John Denker
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 13:07, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 13:16, Miguel A. Santos
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 13:18, Miguel A. Santos
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 13:28, Tim O'Donnell
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 13:41, Rick Tarara
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 14:14, Michael Edmiston
Re: Space elevators
,
10/10/2000 14:30, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/10/2000 14:35, Maurice Barnhill
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 14:52, E. Leonard Jossem
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/10/2000 15:21, Tim O'Donnell
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/10/2000 15:36, Leigh Palmer
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/10/2000 15:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 15:58, John Cooper
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/10/2000 16:14, Maurice Barnhill
Van de Graaf Generator
,
10/10/2000 16:15, Tom McCarthy
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 16:18, Chuck Britton
Re: Van de Graaf Generator
,
10/10/2000 16:31, Spagna Jr., George
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/10/2000 16:40, Joel Rauber
Test of tags
,
10/10/2000 16:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Van de Graaf Generator
,
10/10/2000 16:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 17:00, John S. Denker
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 17:19, David T. Marx
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 17:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: Van de Graaf Generator
,
10/10/2000 17:41, William Beaty
Re: Test of tags
,
10/10/2000 17:56, Doug Craigen
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 18:11, Mel Bartels
Re: Van de Graaf Generator
,
10/10/2000 18:47, William Beaty
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 18:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/10/2000 19:58, Mel Bartels
Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/10/2000 21:45, cliff parker
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/10/2000 23:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/10/2000 23:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/10/2000 23:59, brian whatcott
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 00:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 00:42, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: U-HS Partnerships workshop at AAPT meeting
,
10/11/2000 02:24, Jane Jackson
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 03:44, Derek Chirnside
Re: test of tags
,
10/11/2000 03:46, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 04:18, Derek Chirnside
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 04:23, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 04:41, D.V.N.Sarma
HTML tags
,
10/11/2000 05:54, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/11/2000 07:46, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: systematic error and statistical error
,
10/11/2000 08:45, Miguel A. Santos
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 09:06, Jim Ealy
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 09:48, James Mackey
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 10:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 10:24, Doug Craigen
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 10:38, Doug Craigen
clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 10:53, Mike Smith
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 11:36, John Mallinckrodt
Brass trumpets, etc.
,
10/11/2000 12:16, Jim Diamond
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 12:24, SSHS KPHOX
Security and protocol: was( HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons)
,
10/11/2000 12:35, B. Esser
Re: Security and protocol: was( HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons)
,
10/11/2000 12:55, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Netscape mailer and HTML
,
10/11/2000 13:09, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 13:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 13:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 13:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: HTML, MUAs, and listservers
,
10/11/2000 14:05, John Denker
Re: Netscape mailer and HTML
,
10/11/2000 14:29, Doug Craigen
Kudos to Ludwik Kowalski
,
10/11/2000 14:36, Joel Rauber
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 14:51, Doug Craigen
Kudos to Herb Gottlieb (as well)
,
10/11/2000 14:55, Joel Rauber
Re: Netscape mailer and HTML
,
10/11/2000 15:29, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 15:40, Gary Karshner
Re: measure what you care about
,
10/11/2000 15:42, John Denker
violins; was Re: clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 15:45, Mike Smith
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 16:08, Doug Craigen
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 16:20, Doug Craigen
Re: violins; was Re: clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 16:24, Joseph Bellina
Re: clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 16:27, Mel Bartels
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 16:42, Rick Tarara
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 19:29, Doug Craigen
Re: HTML Mail for PHYS-L: Pros/Cons
,
10/11/2000 19:35, Doug Craigen
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 19:43, Doug Craigen
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 20:00, cliff parker
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 20:53, Rick Tarara
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 21:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/11/2000 21:21, Scott Goelzer
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 22:30, brian whatcott
Re: Test of tags
,
10/11/2000 22:41, Doug Craigen
Re: Netscape mailer and HTML
,
10/11/2000 23:40, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Netscape mailer and HTML
,
10/11/2000 23:51, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/11/2000 23:58, Leigh Palmer
Glenn Commission Report: Before It's Too Late (Goal 2)
,
10/12/2000 01:53, Jane Jackson
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 06:06, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: (d/dt) ACCELERATION
,
10/12/2000 06:22, David Bowman
Re: Test of tags
,
10/12/2000 08:23, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Test of tags
,
10/12/2000 09:08, Rick Tarara
Electrinos?
,
10/12/2000 09:44, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 09:57, Leigh Palmer
One last Test of tags
,
10/12/2000 10:10, Rick Tarara
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 10:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrinos?
,
10/12/2000 10:39, Chuck Britton
Re: (d/dt) ACCELERATION
,
10/12/2000 11:15, John Denker
Re: One last Test of tags
,
10/12/2000 11:19, Andy Dougherty
Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 11:19, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Electrinos?
,
10/12/2000 11:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: violins; was Re: clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/12/2000 11:42, Jim Goff
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 11:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: One last Test of tags
,
10/12/2000 11:53, Ludwik Kowalski
To Receive HTML from PHYS-L
,
10/12/2000 12:07, Rick Tarara
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 12:11, Andy Dougherty
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 12:20, Jim Green
Re: Test of tags
,
10/12/2000 12:21, Doug Craigen
Clausius
,
10/12/2000 12:28, Jim Green
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 12:43, brian whatcott
HTML Instructions (Re: One last Test of tags)
,
10/12/2000 12:46, Doug Craigen
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 12:54, Doug Craigen
Re: Test of tags--DIGEST
,
10/12/2000 12:55, Rick Tarara
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 12:58, brian whatcott
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 13:01, Doug Craigen
Re: (d/dt) ACCELERATION
,
10/12/2000 13:01, David Bowman
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 13:04, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: (d/dt) ACCELERATION
,
10/12/2000 13:13, William Beaty
Re: Clausius
,
10/12/2000 13:13, John Denker
Re: Clausius
,
10/12/2000 13:13, brian whatcott
Re: Clausius
,
10/12/2000 13:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: HTML Instructions (Re: One last Test of tags)
,
10/12/2000 13:25, Andy Dougherty
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 13:46, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 13:52, Andy Dougherty
Re: HTML Instructions (Re: One last Test of tags)
,
10/12/2000 14:08, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 14:15, Joel Rauber
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 14:33, Doug Craigen
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 14:54, Andy Dougherty
Re: Test Equation
,
10/12/2000 14:56, Andy Dougherty
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 15:44, crawford j maccallum
Kudos to Thomas Walkiewicz
,
10/12/2000 15:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Nobel prizes (was: Electrinos?)
,
10/12/2000 17:24, Roger Freedman
Re: Clausius
,
10/12/2000 17:56, Jim Green
Re: Fish tank in orbit?
,
10/12/2000 19:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Physics Software
,
10/12/2000 19:24, A Elizondo
Re: Physics Software
,
10/12/2000 21:51, frank cange
Re: Clausius
,
10/12/2000 22:39, brian whatcott
Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/13/2000 12:42, Tony Wayne
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/13/2000 13:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/13/2000 15:19, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!)
,
10/13/2000 15:46, Richard Hake
Re: The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!)
,
10/13/2000 17:25, John M. Clement
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 09:55, John M. Clement
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 11:51, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 15:38, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 15:55, John M. Clement
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 17:12, John M. Clement
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 17:15, John Denker
Am I pushing your leg? (Was: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS)
,
10/14/2000 18:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Am I pushing your leg? (Was: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS)
,
10/14/2000 19:16, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 19:31, Brian McInnes
Re: Am I pushing your leg? (Was: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS)
,
10/14/2000 19:45, Rick Tarara
Re: pushing vs. pulling
,
10/14/2000 19:50, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 19:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 20:21, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: F before ma?
,
10/14/2000 20:55, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 21:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Am I pushing your leg? (Was: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS)
,
10/14/2000 22:26, Derek Chirnside
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 22:47, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/14/2000 23:18, Rick Tarara
Re: pushing vs. pulling
,
10/15/2000 02:57, John Mallinckrodt
No subject was specified.
,
10/15/2000 05:06, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 07:26, Robert A Cohen
Software bookmarks
,
10/15/2000 11:06, Rick Tarara
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 11:10, Tom McDonald
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 11:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 11:52, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 12:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 12:10, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Bernard's Philosophical Reference.
,
10/15/2000 12:25, brian whatcott
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 12:46, John Denker
Re: definitions +- equations
,
10/15/2000 13:46, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 14:44, Robert Carlson
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 14:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 15:11, David Bowman
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 15:13, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 15:23, John M. Clement
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 16:08, Joel Rauber
Re: equivalence +- assignment
,
10/15/2000 16:12, John Denker
Re: pushing vs. pulling
,
10/15/2000 16:14, David Bowman
Re: The Benezet-Berman Experiment (not long questions)
,
10/15/2000 16:31, Joel Rauber
Re: equivalence +- assignment
,
10/15/2000 16:34, Joel Rauber
Re: equivalence +- assignment
,
10/15/2000 17:03, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 17:10, Robert Carlson
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 17:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: bullet holes
,
10/15/2000 17:37, John Denker
Re: bullet holes
,
10/15/2000 17:49, Robert Carlson
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 18:20, John Denker
Re: The Benezet-Berman Experiment (not long questions)
,
10/15/2000 18:37, John M. Clement
Re: The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!)
,
10/15/2000 19:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 20:11, Bob Sciamanda
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 20:43, Fabián Barba
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/15/2000 22:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 00:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: equivalence +- assignment
,
10/16/2000 00:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 03:07, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 03:27, Tucker Hiatt
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 04:06, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 08:48, Joel Rauber
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 10:08, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 10:37, Rick Tarara
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 10:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 11:04, John Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 12:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 12:11, Rick Strickert
Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 12:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 12:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: key concepts in physics ???
,
10/16/2000 12:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 12:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 13:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 13:25, Joel Rauber
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 13:30, Rick Strickert
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 13:35, Joel Rauber
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 13:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 13:48, Joel Rauber
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 14:12, Chuck Britton
Re: key concepts in physics ???
,
10/16/2000 14:23, Chuck Britton
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 14:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: key concepts in physics ???
,
10/16/2000 14:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: F before ma?
,
10/16/2000 14:48, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: F before ma?
,
10/16/2000 17:58, John S. Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 18:47, Brian McInnes
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 18:49, Robert A Cohen
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/16/2000 19:01, brian whatcott
Re: bullet holes
,
10/16/2000 19:05, John S. Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 19:36, John S. Denker
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 21:20, Leigh Palmer
Nonsense abbreviations
,
10/16/2000 21:47, Paul O. Johnson
Re: CAUSATION IN PHYSICS
,
10/16/2000 22:13, Brian McInnes
Re: blue sky: Bohren&Fraser +- Einstein
,
10/16/2000 22:51, John S. Denker
OT: Re: USPS nonsense
,
10/16/2000 23:27, John S. Denker
Re: OT: Re: USPS nonsense
,
10/17/2000 01:37, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/17/2000 01:56, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: key concepts in physics ???
,
10/17/2000 02:05, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Friction
,
10/17/2000 07:13, David Abineri
Re: Friction
,
10/17/2000 08:34, John Denker
Re: Friction
,
10/17/2000 09:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Friction
,
10/17/2000 11:04, Doug Craigen
near deadline reposting of job ad: director of laboratories at Kenyon College
,
10/17/2000 11:16, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: Friction
,
10/17/2000 12:28, John S. Denker
historical astronomy question
,
10/17/2000 16:42, Larry Smith
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/17/2000 17:38, Gary Karshner
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/17/2000 18:00, Rick Strickert
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/17/2000 18:05, Rondo JEFFERY
What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (was "The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!")
,
10/17/2000 19:13, Richard Hake
Re: Friction
,
10/17/2000 20:14, brian whatcott
Re: Third-hand astonishing quote
,
10/17/2000 20:48, Clarence Bennett
Re: key concepts in physics ???
,
10/17/2000 21:00, Chuck Britton
Re: historical astronomy question et al.
,
10/17/2000 21:13, Chuck Britton
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/17/2000 23:05, brian whatcott
Re: Friction (STATIC)
,
10/17/2000 23:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (was "The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!")
,
10/18/2000 00:59, Jerome Epstein
British Columbia Forestry Information
,
10/18/2000 04:40, Bruce Bressette
Re: Friction
,
10/18/2000 05:21, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Friction
,
10/18/2000 08:00, brian whatcott
Re: British Columbia Forestry Information
,
10/18/2000 08:33, Tom Ford
Re: Friction (STATIC)
,
10/18/2000 08:50, Chuck Britton
Re: British Columbia Forestry Information
,
10/18/2000 09:00, Paul O. Johnson
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 17 Oct 2000 to 18 Oct 2000 (#2000-374)
,
10/18/2000 09:44, Promod R. Pratap
Re: Friction
,
10/18/2000 10:23, John Denker
Re: friction
,
10/18/2000 10:26, Rick Tarara
Re: friction (STATIC)
,
10/18/2000 10:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Friction
,
10/18/2000 10:30, Doug Craigen
Re: Friction (STATIC)
,
10/18/2000 10:33, John Denker
Re: British Columbia Forestry Information
,
10/18/2000 10:44, Doug Craigen
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/18/2000 10:57, Rick Strickert
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)
,
10/18/2000 11:06, Joel Rauber
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)
,
10/18/2000 11:21, Rick Tarara
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)
,
10/18/2000 11:37, Joel Rauber
Re: Friction
,
10/18/2000 11:40, John Denker
Re: Friction
,
10/18/2000 12:19, John Denker
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)
,
10/18/2000 12:32, Tim O'Donnell
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/18/2000 13:13, Eric T. Lane
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/18/2000 14:17, James McLean
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/18/2000 15:01, Leigh Palmer
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/18/2000 15:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: friction (STATIC)
,
10/18/2000 16:04, Ludwik Kowalski
TIMSS (etc)
,
10/18/2000 16:07, John Barrer
squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 16:13, Mark Sylvester
Request for 2-year-college physics web pages
,
10/18/2000 16:18, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/18/2000 16:33, Rick Strickert
Re: squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 16:37, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 17:30, Doug Craigen
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (was "The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!")
,
10/18/2000 18:22, Jack Uretsky
sharing a test answer
,
10/18/2000 19:40, Larry Smith
Re: squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 20:38, Yifan Yu
Re: squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 21:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 21:49, brian whatcott
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)(dependent learners?)
,
10/18/2000 22:23, Andrew Njaa
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (was "The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!")
,
10/18/2000 22:32, Waggoner, Bill
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)(dependent learners?)
,
10/18/2000 22:49, Rick Tarara
Re: squash ball question
,
10/18/2000 23:21, cliff parker
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/19/2000 00:52, Jim Green
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 03:32, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: clarinets; was Re: Brass Instruments
,
10/19/2000 04:06, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 08:48, Mark Sylvester
rubber
,
10/19/2000 10:15, Chuck Britton
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 11:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 11:19, Mark Sylvester
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/19/2000 11:27, Rick Strickert
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (was "The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!")
,
10/19/2000 12:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 12:48, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 13:08, brian whatcott
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 13:37, Mark Sylvester
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/19/2000 14:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 15:33, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/19/2000 15:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/19/2000 16:16, John Denker
summary: causation in physics
,
10/19/2000 16:37, John Denker
Re: summary: causation in physics
,
10/19/2000 17:30, David Bowman
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 17:41, Mark Sylvester
Forward from Jerry Epstein on "What Does TIMSS Teach Us?"
,
10/19/2000 17:53, Richard Hake
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 18:21, Karl Trappe
Re: summary: causation in physics
,
10/19/2000 18:27, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 19:57, brian whatcott
Re: Friction
,
10/19/2000 20:52, Doug Craigen
Re: summary: causation in physics
,
10/19/2000 22:50, Brian McInnes
Re: squash ball question
,
10/19/2000 23:16, Paul O. Johnson
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/19/2000 23:49, Larry Smith
Re: squash ball question
,
10/20/2000 00:18, SSHS KPHOX
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/20/2000 01:04, Leigh Palmer
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/20/2000 01:20, Larry Smith
What is wring here?
,
10/20/2000 02:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/20/2000 02:53, David Bowman
Re: What is wring here?
,
10/20/2000 04:26, Brian McInnes
Re: What is wring here?
,
10/20/2000 05:44, David Bowman
Re: What is wring here?
,
10/20/2000 05:56, David Bowman
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)(dependent learners?)
,
10/20/2000 06:15, Andrew Njaa
Re: summary: causation in physics
,
10/20/2000 07:48, John Denker
Cause and Effect
,
10/20/2000 09:08, Rick Tarara
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/20/2000 09:17, Joseph Bellina
Re: What is wrong here?
,
10/20/2000 09:20, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/20/2000 09:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/20/2000 10:49, David Bowman
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/20/2000 11:02, Joel Rauber
Thoughts on causation
,
10/20/2000 11:20, Joel Rauber
Re: squash ball question
,
10/20/2000 11:26, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: squash ball question
,
10/20/2000 11:32, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: historical astronomy question
,
10/20/2000 11:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/20/2000 12:16, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Sic transit
,
10/20/2000 12:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/20/2000 13:28, Rondo JEFFERY
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/20/2000 13:38, Joel Rauber
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (dependent learners?)
,
10/20/2000 13:41, Jane Jackson
Glenn Commission Report: Before It's Too Late (Goal 3)
,
10/20/2000 15:22, Jane Jackson
AD: Two T-T physics positions at NKU
,
10/20/2000 15:47, Ray Enzweiler
Re: Friction
,
10/20/2000 17:35, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/20/2000 18:39, Brian McInnes
Re: Sic transit
,
10/20/2000 20:19, brian whatcott
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (was"The Benezet-Berman Experiment (LONG!")
,
10/21/2000 10:57, John M. Clement
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? (Short)
,
10/21/2000 11:03, John M. Clement
Re: sharing a test answer
,
10/21/2000 16:30, John M. Clement
Re: rubber
,
10/21/2000 17:37, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Sic transit
,
10/21/2000 18:09, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/21/2000 18:41, John Denker
Re: Causation
,
10/21/2000 20:42, J. Peter Vajk
Re: Calendars -- Gregorian and Julian
,
10/21/2000 20:59, J. Peter Vajk
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/21/2000 21:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Sic transit
,
10/21/2000 23:18, brian whatcott
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/22/2000 00:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 07:42, Robert A Cohen
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 11:56, brian whatcott
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 13:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 14:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sic transit
,
10/22/2000 14:54, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 16:49, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 18:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 19:29, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Sic transit
,
10/22/2000 19:31, brian whatcott
Re: contrived gravitational fields
,
10/22/2000 20:03, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/22/2000 20:42, brian whatcott
Can anyone solve this problem?
,
10/22/2000 23:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 01:03, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 01:16, Leigh Palmer
Re: Can anyone solve this problem?
,
10/23/2000 01:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: capacitance bridge problem
,
10/23/2000 02:32, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 02:48, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 03:09, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 03:23, Paolo Cavallo
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 04:07, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 04:34, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 05:39, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 09:16, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 09:39, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/23/2000 10:44, James McLean
Teaching Trends
,
10/23/2000 10:44, Dwight K. Souder
Re: Teaching Trends
,
10/23/2000 12:33, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: Thoughts on causation
,
10/23/2000 13:05, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Wave Intensity vs Energy
,
10/23/2000 13:17, James McLean
Friction
,
10/23/2000 14:05, E. Leonard Jossem
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 14:31, Jack Uretsky
Re: Can anyone solve this problem?
,
10/23/2000 15:26, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 15:43, Robert A Cohen
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 16:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 16:42, Rick Tarara
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 17:11, Robert A Cohen
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 17:17, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/23/2000 18:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: The Sarma-Denker construction (Formerly: Cause and Effect)
,
10/24/2000 00:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: contrived gravitational fields
,
10/24/2000 06:34, John Denker
various errata
,
10/24/2000 07:14, John Denker
Re: Can anyone solve this problem?
,
10/24/2000 08:18, brian whatcott
a query on standards
,
10/24/2000 10:58, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: form and function
,
10/24/2000 11:43, John Denker
Re: a query on standards
,
10/24/2000 12:29, Jack Uretsky
Re: a query on standards
,
10/24/2000 13:09, brian whatcott
Re: Friction
,
10/24/2000 13:51, S.Goelzer
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/24/2000 14:01, Robert A Cohen
Re: a query on standards
,
10/24/2000 14:19, Joel Rauber
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/24/2000 15:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: a query on standards
,
10/24/2000 16:09, Tom Ford
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/24/2000 18:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 00:07, brian whatcott
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 02:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Calendars -- Gregorian and Julian
,
10/25/2000 02:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Causation +- muscles
,
10/25/2000 07:50, John Denker
erratum: Causation +- muscles
,
10/25/2000 11:14, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 13:26, Robert A Cohen
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 14:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 15:39, Robert A Cohen
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 16:28, Leigh Palmer
Brain-based Learning ?
,
10/25/2000 17:53, Richard Hake
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 17:58, Rick Tarara
radioactivity
,
10/25/2000 21:41, cliff parker
Re: radioactivity
,
10/25/2000 22:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 22:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/25/2000 22:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: radioactivity
,
10/25/2000 22:39, John M. Clement
Manhattan
,
10/26/2000 00:15, Jim Green
Re: radioactivity
,
10/26/2000 01:22, John Denker
Re: radioactivity
,
10/26/2000 02:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: Manhattan
,
10/26/2000 08:21, brian whatcott
Re: radioactivity
,
10/26/2000 09:11, John Denker
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 10:45, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: radioactivity
,
10/26/2000 11:57, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Calendars -- Gregorian and Julian
,
10/26/2000 12:15, Jon Bell
Re: radioactivity
,
10/26/2000 12:44, Jerry Lisantti
CAUSE AND EFFECT
,
10/26/2000 12:51, James Espinosa
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 13:15, D.V.N.Sarma
Re: a query on standards
,
10/26/2000 13:19, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 13:33, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 13:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 14:12, Gary Karshner
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 14:18, Jim Green
Re: radioactivity
,
10/26/2000 15:05, Leigh Palmer
Re: Causation
,
10/26/2000 15:06, Glenn A. Carlson
"tape measure " home runs
,
10/26/2000 15:28, Dave Wiener
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 15:52, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 19:26, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/26/2000 19:44, Rick Tarara
Decision-Theoretic Foundations for Causal Reasoning
,
10/26/2000 20:02, John S. Denker
Re: "tape measure " home runs
,
10/26/2000 20:32, brian whatcott
Kenyan needs help with solar oven manufacture
,
10/26/2000 21:19, Jane Jackson
Re: Kenyan needs help with solar oven manufacture
,
10/26/2000 22:20, Jim Green
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/27/2000 09:27, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Kenyan needs help with solar oven manufacture
,
10/27/2000 09:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: "tape measure " home runs
,
10/27/2000 10:54, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/27/2000 12:15, Larry Smith
Re: jones' e-mail
,
10/27/2000 12:39, Jim Green
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/27/2000 12:45, Jim Green
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/27/2000 12:58, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/27/2000 13:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: radioactivity
,
10/27/2000 16:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: radioactivity
,
10/27/2000 16:53, Doug Craigen
Re: radioactivity
,
10/27/2000 17:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: radioactivity
,
10/27/2000 17:50, cliff parker
Re: radioactivity
,
10/27/2000 18:24, cliff parker
why and how to think about cause-and-effect
,
10/27/2000 18:36, John Denker
Re: radioactivity
,
10/27/2000 19:09, John Denker
Re: What Does TIMSS Teach Us? Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/27/2000 21:10, Jane Jackson
QM Gordon Conference, algebra-based physics, news
,
10/28/2000 00:24, batcam
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/28/2000 03:00, brian whatcott
Definitions
,
10/28/2000 10:49, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Definitions
,
10/28/2000 11:47, Jim Green
Re: Definitions
,
10/28/2000 11:58, brian whatcott
Re: Definitions
,
10/28/2000 12:39, John Denker
Re: radioactivity (recantation-in part)
,
10/28/2000 12:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: stability vs damping; pitch vs AoA
,
10/28/2000 12:59, John Denker
Re: radioactivity
,
10/28/2000 14:50, cliff parker
Re: radioactivity
,
10/28/2000 15:51, John Denker
Re: why and how to think about cause-and-effect
,
10/28/2000 15:57, Mark Sylvester
Photograph
,
10/28/2000 16:49, Marc Kossover
Re: Cause and Effect
,
10/28/2000 19:09, brian whatcott
Re: Definitions
,
10/29/2000 00:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: Photograph
,
10/29/2000 06:33, John SOHL
Re: Photograph
,
10/29/2000 10:00, brian whatcott
Re: Photograph
,
10/29/2000 12:40, Hugh Haskell
Re: Definitions
,
10/29/2000 14:44, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Definitions
,
10/29/2000 15:24, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Photograph
,
10/29/2000 15:26, brian whatcott
[Re: radioactivity]
,
10/29/2000 20:32, cliff parker
Re: [Re: radioactivity]
,
10/29/2000 22:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Photograph
,
10/29/2000 22:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Re: radioactivity]
,
10/29/2000 23:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Re: radioactivity]
,
10/29/2000 23:19, Jack Uretsky
Re: Definitions
,
10/30/2000 00:25, Glenn A. Carlson
"surplusage"
,
10/30/2000 02:12, Tucker Hiatt
Re: dineutron
,
10/30/2000 08:53, John Denker
Re: "surplusage"
,
10/30/2000 09:44, Tom Ford
Re: [Re: radioactivity]
,
10/30/2000 10:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Re: radioactivity]
,
10/30/2000 10:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: generalized elephants
,
10/30/2000 11:08, John Denker
Re: [Re: radioactivity]
,
10/30/2000 12:06, Leigh Palmer
Eudora mood
,
10/30/2000 13:30, Leigh Palmer
Text on electrostatics?
,
10/30/2000 15:04, William Beaty
Re: Text on electrostatics?
,
10/30/2000 16:50, Brian McInnes
Re: "surplusage"
,
10/30/2000 17:25, cliff parker
Re: Eudora mood
,
10/30/2000 17:25, Hugh Haskell
Re: Eudora mood
,
10/30/2000 18:51, brian whatcott
Re: generalized elephants
,
10/31/2000 19:53, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: stability vs damping; pitch vs AoA
,
10/31/2000 22:48, brian whatcott
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc