Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
With a little manipulation,[snip]
I could easily convince myself there were only 2 forms which could not be
super-imposed. But this doesn't me closer to a definition for a similae
demonstration for *any* object.
One practical way to convince yourself that there is a one-to-one
correspondence between an object and its mirror image:
Suppose an object had two possible mirror images. Which image would
you see if you placed the object in front of a mirror?
I certainly agree with Glenn Carlson... an object has only one mirrorimage.
If the object's one mirror image can be rotated to a position that allows
the image to be superimposed on the object, then the object is not chiral
(not handed). If the object's one mirror image cannot be rotated to a
position that allows the image to be superimposed on the object, then the
object is chiral (handed).
If you have not done so, I urge you to place an object in front of amirror,
then construct a new object that looks identical to the mirror image of thevarious
first object. No matter how you orient the first object in front of the
mirror, you will always construct the same mirror-image object. Try
objects and see which are superimposable and which are not.