Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 10:17 AM -0700 5/8/00, Mark Sylvester wrote:
>At 10.52 07/05/00 -0700, Leigh Palmer wrote:
>
> >Well, if one wishes to call the ratio V/I the resistance of a light
> >bulb at a specific operating point one may certainly do so. It is a
> >matter of some concern to me that this resistance can't be used to
> >calculate anything else. It does not condense the information in a
> >way that will simplify a later calculation - operating voltage or
> >current must still be specified along with this resistance, so how
> >is that an improvement over specifying two other numbers, say
> >voltage and power?
>
>We do a lab where students measure I and V for a range of values, using a
>12V bulb. They calculate R at each point in order to find the temperature
>of the filament (and then go on to plot power vs temperature in pursuit of
>the 4th power radiation law). I don't think this is a counter-example to
>your comment, but it does show that the concept (of resistance) is useful
>even when limited in the sense that you point out.
You make my point; thank you. You have your students plot temperature
vs. power (I assume). If the student has measured I and V, can he not
calculate power without first calculating this questionable resistance
parameter? Of what value, then, is V/I?
On a related issue: do your students use an optical pyrometer to
measure the filament temperature? I think this instrument (which may
be a tad expensive) is a marvelous one to introduce students to, and
it fits well into the course when one is studying Stefan's law as
your students are doing...