Re: Geiger, not binomial ?

["Paul O. Johnson" <hodgepoj@YAHOO.COM>]

--- "John S. Denker" <jsd@MONMOUTH.COM> wrote:
> Be careful, there....
>
> I would have said nearly the opposite about Bevington.  I find it to
> be relatively accessible, but full of bugs.  The programs that
> Bevington presents:
>
>   a) Use an unsophisticated approach to the problem, and
>   b) Are full of amateurish bugs, e.g. endless loops.
>
> Much better programs are available from e.g. the _Numerical Recipes_
> book.

John, John, why do you present your solution in code? What "Numerical
Recipes book"?

Paul Johnson

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com