Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
SNIP Now I'm all in favor of more content but there are three
questions that I have with this: 1) this scenario leaves only 9 hrs
for ALL OTHER science and math courses (biology, geology, computers,
math beyond algebra). Shouldn't a middle school teacher have a
broader science background?;
2) it seems to me that a good 100 level
Hewitt based course is really the highest level a middle school
teacher should be teaching at. Should we teach teachers the same
stuff they themselves will be teaching or should we teach them at a
higher level than they will actually need?
3) We have good evidence
that the current requirements (the first semester of physics only)
drives students away from a physical science concentration. Are these
additional requirements going to further deplete the available
teachers in this area?
These opportunities to affect the future generation of teachers only
occurs once in a while and I want to do it well. Any advice on this
would be appreciated.
kyle
-----------------------------------------------------
kyle forinash 812-941-2390
kforinas@ius.edu
Natural Science Division
Indiana University Southeast
New Albany, IN 47150
http://Physics.ius.edu/
-----------------------------------------------------