Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Education

Jim:

All we expect is civility. There are a great many different viewpoints on
PHYS-L, as has been obvious from postings on this topic. Many subscribers
are interested in this subject and in influencing their elected representatives
on their decisions regarding the preparation and upgrading of gradeschool
science teachers.

I appreciate your viewpoint as refreshing myself, although I completely
disagree with it on Eisenhower funding. But hearing it reasoned out helps me
understand AZ state opponents to Eisenhower funding. Thank you for
sharing your opinion.

Dan M
Dan MacIsaac, Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Northern AZ Univ
danmac@nau.edu http://purcell.phy.nau.edu PHYS-L list owner

Does the list expect one to remain quiet in the face of all this drivel?

Jim Green

At 23:50 29 02 2000 , you wrote:
[forwarded message]
**********************
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000
From: Jodi Peterson <jodi_p@nsta.org>
Subject: NSTA Legislative Alert


NSTA Legislative Alert!!!
February 28, 2000

SENATE REAUTHORIZATION BILL RELEASED
YOUR CALLS NEEDED NOW!!

Senate Education Committee to Vote on S. 2 On WEDNESDAY, March 1

As anticipated, Senator Jim Jeffords (R-VT) has released S. 2, the
Educational Opportunities Act, the Senate bill to reauthorize the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act. As written, the bill **does not** include the
targeted support for professional development for science and math teacher
professional development in Title II.