Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
... . We often say that in any
short time interval the current in wire #1 is equal to the
current in wire #2. And some add "because charges must be
conserved". Here are some questions.
... . For example, I1=5*I2 and Q1=5*Q2. Would such
data be in conflict with the law of conservation of electric
charges? I do not think so.
Suppose a circuit is very simple, only one branch, a vacuum
capacitor C (parallel plates very close to each other) in
series with R. Plus two ammeters, one inserted into the wire
#1 and another inserted into the wire #2; the R*C is
conveniently long. An experiment shows that I1=I2, at any
moment. How can it be if there is no motion of charges in
the vacuum? The displacement current through C was invented
by Maxwell; is it real or imaginary?
Some say the displacement current is a mathematical
abstraction (extremely useful); it is not a real current.
What makes it less real than other abstractions, such as
"ohmic current" in a wire, or "water current" in a tube?
... . I don't think that the displacement
current is any less real than an "ohmic current". Among
other things it serves the function of preserving charge
conservation in the following sense. It preserves the
nature of current that there are no true sources or sinks
for electric current.
Between the plates of a charging
capacitor the current exists and flows along so that if you
integrate the source/sink density over some volume,
including the space between the plates, you always find
that the same amount of current is flowing into the volume
as is flowing out.