Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
... Since the Coulomb
repulsion would be expected to blow the nucleus apart, it was
obvious that there must be some other, much stronger force,
that was holding it together. It is stronger than the E-M force
by a factor of alpha (the fine structure constant), or 1/137;
I don't know who first called it the strong force. The weak force
is called weak because it *is* weak; on the same scale it has a
relative strength of about 10^(-13). (The strengths of the
interactions vary with energy, in general; these comparisons are
for interactions at zero energy. The weak force, in particular,
is much stronger at masses larger than the W and Z masses).
Sue Willis