Re: Computer Skills

["Steven T. Ratliff" <str@nwc.edu>]

I agree with Bob that both electronics and a computer 
programming class should be included in the physics curriculum.

The choice of a computer language is a difficult one.  I would argue 
for Fortran 90 (and Fortran 95 as compilers are available).  However, 
once you know one language, it is relatively easy to learn others.  

Regards,
Steven Ratliff


Bob Sciamanda wrote:
> Since I began teaching (in the 50's) I have argued for  basic
> electronics as a necessary ingredient of the physics curriculum,
> citing its ubiquity in the implementation of almost any modern
> experimental procedure.  In the same vain I would now insist on a
> familiarity with computer programming as an essential tool of our
> 20/21 century armamentarium. Give them a grounding in SOME (it 
> doesn't matter which) programming  - they can then branch out on 
> their own as prompted by interest and study / job requirements.  
> (Much more so than electronics, a student given a start in some 
> programming can then teach himself more sophisticated programming by 
> reading manuals.)

> As with electronics, computer implementation is a tool ; they need 
> not be experts in the nuts and bolts details.  In both cases, they 
> need mostly to understand what the technology will, and will not, do 
> and how to best exploit it as a means to the development of their 
> physics.

> Electronic hardware and computer software have become an expected
> extension of what it means to  measure and think quantitatively.




Steven T. Ratliff
Associate Professor of Physics
Northwestern College
3003 Snelling Av. N.
Saint Paul, MN  55113-1598

Internet:  stratliff@nwc.edu (or str@nwc.edu)