POLARIZATION

[LUDWIK KOWALSKI <KOWALSKIL@alpha.montclair.edu>]

> > If linear polarization can be described as a superposition of circular
> > polarization, and vice versa, how can one be more 'basic' than the other?

> Linear is more basic because it can be comprehended without "circular".

> And it is conceptually more simple.
   One-dimensional motion (of the tip of the vector) is more simple than 
   the two-dimensional motion.

3) According to our teaching tradition linear polarization is presented
   first. This makes it more basic than an elliptical or circular one.
   Do we have a good reason for starting another tradition? Is it worth
   the effort? There is always a price to pay for trying to establish a
   new order, even in teaching.