Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Einstein agrees that categories of the understanding are indeed
necessary and are indeed prior to observation, but Einstein, going
against Kant (and having the benefit of another 100 years of dramatic
change in science and math), states that the categories are not fixed by
the nature of human reason but are free creations, therefore choices and
subject to change. That these categories are freely chosen IN NO WAY
implies that all scientific knoweldge is purely conventional. Einstein
would not accept that at all. He states clearly (and the so called
logical positivists are his followers in this) that a scientific theory,
contrary to the naive popular view that is espoused in "scientific
method" classes, can not be somehow extracted from the data of sense
observation. There is no logically necessary path from observation to
the underlying theory. The theory gains its "truth value" from the
extent to which it explains and predicts observation, and of course that
it is not contradicted by observation, but the theory is not DERIVED
from observation. Theories are indeed free creations of the human mind,
but they are not random or arbitrary, and they are testable.
EInstein also makes very clear (in the answer to criticisms) that he is
in no way a solipsist, ...